Kioxia says its new QLC SSDs can match TLC performance at lower cost

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,515   +935
Staff
In a nutshell: While it gained its own brand only after spinning off from Toshiba in 2018, the Kioxia team was a major driving force in the development of flash memory technology during the 1980s. Now, the Japanese memory manufacturer is looking to ease storage demand in the consumer space, as the AI frenzy turns nearly every piece of computer hardware into an unattainable luxury.

Kioxia has announced the EG7 series of solid-state drives, the company's first SSD line built around its quadruple-level cell (QLC) technology, branded as BiCS FLASH. Despite using QLC NAND, the new SSDs are said to deliver performance comparable to TLC-based drives – at least according to Kioxia. However, the EG7 series does not include any DRAM cache, which raises questions about how it achieves its advertised performance levels.

Kioxia claims its BiCS FLASH QLC memory can deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,000 MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 6,200 MB/s. The drives will be available in 512GB, 1TB, and 2TB capacities, and are rated for random read and write performance of up to 1,000 KIOPS.

The EG7 series will be offered in M.2 2230, 2242, and 2280 form factors, making them compatible with a wide range of PC configurations and space constraints. Additional specifications include support for the NVMe 2.0d protocol, PCIe 4.0 compliance, and always-on self-encryption via TCG Opal 2.0.

Kioxia's new SSDs are DRAM-less units designed to leverage Host Memory Buffer (HMB) technology to improve I/O performance. HMB allows the SSD to use a portion of the system's main DRAM via the PCIe bus for caching tasks. According to Kioxia's announcement, this "mature" technology is intended to improve cost efficiency, power consumption, and overall drive performance.

With the new EG7 series, Kioxia is specifically targeting value-oriented PC designs such as slim laptops, mainstream consumer notebooks, and entry-level desktop pre-built systems. The drives are already shipping to several unnamed OEMs, with the first systems expected to reach the market in the second quarter of the year.

Kioxia also emphasized the growing need for affordable storage components in the PC market, as major tech companies and hyperscalers continue to absorb large volumes of supply to support AI data center expansion. Earlier this year, Shunsuke Nakato, managing director of Kioxia's memory division, suggested that consumers may no longer see 1TB SSDs priced below $50 in the future.

According to Vice President Axel Stoermann, modern client storage customers must strike a careful balance between performance, efficiency, and cost. In practical terms, this likely means paying more for less capacity while adjusting expectations accordingly.

Image credit: Kyodo News

Permalink to story:

 
Eh, qlc isnt as terrible as people say it is. It has its place and that place isn't in enthusiast systems. With modern sizes you have to go out if your way to reach the capacity limit and it does have a latency advantage over HDDs. I wouldn't put one in a gaming system but for an internet browsing machine QLC is fine and the added cost of better SSDs isn't justified.
 
Eh, qlc isnt as terrible as people say it is. It has its place and that place isn't in enthusiast systems. With modern sizes you have to go out if your way to reach the capacity limit and it does have a latency advantage over HDDs. I wouldn't put one in a gaming system but for an internet browsing machine QLC is fine and the added cost of better SSDs isn't justified.
Given that QLC is slower mainly at writes, then for applications like a Steam/GamePass etc game drive it's fine. You write the games only once (plus patches) and will generally be bottlenecked by download speeds not the speed of the drive, and the QLC will load the games at a decent rate.
 
Given that QLC is slower mainly at writes, then for applications like a Steam/GamePass etc game drive it's fine. You write the games only once (plus patches) and will generally be bottlenecked by download speeds not the speed of the drive, and the QLC will load the games at a decent rate.
If I had to choose between two SSDs and the only difference was the cost then I'd pick TLC or SLC, but it's not that simple. For basic machines they're fine, but if you're the type of guy that's installing multiple 100+GB every month the you're gonna burn through all the writes pretty quickly. I guess if you have an 8TB drive then you might not, but I wouldn't want to store 8TB on a QLC drive. If you're looking at store that much data and paying that much of a,premiu, going with better tech is the way to go. Frankly, I think the perfect size for a plc drive is about 1TB. Give you room to grow of you need it but if the drive dies you don't lose tons of data. Everyone says backup your data, but how many people really take data security seriously? I just rely on the RAID on my NAS and that's my idea of multiple backups. I keep copys of my important stuff in my desktop, laptop and my NAS but I don't think that really counts as the 3-2-1 rule of data storage
 
Back