Intel is being questioned over CEO Lip-Bu Tan's China ties and Cadence case

midian182

Posts: 11,624   +176
Staff member
What just happened? It seems that Intel just can't catch a break these days. After the struggling company saw its credit rating reduced to two points above junk status this week, US lawmakers are now questioning CEO Lip-Bu Tan's ties to Chinese firms, as well as a criminal case involving his former company, Cadence Design Systems.

US Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board of directors to express "concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security."

As reported by Reuters, Cotton asked in the letter to Intel chairperson Frank Yeary if the board is aware of the subpoenas sent to Cadence during Tan's time there as CEO before Intel hired him, and what measures were being taken to address these concerns.

Cadence Design Systems admitted to knowingly exporting restricted electronic design automation tools and semiconductor IP to China's National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) and its alias entities from 2015 to 2021. Tan ran Cadence as CEO from 2008 through 2021 and was executive chairman until May 2023.

The company pled guilty last week and agreed to pay over $140 million in combined criminal and civil penalties while implementing enhanced compliance controls.

Cotton also raises questions about Tan's ties to China. He notes that as Intel is involved in the Secure Enclave program – a Biden-era initiative designed to ensure a trusted, domestically-controlled supply of chips for defense and intelligence systems – Tan must adequately disclose other ties to Chinese companies. As Intel receives federal funding under the initiative, Cotton asked about Tan's disclosures related to investment, professional roles, or other ties to Chinese companies.

There's also a question about whether Intel required Tan to divest from chip firms linked to the Chinese military or Communist Party.

"Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations," Cotton wrote. "Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations."

Tan has invested millions into Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms, mostly through his VC firm, Walden. The report notes that it is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, even when they have ties to the Chinese military, but not if they have been added to the US Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List. Reuters writes that there is no evidence that Tan has invested directly in any company on this list.

To say Intel isn't having a good time right now is an understatement. The company's credit rating was slashed to two steps above junk status by Fitch earlier this week. We then heard that its 18A process has been hit by low yields and quality issues, putting its manufacturing comeback in doubt.

Permalink to story:

 
Did Intel's board literally put a Manchurian Candidate in charge of Intel?

Or is this just good old fashioned racism?

I'm sure our totally unbiassed and highly regarded intelligence and security apparatuses will come tot he rescue!
 
Did Intel's board literally put a Manchurian Candidate in charge of Intel?

Or is this just good old fashioned racism?

I'm sure our totally unbiassed and highly regarded intelligence and security apparatuses will come tot he rescue!
probably both, place someone who can bring em down from the inside, then make them untouchable with the ol "thats racist" play.
 
Globalization at it's best. Send all jobs to China and then wonder why China becomes world power player.
They were smart. They did things like entering into JV's with foreign companies like GM and AMD and learned from them. Obtained access to the most number of lithium and cobalt mines. Working with Africans. Building infrastructure there in exchange for access to mining. They dominate in renewable energies. EV sales. China leads almost everywhere but AI. Started back in the 70's when they opened up trade with the US and others. The west is miles behind China. They're in it for the long haul.
 
Last edited:
They were smart. They did things like entering into JV's with foreign companies like GM and AMD and learned from them. Obtained access to the most number of lithium and cobalt mines. Working with Africans. Building infrastructure there in exchange for access to mining. They dominate in renewable energies. EV sales. China leads almost everywhere but AI. Started back in the 70's when they opened up trade with the US and others. The west is miles behind China. They're in it for the long haul.

- China is basically what it looks like when a country is actually run like a business, instead of the lip service conservatives and republicans give to the concept.
 
The West noticing the Asian Markets are moving faster than them. I presume Intel and maybe others have seen this a long time ago and have to make their move. All the while Silicon Valley is having challenges with AI and the world knows this. If we don't move our behind, other Countries will. Are we going to see a resurgence of China in AI as what they did in manufacturing?
 
Last edited:
- China is basically what it looks like when a country is actually run like a business, instead of the lip service conservatives and republicans give to the concept.

First, I don't understand what politics has to do with this in any way. The only way your statement works is if the other side (that was in charge 12 of the last 16 years) did more than paying lip service as well and we weren't in this mess. In fact, during those twelve years, they actually set up regulations that drove business off shore thinking we could become a 100% service economy. Needless to say, that didn't work.

As far as Tan is concerned, why would the board check on him? The board could care less if the largest US chip producer goes down the tubes. All they want is for him make the books look good enough to let them get out with the most money. They have no desire to gamble on boom or bust by risking it all in order to try to get Intel back on track. They just want to offload the pieces, same goal as China.
 
If they force the new CEO out, I think the odds of Intel surviving will slip further. The company needs a clear and bold direction. The frequent change in leadership and flip flopping in decision does not help. Hence, I am more and more convinced that Intel won’t make the turnaround that we hope for.
 
Tan has already proven to be a disaster in a just a few short months. Not sure what this clown sees as the future for Intel, but he's talking Intel down to anyone that will listen and they are spiralling out of control under him. Gelsinger inherited a lot of baggage and rather than fire him, they should have gotten rid of the entire board and plenty of upper management dead weight.
 
Globalization at it's best. Send all jobs to China and then wonder why China becomes world power player.
Too late. That all began in earnest on the 80's with growing corporate greed. China thinks in terms of decades, not quarters.
 
They were smart. They did things like entering into JV's with foreign companies like GM and AMD and learned from them. Obtained access to the most number of lithium and cobalt mines. Working with Africans. Building infrastructure there in exchange for access to mining. They dominate in renewable energies. EV sales. China leads almost everywhere but AI. Started back in the 70's when they opened up trade with the US and others. The west is miles behind China. They're in it for the long haul.
By this time it is obvious China will dominate world politics for entirety of 21st century. They got extremely lucky with Dan Xiaoping genius and continue to develop. I sure hope Huawei return to our markets, they had the best phones and the only serious competition to Apple devices.
 
By this time it is obvious China will dominate world politics for entirety of 21st century. They got extremely lucky with Dan Xiaoping genius and continue to develop. I sure hope Huawei return to our markets, they had the best phones and the only serious competition to Apple devices.
Maybe in the second half of the century. They are not dominant now, but certainly are getting close and are highly influential.
 
By this time it is obvious China will dominate world politics for entirety of 21st century. They got extremely lucky with Dan Xiaoping genius and continue to develop. I sure hope Huawei return to our markets, they had the best phones and the only serious competition to Apple devices.
I've heard so many negative things about other countries, I almost have to assume at least half of it is lies.
 
Back