Microsoft promises faster Windows 11 boot times and better performance on 8GB PCs

midian182

Posts: 12,003   +183
Staff member
Something to look forward to: Microsoft has vowed to improve Windows 11 for most of this year, and at IFA 2026, the company made a few more promises. The tech giant says that it is preparing to reduce boot times in its latest OS and improve Windows Hello responsiveness. It also reiterated that Windows 11 will run great on 8GB machines.

As reported by Windows Latest, Mark Linton, Corporate Vice President of Windows & Devices at Microsoft, spoke about the improvements being made to Windows 11, including "significant gains on things like boot time, Windows Hello responsiveness..."

"We're continuing to improve on the fundamentals," Linton added. "We're listening to customer feedback, continuously improving Windows, and you'll see those updates as Windows just gets better as the updates come through."

Linton is believed to have been referring to an internal build of Windows 11, rather than live preview builds. Microsoft hasn't confirmed when these particular improvements will reach the Experimental testing channel, or provided performance figures.

If this sounds familiar, it's because we've been hearing these kinds of promises a lot in 2026.

Microsoft outlined a Windows 11 overhaul in March. The company said it would focus on the fundamentals, improving performance and reliability while giving users more control over the interface and Windows Update. It also promised to make File Explorer more responsive and reduce the amount of memory consumed by Windows.

Later reports added a faster Start menu and Search to the plans. Microsoft also formed a team to create native Windows apps instead of the resource-heavy web wrappers blamed for making parts of the operating system feel slow and inconsistent.

Some of the changes have materialized. Windows 11 users can now move and shrink the taskbar, resize the Start menu, and hide unwanted sections. Search has received a cleaner interface and an option to disable web results, while Low Latency Profile can improve the launch speed of Windows components and third-party apps.

Another claim about 8GB machines could raise eyebrows. Microsoft's own 8GB Surface Laptop struggled with Teams calls and froze during basic Google Docs work in a review we covered in July.

There's still little evidence of dramatically lower RAM use or a native-app revolution. Problematic patches also continue to appear, too, including an August update linked to game crashes and unexpected reboots.

Microsoft offers no average Windows 11 boot-time figure, though its guidance recommends that notebooks reach the Start screen within 15 seconds, excluding BIOS initialization. Linton never said how much faster the changes will make the process, but we can all appreciate a faster boot time.

Permalink to story:

 
It took the memory crisis to happen for these companies to admit that they were mismanaging memory requirements left and right for decades.

Now somehow Windows 11 will be capable to run fast with just 8gb of Ram, something even Windows 7 couldn't possibly do over 15 years ago.

That only proof that most computing system requirements most most applications including iOS and Android-OS are overblown.
 
Last edited:
This isn't going to cut it for me.
Microsoft is going to have to offer me HARD CASH to keep my Windows PC's going next to my Apple hardware. |
I'll still refuse to upgrade to W11 though, I cannot be bribed into that.
 
While I hate RAMageddon for buying tech, it is pretty funny to see Microsoft's bloat threatening meaningful market share shift now that RAM costs enough to change normies buying decisions.

I didn't think the Mac Neo was a big deal when it launched but now that 8=>16GB cost $200+ it really is. LOL.
 
If your computer still only has 8GB of ram, the early 00's called and they want their hardware back. Get with the program people, geezus...
Naa, my perfectly fine working laptop (I use it for everything, even gaming) is totally fine so far. It's a 2023 laptop. Not my fault my budget was limited to that. It was that or a weaker video card. In fact, they still sell 8GB laptops TODAY. Its not a thing of the past at all. Rampocalypse brah? All the games I play need faster card, and if I just game, I don't need more ram. I dont have to play the newest 200GB video games either. Back then, it was fine, but in W11.. just opening discord pushes me to 8. It never used to be the case or that bad. Apps are more hungry, and Windows too. I used to be hovering around 3-4. Now im always around 6-7. Its almost double, and for what.... I do the same things, it all looks the same (actually, looks worse) and I just don't know. So much bloat in that OS.

P.s. I also got a DDR5 64GB for my desktop PC, which makes W11 drain around 10GB of ram.. with 0 open programs. Why? I even disable a lot of auto start stuff and still. On W10, im down to 5.5 with that same 64GB PC. All im saying is, 8GB can be fine if you got a plan. W11 makes all planning useless. I even went back to W10 because of that.
 
If your computer still only has 8GB of ram, the early 00's called and they want their hardware back. Get with the program people, geezus...
I actually have a nice fanless 8GB box here waiting for a PSU.
It'll do fine with 8.
But then, it's going to be a file server and won't run Windows.
Personally I firmly believe MS is shooting themsewlves in the foot with the neverending flood of empty promises.
FIX WINDOWS 11 FOR REAL and then maybe they'll regain people's trust.
As for me, I use an Apple desktop and laptop now and I love them to bits.
The desktop has 16 which is plenty, the laptop 24 which is MORE plenty -
I got very lucky: the goverment paid for them...otherwise the laptop would have 16 too...you don't want to know what the 24 cost haha.
My (now OLD ha ha) main/Windows10 PC does some minor duties but will be phased out eventually too I think.
Make no mistake I'm no fanboy: both MS and Apple are run by vultures...Apple delivers though, MS no longer does.
 
If your computer still only has 8GB of ram, the early 00's called and they want their hardware back. Get with the program people, geezus...

*cough* More then 4GB wasn't even an option until we got 64-bit Windows, so Vista was the first OS where going more then 4GB was even viable. That was 2006. And I don't think 16G became standard until midway through the 7 era, so probably early aughts.

Point is thought, Microsoft put a ton of heavy resources features in the OS that, frankly, don't need to be there. Realistically, the OS itself shouldn't need more then a GB or two to run. (Is a Software Engineer; I'm allowed to criticise)
 
Back