Fusion rocket could cut Mars trips in half and reach Pluto in four years

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 754   +16
Staff
Forward-looking: British startup Pulsar Fusion has unveiled its ambitious nuclear fusion rocket concept, Sunbird, designed to dramatically shorten interplanetary travel times. Developed in secret over the past decade, the project aims to cut the journey to Mars in half and reach Pluto in just four years. With ground testing scheduled for 2025 and an orbital demonstration planned for 2027, Sunbird could mark a bold leap forward in next-generation propulsion technology.

Unlike conventional chemical rockets, Sunbird relies on nuclear fusion – a process that replicates the energy production at the core of stars – to propel spacecraft. Rather than operating independently, these fusion-powered vehicles are designed to attach to larger spacecraft, towing payloads efficiently across vast interplanetary distances.

Fusion propulsion builds on Pulsar Fusion's prior collaborations with major academic institutions. In 2023, the company partnered with the Universities of Southampton and Cambridge on UK Space Agency-funded projects exploring integrated nuclear fission systems for electric propulsion.

"We have recently commissioned not one, but two of the largest space propulsion testing chambers in the U.K., if not all of Europe," said CEO Richard Dinan. "Pulsar is now an international space propulsion testing powerhouse, and we have ambitious plans to expand rapidly."

The company's immediate focus is progressing toward in-orbit testing. Components of Sunbird are scheduled for demonstration later this year as Pulsar Fusion pushes forward with its goal of achieving nuclear fusion in space by 2027. The broader vision includes deploying a fleet of heavily shielded spacecraft stationed in orbit to support missions for international partners, potentially enabling routine travel between Earth, Mars, and beyond.

Nuclear fusion offers transformative potential over traditional energy sources such as nuclear fission or fossil fuels. While fission splits heavy radioactive elements like uranium into lighter ones, fusion combines light elements – typically hydrogen – under extreme temperatures and pressures. The result is a process that generates four times more energy than fission and millions of times more than fossil fuels, all while producing no dangerous radioactive waste.

Despite its promise, sustaining fusion reactions on Earth remains difficult due to the immense energy input required.

Dinan argues that space presents a more favorable environment for fusion, thanks to its natural lack of atmospheric interference. "It's very unnatural to do fusion on Earth," Dinan told CNN. "Space is a far more logical, sensible place to do fusion because that's where it wants to happen anyway."

The Sunbird's design capitalizes on this advantage by using linear reactors rather than the circular tokamaks commonly employed on Earth. These reactors utilize strong magnetic fields to heat plasma, creating the conditions necessary for fusion using trace amounts of fuel, such as helium-3.

Unlike Earth-based reactors that rely on neutron interactions for heat, Sunbird would produce protons as "nuclear exhaust," directly propelling the spacecraft. While this method is inefficient and costly for terrestrial energy generation, it is well-suited for space travel, where reducing fuel mass and achieving high speeds are crucial.

Dinan likened Sunbird's functionality to urban bike-sharing systems: reusable vehicles stationed in orbit that rendezvous with spacecraft mid-journey to replace inefficient chemical engines with fusion-powered alternatives. This concept could dramatically shorten interplanetary missions, enabling trips between Earth and Mars in under six months and journeys to Jupiter or Saturn in just two to four years.

Initial demonstrations will begin with testing circuit boards in orbit later this year, followed by a small-scale linear fusion experiment in 2027 to validate the underlying physics. If successful, full-scale Sunbird vehicles could be operational within five years.

Sunbird's potential extends beyond interplanetary travel. It could also support asteroid mining missions, cutting round-trip times from three years to as little as one or two.

Other organizations are pursuing similar paths. Helicity Space, for example, has secured an investment from Lockheed Martin to develop its own fusion engine, while NASA and General Atomics are advancing fission-based reactors for potential crewed Mars missions, with tests scheduled for 2027.

Experts outside Pulsar Fusion recognize the transformative potential of fusion propulsion, despite its technical challenges. Aaron Knoll of Imperial College London told CNN that while energy output must exceed input for Earth-based power generation, space propulsion benefits from any net energy since it directly boosts thrust efficiency. However, miniaturizing the reactor and support systems remains a key engineering challenge.

Bhuvana Srinivasan from the University of Washington emphasized the dramatic advantages fusion propulsion could offer, even for lunar missions. With its high thrust and efficiency, it could enable single-trip deployments of entire lunar bases, complete with crew. She also highlighted the possibility of using fusion-powered missions for resource extraction, such as harvesting helium-3 from the Moon – a critical fuel for future fusion reactors.

Unlocking fusion propulsion, she added, would not only extend humanity's reach into deep space but could also bring wide-ranging benefits. "Exploration of planets, moons, and solar systems farther away is fundamental to our curious and exploratory nature as humans while also potentially leading to substantial financial and societal benefit in ways that we may not yet realize."

Permalink to story:

 
Kind of reminds me of the "future battery tech" articles... while this MIGHT become something one day, the odds are fairly minuscule... Let me know in 2030 if I was wrong...
Well, it is "New Battery Monday" on TS.

There should be a requirement to follow up on all the promised battery innovations every 12 months in order to post the original article. But that would cut into the number of stories by probably 5% or so.
 
Kind of reminds me of the "future battery tech" articles... while this MIGHT become something one day, the odds are fairly minuscule... Let me know in 2030 if I was wrong...
I'd disagree (though I do agree with new battery tech articles being nonsense and fusion for power gen always being "20 years away") - in this case it is focusing on using fusion for propulsion not energy generation, you just want the thing to go, even if its a bit innefficient, and especially in space where you are just pushing out a stream of protons and don't have to deal with "pesky" problems like gravity or the atmosphere, so for a towing vehicle, so to speak, it could work out well, so long as it can actually efficiently tow any payload, be made at a scale where it can be small enough etc., so not impossible, if they were talking about using it to power a rocket from earth, or using it for power generation, then yes, its investor hunting nonsense, but this *might* (NOTE: might) have some plausability
 
A shame that orbital fusion reactors that use microwaves to beam power back to Earth is technically infeasible.
 
Unless I'm missing something, while being in space might help, the amount of energy to jump start fusion is rather large. What starts and keeps the reactions going?
If the reaction were ever started, the reaction would keep going as long as fuel is supplied to it - in theory at least. Cut off the fuel, the reaction stops.
 
If the reaction were ever started, the reaction would keep going as long as fuel is supplied to it - in theory at least. Cut off the fuel, the reaction stops.

Except, as a practical matter, confining the fuel and energy in close enough proximity for a sustained reaction has proven elusive.
 
Aren't there plenty of other companies working on these things? I remember articles like these 2, 5, 10 years ago. When are they going to put these to test?
 
Sounds promising and with fairly recent future dates in the planning.
It being from the UK also inspires a bit more confidence than it being news from the US or China.
The US has too many silicon valley investor scams. Use confusing tech lingo and half truths promising to be the leader in some next gen thing and the money follows.
China has too many overstatements where they say they're way ahead of the rest of the world whilst stumbling along at the same pace as the rest of us.

The UK could definitely do with a win, it's been a fustercluck for a while now with Brexit being the crowning achievement of stupidity.

But will it be FAST enough for the Vulcans to detect its signature and come land on Earth and give us all the secrets of the universe? LOL

Nah, still regular propulsion tech. The Vulcans (Federation) only show up once a warp drive is invented. So until we figure out how to warp time space there'll be no-one showing up to greet us.

We are however on track for Star Treks 2026 prediction of WW3.
Massive Chinese mobile bridge ships have been spotted near Taiwan. That could end up in a US vs China.
We already got the middle East and Ukraine/Russia situations.
The Korea halves could go at it if the US is pre occupied. India and Pakistan could go for their own round 4.
If Europe doesn't come to the USs aid perhaps the US will make good on its ambitions to take Canada and Greenland?
Africa has plenty of internal conflicts.

Let's hope it remains fiction
 
No matter how plausible this is it sounds like a concept that you could sell to the current occupants of the White house.
Sometimes things after 10 years of working in secret just mature enough.
 
The Korea halves could go at it if the US is pre occupied.
N Koreans right now are getting a very real modern warfare training. It is priceless. Can S Koreans, that do not get the same training, even hold them if chubby king decides it is time to unite Koreas? Technology of warfare changed within few years. USA should have every involvement in Ukrainian war, not because it should help free people fighting for their freedom, for its own safety and the lives of its soldiers.
 
After they are successful, I wonder how much US rocketry companies will have to pay for them.
After adding in tariffs.
 
Hope to see another article for ground testing results. If atmosphere is the issue, there are plenty of vacuum or near vacuum test chambers that are fairly massive in scale. I don't like the fusion naturally happens in space argument though... a star is simply a gas giant that reaches sufficient compression to start fusion, lots of atmospheres of pressure.
 
Being longer in space as a human as 6 to 12 months already brings complications, 4 years is quite impossible for humans without even having serious health effects from traveling so long through space.

We humans are build for conditions on earth; a really unique one in the universe. It would be better to have robots deal with whatever is on the universe rather then sending in humans.

 
The Sun's gravity alone is enough to crush Hydrogen into Helium creating Fusian solely by mass and gravity.

Human made Fusion is far more involving and requires more energy, input and planning as well as control.

I know it's possible to create fusion, but it isn't self-sustaining and does not (can not )create "free energy".

No matter how fast you get to MARS you have to spend an equal amount of energy slowing down. That's the part I'm waiting to see them figure out.
 
Back