It's being ignored that YouTube added advertising about four years ago now? It makes YouTube exactly like a radio, without a dj. Label artists get tunnel vision, and think the argument is the same as it was four years ago? If you want "total control" over product don't publish it to begin with. Do they want a law against humming without copyright clearance? Artists should be seeking reparations against advertising sponsors, not expressing disgust with their very own fans as Alannah Myles, Don Henley, Shelby Lynne, Roseanne Cash, Vince Gill, & Ian Paice, have very recently done. Ian Paice seemed to expressed a change of heart, but the others express contempt for fans they say have not purchased their songs, "legitimately." Many of these above achieved record label attention from nepotism to begin with, you'd think they realize that, before parading publicly about certain legal claims that may not even be Constitutionally sound to begin with, again especially with last four years, not eight years ago. With these label artist's express contempt about fans it's like sending an addressed letter to that fans residence. Fans are not educated like label artists are. I find it an error in label artist's judgement and sickening.
