GM just updated 250,000 EVs to sell power back to the grid

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,004   +58
Staff
First look: A software update doesn't usually change what a car is, but General Motors is betting this one might. The automaker has begun enabling certain electric vehicles to send power back to the grid, building on a setup that, until now, was mostly talked about as a backup for homes during outages. With the update, the same cars can work as small energy sources, feeding electricity into local grids when demand jumps.

GM has already put the basics in place. Roughly 250,000 of its electric vehicles on US roads can perform bidirectional charging – power can flow into the battery and back out again. That has mostly meant keeping the lights on at home during an outage. Now GM is trying to plug that same capability into the wider grid.

The company can "turn every GM EV on the road into a distributed power resource," said Sterling Anderson, the automaker's chief product officer, at a company event in San Francisco on Tuesday.

The basic idea is simple, even if the logistics are not. Drivers charge when electricity is cheap, then sell some of that energy back when the grid is under strain. Utilities get a flexible source of extra power without building new plants, and GM takes a cut of what owners earn.

Even so, adoption remains limited. While hundreds of thousands of vehicles have the bidirectional hardware, only "thousands" of customers are actually using GM Energy systems, according to the company.

To let a car power a home – or tie into the grid – owners need extra hardware sold through GM Energy, a roughly four-year-old subsidiary. The package runs about $20,000 before installation, and GM says most customers can earn that back in around five years, depending on how often they use the system and local power prices.

There's also the coordination problem. The US grid is run by nearly 3,000 utilities, each with its own rules. Each one has to sign off on the equipment and create a program that pays customers for the power they send back. GM says it is talking with roughly 10 utilities now, with early rollouts expected in states such as California and Texas.

In Michigan, GM is working with DTE Energy on a small-scale test involving 30 employees. The goal is to understand how EVs behave as grid assets under real-world conditions. On the West Coast, the company is collaborating with Pacific Gas and Electric on a longer-term effort to connect 52,000 vehicles to Northern California's grid by 2030.

The slow pace is not unusual for a technology that sits at the intersection of automotive engineering and utility infrastructure. A research project led by UC Irvine, in partnership with Kia and Hyundai, took years to deploy across just six homes. "Here we are two years later – not four weeks later – and utilities around the country are just beginning to address this," Scott Samuelsen, who directed the project and is a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at UC Irvine, told Wired. "It's very new."

Utilities are still working through basic questions, including how to ensure different systems can communicate and how to manage the added complexity of mobile energy sources. In Washington state, Puget Sound Energy is running a pilot program through early next year to test those dynamics. Clint Stewart, a senior product development manager at PSE, expects progress, but not quickly. "I'd like to believe that in five years, we'll be at a point where it's relatively figured out," he says.

For GM, the technical hurdles are only part of the challenge. The company also needs to convince drivers that sharing their battery capacity is worth it. That means giving owners confidence they won't be left without enough charge when they need to drive. Over time, GM expects the software to learn a driver's routine and avoid draining the battery right before they need the car.

More broadly, GM's move fits a trend across the industry. With EV demand buffeted by policy shifts, automakers from Ford to Tesla have been trying to build energy businesses alongside their car sales.

"We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reshape how drivers interact with their vehicles and turn them into something more than just transportation," said Wade Sheffer, GM Energy's vice president.

Permalink to story:

 
It's quite obvious that the near-future involves privatization of the energy grid. Amazon and Google for example are firing up nuclear power plants. I won't be surprised when people are getting energy from either company. They want us on subscriptions.

I have a GM EV and aside from using the truck as generator in case my local power failed, I have no plans on "selling energy back to the grid". No: that's what I'd have solar panels and a backup battery for. Solar panels would fully charge my backup battery and then my house would use the energy from the battery rather than the grid. When I'm out of country for vacation months, that energy could go back to the grid to support the grid.

There are issues however: you can't use your own equipment for that. My Lectron V Box doesn't support reverse charging. GM's equipment solution does. And then there's the question: what if I leave GM and go to Mercedes? Will all this stuff still communicate and play nice? Is there are communication standard for EV to communicate with their charging equipment that they want to reverse charge?

 
" We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reshape how drivers interact with their vehicles and turn them into something more than just transportation"

First of all, no. Other brands have been able to do this for years. Notably, your biggest competitor Ford.

Second, consumer swant their cars to be cars. Nothing more. Get that through your skulls.

Third, this is an atrocious idea. Just at the offset, $20k is SO much electricity, it will take over decades to break even, not counting the massive dc-dc charging efficiency loss or the wear on the battery itself.

Using your EV as a home backup is one thing. Selling power to the grid is a whole other game.
 
It would probably wear down the battery faster. Unless they can prove beyond any doubt that
this does not wear battery faster, this is a waste of money.
Let's say this somehow does not affect the battery at all.
What about that 20000 dollar price?
It is insanely expensive.
Last of all, this seems like something that should be done in alliance of all EV makers.
Same equipment, same standards.
 
It would probably wear down the battery faster. Unless they can prove beyond any doubt that
this does not wear battery faster, this is a waste of money.
Let's say this somehow does not affect the battery at all.
What about that 20000 dollar price?
It is insanely expensive.
Last of all, this seems like something that should be done in alliance of all EV makers.
Same equipment, same standards.

If it were possible to cycle a battery without causing wear on the cells, this would be a technolgical breakthrough on par with galvanization or the LED.
 
Uhhh I feel to see any upside to the person owning the car.
GM gets $20k - good for them.
The powergrid can be neglected for longer because wooo distributed contributors.

As the owner of the car you get...
a $20k bill and your battery wearing down faster which will devalue your car pretty dang hard. Oh and if you suddenly want to (or have to) go on an unexpected trip you might find that your battery isn't quite as charged as you expected it to be.

Spend that $20k on a home battery backup system instead if you want to tough out the grid going down. Still not a great investment but at least it doesn't devalue your car.
 
Fascinating. GM wants drivers to pay $20k of their own money to incur additional wear on the battery of their vehicles, which have a finite number of charge cycles. Should be interesting to see the next update on this.

The icing on the cake is the cut they take from selling power back to the grid.
 
Back