Final specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro Duo announced

First of all, AMD has had the fastest graphics card on the market for almost 2 years now. Where have you been? The HD7990 still destroys a Titan or 980Ti. With this, AMD will have the fastest 2 graphics cards on the market.

I doubt this will be short lived either. NVidia's Pascal is coming out, but not before Polaris from AMD. And if and when NVidia tries to launch their next Titan, AMD will already have Vega to trump. AMD has been planning this comeback for years and now they're executing and executing well at that. Sorry NVidia fans. It's about time!

First of all, relax, this is only a forum, you are not defending your honor, but maybe you are? And I don't know where you get your information but Polaris is due out by the end of summer, Pascal is out in June, also known as the beginning of summer, so you can't even read a calendar properly... Then you reference Vega which isn't even close to coming out, roadmaps place it mid 2017 which will go up against Nvidia's Volta, so what the hell? Why not throw Navi in to the mix just for shits and giggles to prove how much you don't know about time frames and roadmaps.

What just happened? Is this guy serious? But Priceless destruction from DBZ, saves me the trouble, so thank you for that, was also good for a couple laughs. Trolls are getting too serious about how but hurt they are over such meaningless things, it's almost like you insulted his woman. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets banned like stts1 did after hijacking the crap out of that 32 core build story, this guy literally joined the site to post on this one subject and is likely to disappear after everyone takes a turn chewing him out.
 
Last edited:
I'm sort of surprised you even responded DBZ!
I assumed he was a troll with all his Ramblings and nonsense spewing out across his multiple posts.
Hey, what can I say - I was bored.
I'm almost on board with your assumption - I'd just substitute "social justice warriorwannabee" for troll. Trolls seem to swap allegiance and stance whenever it looks like it might cause more friction. SJW's become more entrenched as criticism and their sense of persecution mounts. All we need to seal the deal is further commentary about how the worlds media is manipulated by a single smallish graphics-based company and how the facts regarding the graphics pipeline are in truth just another sign of a global conspiracy to keep AMD from worldwide preeminence .

It's kind of like talking down door-knocking Latter Day Saints disciples with logic. It can be entertaining and kills some time, but is basically a fruitless exercise since dogma trumps all else for the zealot. Hopefully the info and links in the post prove somewhat interesting to people whose enthusiasm runs to the whole industry rather than a single company ;)
 
Wow, the sheer amount of stupidity in this forum is ridiculous. The graph shows exactly what I said it shows, PERFORMANCE. If 4GB wasn't enough, you would see lower fps than the two NVidia cards, that generally outperform the Fury in DX11 titles. This one in particular uses all 6GB of DDR5 that are on the 980Ti, YET, the Fury X outperforms it. This shows how 6GB isn't necessary when you have HBM, you can get away with 4GB and still perform just as well, if not better than 6GB of GDDR5. The VRAM requirement for the game is 6GB if you're running 4K at Ultra settings, which is what I showed in the graph, genius. If you really want to understand, here's a video, showing the exact same game, on Ultra settings, but only at 1080P, and it still uses over 5GB of VRAM. I know very well how game programming and VRAM work. I'm surprised you don't, considering you speak as if you are a programmer.


You don't get it and I really don't care that you don't. Go on believing whatever you want all while facepalming as if you know something, it'll just make you look even dumber.


Nvidia GTX 970 running the same settings, same resolution, running over 60fps and the VRAM never goes over 4GB...so I am saying your video is fake or the ATI is not very efficient at handling it's VRAM...
 
HAHAHA, you guys are hilarious, throwing out words like "destruction" and "troll". On a final note, I am neither a troll, nor have had anything I've said be destroyed. I don't know how any of you interpreted the things I've said and mixed them around to try and make it seem like I said something completely different, but I know very well that Polaris will be out in JUNE, with Pascal coming out roughly at the same time, but I believe, based on what I've seen that Pascal will be released later and AMD will beat team Green to the punch. NV is only demoing one of it's cards this coming month. For a release to follow so soon after is a bit suspicious, but again, I'm not saying I know everything or can predict the future, just iterating/relaying the information that's out there. How anyone can "destroy" factual information is, well, g'head and think what you want.

As for AMD's planned comeback...uh, they've been planning a comeback ever since restructuring and hiring Jim Keller to design a whole new CPU architecture. This has been 4+ years in the making. I've been following them since the T-Bird days and prior to their aquisition of ATi (9700Pro ftw at the time).

As for AMD having had faster cards. I check some benchmarks and the 7990 still outperforms the titan, the 295x2 destroys the Titan, and this Pro Duo is untouchable. So...you can "defend your honor" and NVidia all you want, but the numbers speak for themselves. Proove otherwise.

In terms of the video being a fake...I dunno, maybe it is, I simply found it, saw that it was using a ton of VRAM, which coincides with the benchmarks and metrics of other user's systems that are running cards with 6+GB, showing that all 6 are used up at 4K with Ultra settings. The point I was trying to make remains valid. Fury X with only 4GB of HBM performs equally as good if not better than the NVidia 980Ti at 4K resolution, even when upwards of 6GB of VRAM is called up on an NVidia card, but AMD seem to have done a good job with the 4GB of HBM. This is not deniable. Again, try to "destroy" facts all you want, you'll just look retarded.

Sorry for defending myself when people come at me with condescending mannerisms first. I simply came on here to correct a lot of bad and ignorant statements about the Pro Duo.

You can tell me I don't know anything about VRAM allocation or how a GPU works or that I'm not one of the engineers behind is so there's no way for me to really know, and I will admit that I'm not one of the engineer who made it, so I don't know every detail about its design, but I do know and understand everything I've ready about these subjects and will only iterate/reiterate what I've read, so any type of insults toward me for doing so is really not directed at me, but the source of my information, which is fine if you want to spend your time doing it.

Am I an AMD fanboy? Yes, absolutely. Am I some crazy troll who comes out and creates a profile for a forum just to annoy people? No, but perhaps I have annoyed people anyway. Do I care? No.

So again, I'm only rude and condescending when I've been treated with rudeness and condescending mannerisms. So come at me all you want, but as you can see from how I responded to people who posted respectfully to me, I responded respectfully to them. Simple matter of treating people the way I've been treated, which is my twist on the golden rule, and one that I will never sway from, no matter how hard anyone tries to attack me for it, completely ignoring the why.

I'm not trying to promote AMD with "vendor specific" anything, but when AMD has something good on their hands, and everyone seems to hate on it, because it's AMD and they developed a bad reputation over the years, I'm going to come in and correct the ignorance if I can. The reason for all the posts, is because I responded to just about everyone's posts all at the same time, no "trolling" intended there or spamming of the thread. Could I have put all my responses in one post, sure, but did I care to spend the extra effort in doing so when I could simply click a "reply" button to get the job done? No. Do I care about forums and moderators who try to "clean up" a thread, asking people not to post multiple posts? No. They can clean it up if they want to. I have been a moderator of a forum for a company before, I understand the job, and generally give it respect, but when the forum displays such idiocy, I'm going to call it out.

What I expect, if you all are of a certain type of people, is to receive responses about how I'm the ***** and how I don't know what I'm talking about, and how AMD sucks, how I'm a troll, fanboy, marketing agent for AMD, that there are benchmarks there that show the opposite of what I posted (how about your video is fake. ever think about that? - even if it doesn't use all 4GB at 1080P, it WILL use them all and more at 4K Ultra, so...what have you to say about that? Nothing). If, perhaps more of you more intelligent, calm, collected minds responded first, I would have a much better outlook on this forum (I don't care that you don't care what my outlook is), but unfortunately, the intelligent people don't respond until much later, after the squabbling has already gone down. Perhaps, because they have jobs they tend to first during the day, who knows?

I am a man of science. I use numbers and metrics to defend information that I've come across, which is in a position to be defended, if I care about the subject enough to defend it.

The fact is: My opinion of the Pro Duo is that it is an incredible card. Overpriced? Yeah, but still the best performing card on the planet, which is why it costs as much as a Titan, which, whoever said they only sell for $999 is dead wrong.

http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Fastest-Graphics-12G-P4-3990-KR/dp/B00JZ4SN4C

So, $3000 it is, but you get free shipping, so it's cool. Nope. It costs twice as much as a Pro Duo and...

http://www.techpowerup.com/220891/a...to-51-percent-faster-than-geforce-gtx-titan-z

Would anyone care to debate this subject with intelligence, rationale, and reason? This I would welcome and am always open to learning new things from anyone with enough information that I don't have, and the ability to explain what they know.
 
Last edited:
HAHAHA, you guys are hilarious, throwing out words like "destruction" and "troll". On a final note, I am neither a troll, nor have had anything I've said be destroyed. I don't know how any of you interpreted the things I've said and mixed them around to try and make it seem like I said something completely different, but I know very well that Polaris will be out in JUNE, with Pascal coming out roughly at the same time, but I believe, based on what I've seen that Pascal will be released later and AMD will beat team Green to the punch. NV is only demoing one of it's cards this coming month. For a release to follow so soon after is a bit suspicious, but again, I'm not saying I know everything or can predict the future, just iterating/relaying the information that's out there. How anyone can "destroy" factual information is, well, g'head and think what you want.

You can believe whatever you want to believe, STOP portraying it as fact already. How do you KNOW Polaris will be out in June? Where are you facts to back that up? And you "Believe" Pascal will be released later, good for you, but your beliefs do not matter in a factual argument. And then there's this...

AMD’s Polaris will be a mainstream GPU, not high-end

As for AMD's planned comeback...uh, they've been planning a comeback ever since restructuring and hiring Jim Keller to design a whole new CPU architecture. This has been 4+ years in the making. I've been following them since the T-Bird days and prior to their aquisition of ATi (9700Pro ftw at the time).

You know, anyone can say that, would it be logical that AMD just plans to sit back and dwindle away and let Nvidia dominate the market? No, and the same thing has been said for years by self proclaimed AMD fan boys, AMD is coming back! Okay, but I truly do not care what they claim until I see it, but based on what I've seen this isn't really ever going to happen.

As for AMD having had faster cards. I check some benchmarks and the 7990 still outperforms the titan, the 295x2 destroys the Titan, and this Pro Duo is untouchable. So...you can "defend your honor" and NVidia all you want, but the numbers speak for themselves. Proove otherwise.

Please, what benchmarks do you have that show the Pro Duo destroying the Titan? Are there any even released? Are you merely basing this on your "beliefs" again? And it's not hard to find specific AMD optimized games that out perform Nvidia hardware, it's all AMD has to keep themselves afloat with misguided fan boys. "Oh but my AMD hardware performs faster in "X" application, but gets destroyed in application "Y" and "Z"...

Sorry for defending myself when people come at me with condescending mannerisms first. I simply came on here to correct a lot of bad and ignorant statements about the Pro Duo.

And did so by proving nothing relevant to your cause, just making it brutally clear how little you actually know and how you "believe" AMD is the better GPU manufacturer/vendor, Cool Story Bro...

You can tell me I don't know anything about VRAM allocation or how a GPU works or that I'm not one of the engineers behind is so there's no way for me to really know, and I will admit that I'm not one of the engineer who made it, so I don't know every detail about its design, but I do know and understand everything I've ready about these subjects and will only iterate/reiterate what I've read, so any type of insults toward me for doing so is really not directed at me, but the source of my information, which is fine if you want to spend your time doing it.

It's one thing to read all these articles, it's completely different to misinterpret the information and twist it in your favor, but again, it's what you "believe" so it's impossible to argue with that, your too set in your ways at this point and will not be swayed no matter what anyone says against you, it becomes easier for you to say we don't know what were talking about and put your foil hat back on.

Am I an AMD fanboy? Yes, absolutely. Am I some crazy troll who comes out and creates a profile for a forum just to annoy people? No, but perhaps I have annoyed people anyway. Do I care? No.

Something we already knew, no need to tell us this, and why would anything you say after that have any meaning.

So again, I'm only rude and condescending when I've been treated with rudeness and condescending mannerisms. So come at me all you want, but as you can see from how I responded to people who posted respectfully to me, I responded respectfully to them. Simple matter of treating people the way I've been treated, which is my twist on the golden rule, and one that I will never sway from, no matter how hard anyone tries to attack me for it, completely ignoring the why.

Your first string of posts was rude and condescending, you beat us all to that, people here just reply in the same manner and big surprise you got offended...

I'm not trying to promote AMD with "vendor specific" anything, but when AMD has something good on their hands, and everyone seems to hate on it, because it's AMD and they developed a bad reputation over the years, I'm going to come in and correct the ignorance if I can. The reason for all the posts, is because I responded to just about everyone's posts all at the same time, no "trolling" intended there or spamming of the thread. Could I have put all my responses in one post, sure, but did I care to spend the extra effort in doing so when I could simply click a "reply" button to get the job done? No. Do I care about forums and moderators who try to "clean up" a thread, asking people not to post multiple posts? No. They can clean it up if they want to. I have been a moderator of a forum for a company before, I understand the job, and generally give it respect, but when the forum displays such idiocy, I'm going to call it out.

Who are you to correct our ignorance? You can't even figure out how to group you post together into a concise argument instead post 10 times in a row jumping all over the place, and if you don't care please just go away, you've immediately lost all respect if you can't respect the forum your posting on. But yet you feel you have the right to call out people, your ridiculous...

What I expect, if you all are of a certain type of people, is to receive responses about how I'm the ***** and how I don't know what I'm talking about, and how AMD sucks, how I'm a troll, fanboy, marketing agent for AMD, that there are benchmarks there that show the opposite of what I posted (how about your video is fake. ever think about that? - even if it doesn't use all 4GB at 1080P, it WILL use them all and more at 4K Ultra, so...what have you to say about that? Nothing). If, perhaps more of you more intelligent, calm, collected minds responded first, I would have a much better outlook on this forum (I don't care that you don't care what my outlook is), but unfortunately, the intelligent people don't respond until much later, after the squabbling has already gone down. Perhaps, because they have jobs they tend to first during the day, who knows?

It's called time zones genius, not everyone lives in the same one as you, there's people from all over the world posting on this site, maybe you would know that if you weren't so damn full of yourself. Also this thing called breaks and downtime, but your too intelligent for those I suppose.

I am a man of science. I use numbers and metrics to defend information that I've come across, which is in a position to be defended, if I care about the subject enough to defend it.

It's about time you try to defend yourself with some numbers, but it's too little too late, and irrelevant at best.

The fact is: My opinion of the Pro Duo is that it is an incredible card. Overpriced? Yeah, but still the best performing card on the planet, which is why it costs as much as a Titan, which, whoever said they only sell for $999 is dead wrong.

http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Fastest-Graphics-12G-P4-3990-KR/dp/B00JZ4SN4C

So, $3000 it is, but you get free shipping, so it's cool. Nope. It costs twice as much as a Pro Duo and...

http://www.techpowerup.com/220891/a...to-51-percent-faster-than-geforce-gtx-titan-z

Would anyone care to debate this subject with intelligence, rationale, and reason? This I would welcome and am always open to learning new things from anyone with enough information that I don't have, and the ability to explain what they know.

So your best argument is that an unreleased GPU can outperform one that's a year old, well sure I can give that to you, but if you want to compare unreleased GPU to unreleased GPU you should compare it to the X80 Titan, which will be twice as fast as the current Titan. So good for the Pro Duo being up to 51% faster than the current Titan that's been out for over a year, as soon as Nvidia releases the final spec and we get some actual benchmarks your just blowing smoke out your ***. Which has been apparent from the beginning.

And finally, the Titan X is the current Maxwell based Titan which does have a MSRP of $999, the Titan Z is a Kepler based dual GPU solution, Nvidia never bothered releasing a dual GPU version with Maxwell, other than in Quadro form, because the competition never had anything pushing them to do so, had they, and this is only because you live in hypothetical world, it would mop the floor with the Pro Duo, but because neither have any real benchmarks nothing can really be said. Which is funny because that hasn't kept you from running your mouth this whole time.
 
HAHAHA, you guys are hilarious, throwing out words like "destruction" and "troll". On a final note, I am neither a troll, nor have had anything I've said be destroyed. I don't know how any of you interpreted the things I've said and mixed them around to try and make it seem like I said something completely different, but I know very well that Polaris will be out in JUNE, with Pascal coming out roughly at the same time, but I believe, based on what I've seen that Pascal will be released later and AMD will beat team Green to the punch. NV is only demoing one of it's cards this coming month. For a release to follow so soon after is a bit suspicious, but again, I'm not saying I know everything or can predict the future, just iterating/relaying the information that's out there. How anyone can "destroy" factual information is, well, g'head and think what you want.

As for AMD's planned comeback...uh, they've been planning a comeback ever since restructuring and hiring Jim Keller to design a whole new CPU architecture. This has been 4+ years in the making. I've been following them since the T-Bird days and prior to their aquisition of ATi (9700Pro ftw at the time).

As for AMD having had faster cards. I check some benchmarks and the 7990 still outperforms the titan, the 295x2 destroys the Titan, and this Pro Duo is untouchable. So...you can "defend your honor" and NVidia all you want, but the numbers speak for themselves. Proove otherwise.

In terms of the video being a fake...I dunno, maybe it is, I simply found it, saw that it was using a ton of VRAM, which coincides with the benchmarks and metrics of other user's systems that are running cards with 6+GB, showing that all 6 are used up at 4K with Ultra settings. The point I was trying to make remains valid. Fury X with only 4GB of HBM performs equally as good if not better than the NVidia 980Ti at 4K resolution, even when upwards of 6GB of VRAM is called up on an NVidia card, but AMD seem to have done a good job with the 4GB of HBM. This is not deniable. Again, try to "destroy" facts all you want, you'll just look retarded.

Sorry for defending myself when people come at me with condescending mannerisms first. I simply came on here to correct a lot of bad and ignorant statements about the Pro Duo.

You can tell me I don't know anything about VRAM allocation or how a GPU works or that I'm not one of the engineers behind is so there's no way for me to really know, and I will admit that I'm not one of the engineer who made it, so I don't know every detail about its design, but I do know and understand everything I've ready about these subjects and will only iterate/reiterate what I've read, so any type of insults toward me for doing so is really not directed at me, but the source of my information, which is fine if you want to spend your time doing it.

Am I an AMD fanboy? Yes, absolutely. Am I some crazy troll who comes out and creates a profile for a forum just to annoy people? No, but perhaps I have annoyed people anyway. Do I care? No.

So again, I'm only rude and condescending when I've been treated with rudeness and condescending mannerisms. So come at me all you want, but as you can see from how I responded to people who posted respectfully to me, I responded respectfully to them. Simple matter of treating people the way I've been treated, which is my twist on the golden rule, and one that I will never sway from, no matter how hard anyone tries to attack me for it, completely ignoring the why.

I'm not trying to promote AMD with "vendor specific" anything, but when AMD has something good on their hands, and everyone seems to hate on it, because it's AMD and they developed a bad reputation over the years, I'm going to come in and correct the ignorance if I can. The reason for all the posts, is because I responded to just about everyone's posts all at the same time, no "trolling" intended there or spamming of the thread. Could I have put all my responses in one post, sure, but did I care to spend the extra effort in doing so when I could simply click a "reply" button to get the job done? No. Do I care about forums and moderators who try to "clean up" a thread, asking people not to post multiple posts? No. They can clean it up if they want to. I have been a moderator of a forum for a company before, I understand the job, and generally give it respect, but when the forum displays such idiocy, I'm going to call it out.

What I expect, if you all are of a certain type of people, is to receive responses about how I'm the ***** and how I don't know what I'm talking about, and how AMD sucks, how I'm a troll, fanboy, marketing agent for AMD, that there are benchmarks there that show the opposite of what I posted (how about your video is fake. ever think about that? - even if it doesn't use all 4GB at 1080P, it WILL use them all and more at 4K Ultra, so...what have you to say about that? Nothing). If, perhaps more of you more intelligent, calm, collected minds responded first, I would have a much better outlook on this forum (I don't care that you don't care what my outlook is), but unfortunately, the intelligent people don't respond until much later, after the squabbling has already gone down. Perhaps, because they have jobs they tend to first during the day, who knows?

I am a man of science. I use numbers and metrics to defend information that I've come across, which is in a position to be defended, if I care about the subject enough to defend it.

The fact is: My opinion of the Pro Duo is that it is an incredible card. Overpriced? Yeah, but still the best performing card on the planet, which is why it costs as much as a Titan, which, whoever said they only sell for $999 is dead wrong.

http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Fastest-Graphics-12G-P4-3990-KR/dp/B00JZ4SN4C

So, $3000 it is, but you get free shipping, so it's cool. Nope. It costs twice as much as a Pro Duo and...

http://www.techpowerup.com/220891/a...to-51-percent-faster-than-geforce-gtx-titan-z

Would anyone care to debate this subject with intelligence, rationale, and reason? This I would welcome and am always open to learning new things from anyone with enough information that I don't have, and the ability to explain what they know.


You continue to make me laugh, the Nvidia card you linked above is to the Titan Z, which IS NOT the latest Titan Card, the latest card is the Titan X, .... so do your numbers again... nice try... keep it up... I like seeing how much you don't know...
 
The fact is: My opinion of the Pro Duo is that it is an incredible card. Overpriced? Yeah, but still the best performing card on the planet, which is why it costs as much as a Titan, which, whoever said they only sell for $999 is dead wrong. http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Fastest-Graphics-12G-P4-3990-KR/dp/B00JZ4SN4C
Nope. Every Titan (GTX Titan, Titan Black, Titan X) has MSRP'd at $999 in reference form with the exception of the EoL'd Titan Z
You aren't very good at this are you.
Could I have put all my responses in one post, sure, but did I care to spend the extra effort in doing so when I could simply click a "reply" button to get the job done? No. Do I care about forums and moderators who try to "clean up" a thread, asking people not to post multiple posts? No.
shaking_head_breaking_bad.gif

I have been a moderator of a forum for a company before
But I'm guessing Dora was a lot more tolerant of your behaviour than actual real people...
laptop1.jpg
...some people, myself included, have a very low threshold for shills, guerrilla marketing, hypocrisy, and outright FUD - so don't be surprised when your own behaviour is thrown back at you. Regardless of the content of other posters, it is just common courtesy to respect the rules of the forum. Why target the moderators for extra work because you feel the need to throw a tantrum after having your lack of knowledge exposed and taking exception at being corrected? Those are the actions of a child.
The point I was trying to make remains valid. Fury X with only 4GB of HBM performs equally as good if not better than the NVidia 980Ti at 4K resolution, even when upwards of 6GB of VRAM is called up on an NVidia card, but AMD seem to have done a good job with the 4GB of HBM. This is not deniable. Again, try to "destroy" facts all you want, you'll just look retarded.
The capacity is immaterial. Both cards use the around the same amount of memory, but cards with a smaller vRAM capacity rely more on dynamic (system) memory as I have already said. Any reasonable analysis ( try this one from Scott Wasson who now works for AMD) will show scaling is consistent across 4GB/6GB/12GB because while the smaller framebuffer could become saturated, it can still call on system memory to handle the excess data.
There's essentially no difference between the performance of the GTX 980 Ti 6GB and the Titan X 12GB, even at the very highest resolution we can test. Looks like 6GB is sufficient for this work. Heck, look closer, and the GTX 980's performance scales very similarly even though it only has 4GB of VRAM.- Scott Wasson
The only one here that is looking retarded is you. Ignoring facts for your own deluded fantasies that aren't borne out by any proof. Hell, you could actually see the dedicated vs dynamic memory allocation in action just by running HWiNFO64 monitoring a D3D application
As for AMD having had faster cards. I check some benchmarks and the 7990 still outperforms the titan
...except your assertion was that the HD7990 was faster than the GTX 980 Ti...
First of all, AMD has had the fastest graphics card on the market for almost 2 years now. Where have you been? The HD7990 still destroys a Titan or 980Ti.
So, moving the goalposts again, or did you suddenly realize that a HD 7990 barely beats a GTX 980 let alone comes anywhere close to the GTX 980 Ti?
perfrel_3840.gif


You truly are a poster boy everything that is symptomatic in the decline of enthusiast tech forums at the expense of clickbait trollfests like the Disqus lowest common denominator sites of wccftech, fudzilla, and videocardz
Am I an AMD fanboy? Yes, absolutely.
'nuff said
 
The only thing I have to say is lets put two TitanX's together and then you can have a fair comparison to what this new ATI card really is, but with a LOT less RAM which is just stupid no matter how fast it is. That is all I have left to say about this, ATI has a star in the sky until tomorrow when the new Nvidia line is introduced in which ATI will once again take a back seat as always... nothing new.
 
The only thing I have to say is lets put two TitanX's together and then you can have a fair comparison to what this new ATI card really is, but with a LOT less RAM which is just stupid no matter how fast it is. That is all I have left to say about this, ATI has a star in the sky until tomorrow when the new Nvidia line is introduced in which ATI will once again take a back seat as always... nothing new.
PC Per have a review up comparing the Pro Duo with Nano crossfire and GTX 980 Ti SLI. AMD's internal benchmarking again seems generous....unlikely most sites would omit more than a couple of these games in their bench suite....and check out the GTA V 4K frame variance - closer to San Andreas I think ( the seismograph from the movie rather than the game)

4K
H8QejYH.png


2560x1440
oyGFuPp.png
 
Last edited:
Back