Leaked documents reveal Amazon aims to replace 600,000 US workers with robots

midian182

Posts: 11,628   +176
Staff member
A hot potato: Amazon has spent years introducing new and more sophisticated robots to its warehouses, all while insisting that they won't replace employees or take jobs meant for humans. But a new report citing leaked company documents reveals the tech giant hopes the robots will fill more than 600,000 US positions it would have had to hire for by 2033.

Amazon's embrace of warehouse robots, especially those of the humanoid variety, has been worrying human workers for years. A new report by The New York Times suggests those concerns were warranted.

Citing interviews and internal strategy documents, the publication writes that Amazon's robotics team aims to automate 75% of all operations at the company, thereby eliminating 160,000 positions that would have otherwise been required by 2027.

While it's not going to make for good PR, the move would save Amazon 30 cents on every item delivered from its warehouses to customers. Automation is expected to save Amazon $12.6 billion from 2025 to 2027 alone.

What's even more jarring is that Amazon estimates it will sell around twice as many products by 2033 – so, more profit and fewer human employees to pay.

Amazon reportedly knows that there will be an inevitable backlash against the job losses. As such, leaked materials show executives have been considering taking part in community projects. They've also considered avoiding direct terms such as "AI" and "automation," preferring to opt for "advanced technology." Even the toe-curlingly bad "cobot" has been considered for robots that work alongside humans.

Amazon responded to the report by insisting that the documents were incomplete and didn't represent its overall hiring strategy. It also denied the claims about telling execs to avoid certain terms when discussing robot plans.

Nobel Prize winner Daron Acemoglu told The NYT that "nobody else has the same incentive as Amazon to find the way to automate."

"Once they work out how to do this profitably, it will spread to others, too," Acemoglu added, warning that if Amazon succeeds, "one of the biggest employers in the United States will become a net job destroyer, not a net job creator."

At the start of July, Amazon announced that it had deployed its millionth robot across its warehouse operations. Automation-related job losses have long been a concern in a company that loves its robots, but the introduction of the humanoid Digit exacerbated those fears in 2023.

Both Amazon and manufacturer Agility Robotics insisted the machines wouldn't replace workers, merely take over their monotonous tasks – something we used to hear all the time with AI. But the robots' ranks have continued to swell with more advanced models, including one with a sense of touch, and there have been numerous reports of the company potentially saving billions by introducing more automation.

Permalink to story:

 
Amazon has no ethics. What did you expect?
I wonder if anyone actually went to work for them thinking they'd build a brighter future rather than exploiting humans for maximum profit? You don't have to work for Amazon, but if you're gonna bend over, they'll gladly accept you.
 
Honestly? I can't say that I oppose this. Replacing (more) manual labour jobs with robots is fine by me. It's what technology has been doing for ages.
 
Criticizing Amazon as a monopolistic behemoth with questionable practices is fair game—maybe even necessary. But blaming capitalism every time Amazon—or any large company—makes a business decision like cutting jobs completely misses the point.

Capitalism, flawed as it is, remains the only economic system proven to drive large-scale innovation, growth, and upward mobility. It powered the 20th and 21st century global economy, lifting billions out of poverty. Even China’s authoritarian regime has embraced core capitalist principles. Why? Because that’s how you get **** done. It’s why they’re now even remotely capable of challenging the West. Socialism simply doesn’t ****ing work. It’s not a better way to distribute resources—it’s a reliable way to wreck economies and kill incentives. Even a cursory education in world governance history proves that point, full stop.

Amazon literally started in a dude’s garage. You don’t have to like it. Perhaps respect it—cause that’s called, effort.

Trotting out the tired, entitled “capitalism is evil” mantra is the weakest sauce.

Upset about corporate power or lack of regulation? Good. Get involved! Become a team player in the system. Push for smarter policies, stronger competition, and more accountability.

What doesn’t work? Siting on the sidelines, whining about how the system is unfair, waving a peaceful-protest banner. Lazy.

Go start a business and build something. Learn how value—and jobs—are actually created. Be a valuable part of the solution instead of complaining. Nobody owes you anything.
 
It is kinda sad. First, amazing is literally squeezing small businesses. Then it boots people who have nowhere to work because all the places where they could have worked closed because of Amazon.

I used to get annoyed with movies presenting corporations as the greatest evil of their story. Maybe they were up to something.

The problem is that people who are against corporations are also the ones that want to make drastic changing that stink of communism. In a way, corporations are increasing a chance for these drastic changes to become reality because there are too many poor people who have nowhere to work and get a decent salary.
 
These are the mundane boring af jobs that robots should be doing. People are just pissed, because now they have to actually not be dumb ucks and get some sort of education and better themselves. Oh the horror...
Education is quickly losing value with AI getting so good. And it is not that there wont be any jobs left for humans. There will always be jobs. But the best will compete for those.
Not to mention that our education system quickly evolves into indoctrination system, filling kids heads with shite. I wish they were pretending to be a mahgic school rather than spread their ideology. Kids would be better off learning spells than learning how the world works from these ideological lunatics.
 
Criticizing Amazon as a monopolistic behemoth with questionable practices is fair game—maybe even necessary. But blaming capitalism every time Amazon—or any large company—makes a business decision like cutting jobs completely misses the point.

Capitalism, flawed as it is, remains the only economic system proven to drive large-scale innovation, growth, and upward mobility. It powered the 20th and 21st century global economy, lifting billions out of poverty. Even China’s authoritarian regime has embraced core capitalist principles. Why? Because that’s how you get **** done. It’s why they’re now even remotely capable of challenging the West. Socialism simply doesn’t ****ing work. It’s not a better way to distribute resources—it’s a reliable way to wreck economies and kill incentives. Even a cursory education in world governance history proves that point, full stop.

Amazon literally started in a dude’s garage. You don’t have to like it. Perhaps respect it—cause that’s called, effort.

Trotting out the tired, entitled “capitalism is evil” mantra is the weakest sauce.

Upset about corporate power or lack of regulation? Good. Get involved! Become a team player in the system. Push for smarter policies, stronger competition, and more accountability.

What doesn’t work? Siting on the sidelines, whining about how the system is unfair, waving a peaceful-protest banner. Lazy.

Go start a business and build something. Learn how value—and jobs—are actually created. Be a valuable part of the solution instead of complaining. Nobody owes you anything.

Sure every poor person is poor just because they're lazy. Explain to me how Basil's has net worth of billions and there's people that work at Amazon that are on state benefits. What a **** take on the situation and yet you have the audacity to just decry everyone poor and lazy.
 
You know what they say if there is smoke there is usually a fire? You can't believe BIG TECH, same as the WHO, and big pharma or any other person or company where there is money involved.

Best start a career in what AI can't do yet?

Let's hope all of this backfires, like really bad. Only way these greedy people learn.
 
Last edited:
Our economy could not come close to functioning without the significant automation it already has, and this is just more obvious step in the evolution. (That sentence has been true for decades worth of advancements.)

What mainstream discussion typically fails into account is what happens next, which at least so far has always that been our ambitions expand into the newly obtainable products & services that would not have been reachable without the new level of automation.

I would love for this workforce to become one of robot supervisors and maintenance techs, watching over a world where household robots can do all my chores and handyman tasks.
 
Amazon has no ethics. What did you expect?
I wonder if anyone actually went to work for them thinking they'd build a brighter future rather than exploiting humans for maximum profit? You don't have to work for Amazon, but if you're gonna bend over, they'll gladly accept you.

Yes, my wife and I bent over to make over 350k per year combined. It was tough. Here's the truth, Amazon does a lot of super difficult things that are going to require intelligent humans who have either gone to school or acquired skills in the trades. Those of us that did, will have jobs. The people who are lazy, and don't bother, they won't have any.

Amazon is offering to train any warehousing/delivery workers who want the training in robotics repairs for free. So those who are in the fulfillment centers should take that. How many would you think are doing so? Probably not many.
 
Sure every poor person is poor just because they're lazy. Explain to me how Basil's has net worth of billions and there's people that work at Amazon that are on state benefits. What a **** take on the situation and yet you have the audacity to just decry everyone poor and lazy.
I know a TON of people that work at Amazon, and the majority of us that work at corporate, or at Kuiper, are making well over 100k per year. Most of the people I know are making over 150k a year actually.
 
These are the mundane boring af jobs that robots should be doing. People are just pissed, because now they have to actually not be dumb ucks and get some sort of education and better themselves. Oh the horror...
This is exactly correct, and not only that, they're offering the fulfillment people free robotics training, but I doubt barely any of them are taking it.
 
I would love for this workforce to become one of robot supervisors and maintenance techs, watching over a world where household robots can do all my chores and handyman tasks.

And Amazon is offering to train any employee who wants it in robotics, but these are generally lazy people with no ambition in the fulfillment centers, and I'd bet my paycheck that less than 1 percent are taking the training.
 
But, if/when too many people cannot support themselves, likewise they will not be able to afford the stuff that Amazon sells. Then, robots will be laid-off. :D

At least the homeless robots will not be pooping in the streets, the way those living in tents or cardboard boxes in San Francisco do-do.
 
But, if/when too many people cannot support themselves, likewise they will not be able to afford the stuff that Amazon sells. Then, robots will be laid-off. :D

At least the homeless robots will not be pooping in the streets, the way those living in tents or cardboard boxes in San Francisco do-do.
Robot revolution is no longer a science fiction
 
"strategy documents", lolololol.....this is no secret. Every company is trying to automate when they can. Amazon has been heavy into robotics forever. Hell, they have their own factory. This article portends to be some sort of revelation, it's not, it's business as usual.
 
We’ve been here before - people once protested printing presses and mechanical looms. I knew a guy who built the new tech.

Each wave of automation threatened old jobs but ultimately expanded prosperity.

The real issue isn’t robots; it’s whether we move fast enough to retrain humans...

AKA - 'get over yourselves'.
 
Sometimes not, I agree — seeing Amazon execs wearing pins supporting a known terrorist state was enough for me; I cancelled Prime on the spot.

That said, credit where due: when my 990 Pro 4 TB failed after two weeks, I opened a return, filled out the form, shipped it back — and got a full refund almost immediately. I was pleased as Punch, honestly. Compared to some of my FleaBay horror shows, that was stellar service.

Back on topic though — Corporations don’t exist to create employment; they exist to generate profit and shareholder value.

***Jobs are a by-product, not the mission.***

And here’s the uncomfortable bit: many people WANT corporations to behave like social institutions, because once they do, they can be politically captured. Get HR talking “values” and “inclusion,” and you’ve got a private-sector mouthpiece for your ideology — with far more reach than government ever had.

When Amazon automates, it’s not betraying some imaginary social contract. It’s doing exactly what it was designed to do: pursue efficiency and profit. The rest of us need to adapt — not moralise.

Amazon has no ethics. What did you expect?
I wonder if anyone actually went to work for them thinking they'd build a brighter future rather than exploiting humans for maximum profit? You don't have to work for Amazon, but if you're gonna bend over, they'll gladly accept you.
 
Back