Epic added a mute toggle for new Never Wanna emote

Cal Jeffrey

TS Evangelist
Staff member

Last Monday, Epic added a new Fortnite dance emote called "Never Gonna," which has been colloquially dubbed the "Rickroll" emote. The emote features the chorus from Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give You Up" playing in the background. Of course, to legally use the song in the game, Epic had to license it from RCA. No problem, right?

Ironically, Epic neglected to think of the people who helped make Fortnite a global phenomenon in the first place — the streamers and other video content creators. YouTube's copyright algorithms began flagging uploads containing the emote and demonetizing them, even if it was only a small fraction of the video.

Fortunately, Epic quickly realized the oversight and added a toggle to the audio settings of the game that allows players to mute the emote's music. For now, the feature is only available to PC users who have updated to Fortnite version 12.00. However, developers are working on bringing the functionality to all platforms.

"Starting in the 12.00 patch, creators playing on PC have the ability to mute licensed emote music and sounds," Epic tweeted from its Fortnite Status account.

So it sounds like the feature only targets licensed music or sound effects, which not only leaves the audio on other emotes alone, but also allows Epic to add more licensed audio down the road.

So why don't content creators simply stop using the emote? That would alleviate the problem from their end, but the song would still be heard if other players near them used the emote. A screenshot of the setting shows Epic thought of this by making a three-state toggle — Play, Mute Others, and Mute All.

This workaround should be enough to keep the record companies at bay and YouTube's algorithms in check. Such is the price content creators pay in the DMCA world.

Permalink to story.



TS Evangelist
Uh the real story here is its fair use and YT(and everyone else) needs to stop being so STUPID with their automated copyright claims.
  • Like
Reactions: Reehahs


TS Addict
If they didn't implement these system, content owners would of legally shut down / make YouTube or such service not commercially viable years ago.
Just one example - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc._v._YouTube,_Inc.
What he’s trying to say is that sometimes the YT copyright system can be abusive

As a “youtuber” myself, one of my videos once got copyright claimed because I used 10 seconds (around 9.88 seconds actually) of bad guy in the outro, which falls under fair use no matter what since no artist would limit the use of their song to under 10 seconds
fortunately they removed the claim a month after I appealed and my views went fine again

There’s no doubt that the yt content ID system has improved (kind of) but it can still be abusive (do you guys remember the old Pyrocynical outro?)
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Reehahs and lipe123