Google is reviving a nuclear power plant that has sat idle for the last five years

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,595   +1,682
Staff member
Fixing their own problem: As Big Tech pursues its AI ambitions, its energy demands are growing exponentially. The industry is on track to surpass residential electricity consumption, if it hasn't already. Some of the largest corporate consumers are turning to nuclear power investments to meet their needs.

Google has partnered with NextEra Energy to revive Iowa's only nuclear power plant – the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Palo, near Cedar Rapids. The effort aims to provide reliable, carbon-free energy in the region to meet surging electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence. The companies plan to reopen the plant by the first quarter of 2029, pending regulatory approval.

Under a 25-year agreement, Google will purchase power from the 615-megawatt plant to fuel its cloud and AI infrastructure in Iowa. NextEra Energy is acquiring the remaining minority stakes held by Central Iowa Power Cooperative and Corn Belt Power Cooperative, bringing its ownership to 100 percent.

The restart will generate substantial economic impact. Construction will create more than 1,600 direct and indirect jobs across Iowa, while operations will sustain roughly 400 full-time positions in Linn County. Local operations will produce over $127 million in annual earnings, alongside $320 million in economic output and $3 million in tax revenue to support schools and infrastructure.

The project highlights a growing trend in the tech industry. As AI expands, companies need stable, low-carbon power to run data centers. Google notes that reopening an existing nuclear facility is one of the fastest ways to deploy large-scale, always-on clean energy. Other tech firms are pursuing similar nuclear initiatives to meet rising demand, especially as newer, safer, and more cost-effective small modular reactors gain popularity.

State leaders emphasized Iowa's role in the nation's energy transition. Governor Kim Reynolds called the project "an exciting announcement" that positions the state as a hub for clean, reliable energy supporting emerging technologies. Local officials highlighted that the plant's return provides multigenerational employment opportunities for families in Linn County.

NextEra Energy framed the project as both a technological and economic milestone. Chief Executive John Ketchum called the restart "an important milestone."

"Our partnership with Google not only brings nuclear energy back to Iowa – it also accelerates the development of next-generation nuclear technology," Ketchum said.

Google CFO Ruth Porat said the partnership exemplifies the investments needed nationwide to expand energy capacity, maintain affordability, and support an AI-driven economy.

The Duane Arnold restart follows extensive engineering evaluations and coordination with federal and state regulators, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NextEra Energy and Google are exploring additional nuclear projects across the United States, signaling a broader strategy to expand carbon-free energy solutions for both industry and regional grids.

The NextEra deal expands Google's existing nuclear power efforts. Earlier this year, the company committed to funding three new nuclear projects in partnership with Elementl Power. While financial details remain under wraps, Elementl expects each facility to generate more than 600 MW of power.

Permalink to story:

 
At least this power plant makes sense vs all the other nuclear options out there since it is already physically constructed. Building new nuclear plants is going to take years before any energy is generated.
 
Private industry doing what governments just refuse to do: use clean energy.

I will never understand the doublethink required to demand the populace buy EVs while simultaneously shutting down the nuclear grid in favor of fossil fuels. Its a catastrophic waste.
 
Building new nuclear plants is going to take years before any energy is generated.
And? Don't people want more (and clean) energy for the future?

I will never understand the doublethink required to demand the populace buy EVs while simultaneously shutting down the nuclear grid in favor of fossil fuels. Its a catastrophic waste.
I thought it was shutting down Nuclear in favour of other (far) less convenient green options..?
 
And? Don't people want more (and clean) energy for the future?


I thought it was shutting down Nuclear in favour of other (far) less convenient green options..?
What's more convient than a green energy source that only works during the day, works unpredictability or both? Wind and solar are fine, but they require grid scale batteries or they are to replace fossil fuels and the price starts climbing a lot closer and maybe even pased nuclear when you consider that.

There are plenty different types of clean energy and we need all of them. The all or nothing adittude towards solar or wind is counter productive and slowing down moving away from coal and fossil fuels.
 
These clowns can't even make decent consumer electronics and no they are going to operate nuclear reactors.

Love the dolts claiming it's clean energy. You can't make this level of stupid up. Please, please put your hand up to store the clean waste if it's so safe. Also, remind us how clean those uranium mines are too.
 
These clowns can't even make decent consumer electronics and no they are going to operate nuclear reactors.

Love the dolts claiming it's clean energy. You can't make this level of stupid up. Please, please put your hand up to store the clean waste if it's so safe. Also, remind us how clean those uranium mines are too.
Those uranium mines are a lot safer than those lithium mines used to make the batteries and nuclear energy is rather clean The storage vault that they want to use that people are said about is actually perfectly safe. Bedrock stops radiation if you really that word about radiation you should just leave the universe because your bathed in it everyday from above there's radiation that comes up from the ground every day as a matter of fact the entire planets crust is just filled with radiation. The key is to put that somewhere where it's properly shielded which would be deep underground in bedrock where it can naturally decay without causing any sort of harm. Here's the trick even if an earthquake happens when it's buried underground under all that bedrock it still is not a danger to anybody.

Nuclear is the safest power option until we figure out fusion, wind and solar are terrible options an argument could be made for space-based microwave radiation power but again that's more of a science fiction SimCity thing than practical.
 
These clowns can't even make decent consumer electronics and no they are going to operate nuclear reactors.

No, Google isn't going to be operating the reactors. That should be obvious even without reading the article. They just have an agreement to buy power from the company that does.
 
Nuclear is the safest power option until we figure out fusion, wind and solar are terrible options an argument could be made for space-based microwave radiation power but again that's more of a science fiction SimCity thing than practical.

Commercial nuclear fusion has been "just around the corner" for some 70 years.. and yet ironically most of this power is going to be used on the "race to AGI", which is "just around the corner" also, and yet similarly completely different fundamentals. Can't make this stuff up.

Given solar is such a poor technology it's a shame I don't pay electricity bills, period, with panels on my roof paying for my own use, as well as a bit of export to make up for nighttime use. I know that's mindblowing to anybody outside of the US.
 
Trickle down infrastructure for our trickle down economy that doesn't even trickle.

What could possibly go wrong?
 
Good. If the AI bubble bursts -- and it will burst -- there'll be all these additional nuclear plants that the world desperately needs.
 
Commercial nuclear fusion has been "just around the corner" for some 70 years.. and yet ironically most of this power is going to be used on the "race to AGI", which is "just around the corner" also, and yet similarly completely different fundamentals. Can't make this stuff up.

Given solar is such a poor technology it's a shame I don't pay electricity bills, period, with panels on my roof paying for my own use, as well as a bit of export to make up for nighttime use. I know that's mindblowing to anybody outside of the US.
No and certain regions solar can work if your region gets consistent sunlight most of the year which does not include most of the heavenly populated areas. Not only that the mineral extraction and mining process necessary to build those panels has a way higher carbon footprint than building a nuclear power plant but you keep doing you
 
Back