Loongson CPU approaches traditional x86 performance in new benchmarks

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,025   +302
Staff
A hot potato: China is willing to fight US restrictions on advanced technology with domestically-produced chip products, and the highly-discussed Loongson CPU line is receiving further confirmation regarding its presumed capabilities when compared to traditional x86 microchips.

A few months after unveiling the 3A6000 CPU, Loongson is now enjoying new reviews that seemingly vouch for the processor's prowess and performance levels. Chinese site MyDrivers took the Loongson 3A6000 CPU for a spin, confirming that the chip can achieve "comparable" performance to a three-year-old Intel Core CPU.

MyDrivers tested the 3A6000 model in synthetic benchmarks and found that the chip provides 60 percent more performance in single-core tasks and an impressive 2x performance uplift for multi-core tasks compared to the 3A5000. The Loongson 3A6000 is a quad-core CPU and appears to be more efficient than the previous generation, with true multi-threading support.

The Loongson 3A6000 is based on the new LoongArch architecture, a poorly documented ISA mostly derived from the RISC-based MIPS architecture. MIPS was developed in the US, where it has now been retired in favor of RISC-V. However, Loongson continued to improve the architecture after obtaining official licenses for the MIPS32 and MIPS64 ISAs in 2011. The LoongArch's design supposedly includes elements from both MIPS and RISC-V.

In August, Loongson stated that its newly developed chip was able to achieve performance levels comparable to Intel's 10th-gen Core CPUs released in 2020. Tests conducted by MyDrivers appear to confirm the company's official statements, as the 3A6000 chip was only five percent slower than the i3-10100F and between 10 percent and 15 percent slower than the Ryzen 3 3100 in single-thread and multi-thread workloads.

MyDrivers conducted additional benchmarks as well. In UnixBench, the 3A6000 was two percent slower than the i3-10100F and eight percent slower than the Ryzen 3 3100 in single-core tests, while it was eight percent and 11 percent slower in multi-core loads. If these results prove to be accurate, it confirms that the Loongson CPU technology is indeed evolving and improving much faster than anticipated.

While the Loongson 3A6000 quad-core chip may not yet outperform Comet Lake and Zen 3 CPUs in terms of performance, Loongson appears to be on the right path for success. This is especially true if Beijing's engineers can achieve significantly higher clock rates from the LoongArch architecture, as the 3A6000 chip currently runs at a maximum of 2.5 GHz.

Permalink to story.

 
Well MIPS used to be an extremely high performant CPU Arch that was largely held back due to silicon graphics in its prime. It was not a high volume chipset, used largely only in SG workstations and supercomputers. After the fall of SG the arch was largely only used in the embedded world where performance at low power was a big deal. MIPS CPU's was in the heart of many network appliances.

High end MIPS probably didn't need much to shine again.

China should look into developing their own fab equipment as they are pretty much locked out from purchasing cutting end fab equipment from the west. And I don't see that changing any time soon.
 
Good! We need competition. Even If this one will land only with the red y*llow man, our manufacturers will have to concentrate more on our market and consider their pricing more.
 
Good! We need competition. Even If this one will land only with the red y*llow man, our manufacturers will have to concentrate more on our market and consider their pricing more.

These comments are so ridiculous. Like if a subpar chinese CPUs would change anything for you in the short term for your specific upgrade path...
 
These comments are so ridiculous. Like if a subpar chinese CPUs would change anything for you in the short term for your specific upgrade path...
No, absolutely not, I mean long term. Lots of industries these days relied on China, thinking It will make them grow exponentially, while abandoning Their own markets. Look at automotive, electronics, cinema & gaming, or rail. Chinese just took the investment money and then stole the IP, or If You prefer "reverse engineered", without proper royalties. Huge money they make on manufacturing low quality goods goes into sponsoring dumping prices of cars and electronics, as PRC sponsors such practices. If Chenese buy Their own CPU's and GPUs, Intel, AMD & nVidia will have to concentrate on Their home markets. Imagine RTX 4090 for under $1000. It's easy if you try. No hell below us. Above us, only sky.
 
Good! We need competition. Even If this one will land only with the red y*llow man, our manufacturers will have to concentrate more on our market and consider their pricing more.
There will be no more licences issued for x86-64 so don't hold your breath.
 
It's interesting how China can make such impressive leaps in performance in such a short span.

It makes me wonder if AMD giving them access to their Zen architecture is now biting the US in the rear end.

The last thing you want to do is make a potential military threat stronger and just as capable as you are.
Especially when there are people like Putin, killing innocents with some help from fellow communist Xi.

Especially since Russia is involved in assisting terrorist groups like Hezbollah (and indirectly Hamas) with the military hardware they need to go crazy.
 
Back