Why keep denying the science?
".... This study showed that the impact of vaccination on community transmission of circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 appeared to be not significantly different from the impact among unvaccinated people."
"... this study unfortunately also highlights that the vaccine effect on reducing transmission is minimal in the context of delta variant circulation. These findings have immediate public health implications."
Johns Hopkins:
"THE NEW DATA SAYS THAT A FULLY VACCINATED PERSON WHO EXPERIENCES A BREAKTHROUGH INFECTION CAN SPREAD THE VIRUS JUST AS MUCH AS AN UNVACCINATED PERSON..."
While new data show that vaccinated people can carry high viral loads of SARS-CoV-2, vaccines still prevent the worst outcomes from COVID-19.
publichealth.jhu.edu
All the studies which claim otherwise are early studes, most from the 2021 period.
You're attempting to shame young people into taking a vaccine that is more likely to harm, even kill them, than it is to help them. That's criminal. Covid is, for the very young, significantly less dangerous than the common flu, yet the vaccine itself is otherwise:
"...According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among males aged 12 to 17, about 22 to 36 per 100,000 experienced myocarditis within 21 days after receiving a second vaccine dose...."
In a new study, Yale scientists have identified the immune signature of rare cases of myocarditis among those vaccinated against COVID-19 with mRNA vaccines.
news.yale.edu
I won't go through every single one because it isn't necessary. I can see that you didn't actually open the studies and read them.
For example, from the first link, it reads as following about their sources of information:
1. A recent investigation by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of an outbreak of COVID-19 in a prison in Texas showed the equal presence of infectious virus in the nasopharynx of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.
2.Similarly, researchers in California observed no major differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in terms of SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in the nasopharynx, even in those with proven asymptomatic infection.
What you failed to disclose/understand are the following:
1. The first study was done in a very closed environment, a prison.
Here's the report summary of this particular case:
"What is already known about this topic?
Incarcerated populations have experienced disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19–related illness and death.
What is added by this report?
During a COVID-19 outbreak involving the Delta variant in a highly vaccinated incarcerated population, transmission rates were high, even among vaccinated persons. Although attack rates, hospitalizations, and deaths were higher among unvaccinated than among vaccinated persons, duration of positive serial test results was similar for both groups. Infectious virus was cultured from vaccinated and unvaccinated infected persons."
Let me put it in bold:
"attack rates, hospitalizations, and deaths were higher among unvaccinated"
2. The second study also done mainly for the delta variant of the virus in 2021 on a small sample pool with only 25% being fully vaccinated (the study acknowledges this).
This is a quote from the study:
" Interestingly, the viral loads decreased more rapidly in vaccinated than unvaccinated individuals in Singapore, suggesting that vaccinated individuals may remain infectious for shorter periods of time. "
This means that they only looked at the data for virus concentrations of the samples provided by their sources. They quote other studies, the Singapore one measured
the period of time somebody is infectious.
Seriously, why do anti-vaxxer post things without reading them? Thanks for proving I was right with scientific evidence.