GTA 5 Michael actor Ned Luke slams AI chatbot that uses his voice without permission

midian182

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
A hot potato: In the latest example of why so many people dislike the use of AI-generated voices, Ned Luke, the actor who portrays Michael De Santa in GTA 5, has blasted a company for using his voice without permission to create a Michael AI chatbot. Luke added that the technology has also been used to create clips that sound like he is going on racist rants, apparently in an attempt to get him "canceled."

Luke replied to a now-deleted post on X/Twitter from AI company WAME that was promoting its AI Michael chatbot, which lets users engage in "a realistic voice conversation with Michael De Santa," reports PCGamesN.

Luke confirmed that neither the actor nor Rockstar were asked for permission to use his voice to create the chatbot. "This is f**king bulls**t WAME," he said. "Absolutely nothing cool about ripping people off with some lame computer estimation of my voice. Don't waste your time on this garbage." The actor then added "Grand Theft Vocal" and referenced the game by including a five-star wanted rating.

Luke tagged Rockstar Games and the SAG-AFTRA actors union in his post. There has been a lot of anger from those within the industry recently over SAG-AFTRA reaching an agreement on the use of AI voices that it says is "fair," though many voice actors say they weren't asked for their feedback on the deal.

WAME has now removed the Michael chatbot and all mention of the AI. "In light of the recent controversy surrounding the utilization of Mr Ned Luke's voice in our application, we at WAME wish to express our profound understanding and concern," the company told PCGamesN. "This incident has highlighted the intricate interplay between the advancement of AI technology and the ethical and legal realms."

"WAME commits to protecting the rights of voice actors and creators while advancing ethical AI practices. We believe this controversy serves as a pivotal moment in harmonizing AI technology with relevant legal statutes."

The posts caught the attention of another voice actor who has played a part in a Rockstar Games franchise: Roger Clark, who portrayed Arthur Morgan in Red Dead Redemption 2. He said that the real Micheal would never be replaced. Luke replied that his anger was directed primarily at the chatbot's creators and SAG-AFTRA.

Luke also claimed that an AI-generated voice based on his likeness was being used to create racist diatribes. "I have assholes using AI to create bulls*** racist rants to try get me canceled," he said. "This is dangerous f***ing sh** that needs to be addressed ASAP."

Voice actors have been speaking out against AI recreations of their voices for months. We heard in February that many were being forced to sign away the rights to their voice as part of a role, and there were reports in October of entry-level artists losing work to virtual recreations.

One of the more high-profile instances of an AI voice clone being used was done by CD Projekt Red. The company used a voice generated from Milogost Reczek, who had voiced Viktor Vektor in Cyberpunk 2077's Polish version, for Phantom Liberty, following the actor's death in 2021.

Doug Cockle, the actor who famously voices Geralt of Rivia in The Witcher game series, recently told IGN that the use of AI was "Inevitable" but "Dangerous."

Permalink to story.

https://www.techspot.com/news/101527-gta-5-actor-ned-luke-slams-fking-bullst.html

 
Furriest said:
Completely fair, people profiteering off of echoes of your voice is conceptually bankrupt and needs to be regulated into the ground.
Click to expand...
Exactly, especially when they try and make you say racist diatribes that you would never even think about saying, pretty dangerous ground, not that I think AI voices usually sound good, they tend to be as good at portraying any emotion or inflection in a voice as a dying fish, but even a broken clock strikes right twice a day, and it only takes one ***** going "oh my god he said x" to stir up a s**tstorm
 
Furriest said:
Completely fair, people profiteering off of echoes of your voice is conceptually bankrupt and needs to be regulated into the ground.
Click to expand...

Human voice imitators have existed for a very long time, often having successful careers in comedy circuits. If there's no problem with that, what's the distinction line that makes it okay for humans to do it but not okay for AI?

You also run into the reality that, even if it is wide, there isn't an infinite range of possible human voices. It will eventually, inevitably, lead to an AI voice being created that sounds exactly like a real person or persons, despite never having being trained directly on their voices at all. What then?

I don't claim to have the answer(s) to hand, but the argument that it's entirely bad and needs to be stopped seems to lack the necessary nuances of reality. There is probably a middle ground somewhere between "wild west" and "ban it all".
 
  • Like
Reactions: m4a4
The moral ambiguity on this subject centers around cloning someones voice to discredit or ruin their reputation. Does a kid on youtube who can imitate a celebrity's voice for comical purposes have to ask permission? When AI can accurately generate emotional tones, its when things get dangerous. That said, all AI content (audio or video) should have a tag/watermark/whatever saying its AI generated , for all social media platforms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Godel
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

midian182
  • Locked
Joe Biden says he wants to ban AI voice impersonations
2
Replies
35
Views
518
USAvenger
USAvenger
midian182
SXSW festival crowd responds to AI promo video with chorus of boos
Replies
7
Views
154
erickmendes
erickmendes
A
Broadcom showcases huge XPU AI accelerator for mystery client
Replies
0
Views
86
Alfonso Maruccia
A

Latest posts

Back