captaincranky
Posts: 19,684 +8,825
You would never bore me by telling me of your accomplishments, only by bragging about a lack of them.jobeard said:Well for one, I passed the course.
Btw; I'll not bore you with my resume but just say I've been down this road for 37years.
captaincranky said:>>But, anything mechanical with little teensy tiny, little bits of magnetism holding all that you are, should not be taken all that seriously
jobeard said:Hum; I guess those folks at IBM have been wrong for over six decades now.
Backups have been on 2400 ft tapes and secondary HDs.
In these circumstances I'm guessing that we're talking about climate controlled environments in which nobody is likely to be running a circular saw next to a shelf of tapes, so fair enough.
The materials certainly have improved, polyester vs Nitrocellulose backings on film and tape. Since you mention longevity you'll probably be aware of how many wonderful old movies were lost due to the (almost) explosive Nitrocellulose film stock. Magnetic tape emulsion binders can fail also, and at the end of the day, there's no such thing a absolute permanence, just empires under the sands.
I'm hoping you'll accept this reply as not even lukewarm.jobeard said:Let's agree to flame each other using Private Messages .. that way the original thread will still have some meaningful content.
There actually still is a fair amount of meaningful content in this thread, once you wipe the venom off. <JOKING.