Of course that's not the expectation. The point is and I really can't make this any clearer than I already have, for the same money you can get boards that will easily run 200 watt CPUs, so spending the same money on 90-120 watt limit boards is silly and the products themselves need not exist, they're just a consumer trap. Why people are trying to make excuses for such products or come up with scenarios where they don't suck is beyond me.First let me thank you for all your hard work.
My question is related to new Zen 5 cpu's, are we expecting 125-350W parts only?
For me a "a more powerful AM5 processor in the future" can be a 9600x or 9800x 3D cache or not and if they keep it under 90W should be fine.
Cheers mate!
Where is the coolest motherboard?
MSI B650M-PROJECT-ZERO
no cables on the front !!!
https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/B650M-PROJECT-ZERO
Where is the coolest motherboard?
MSI B650M-PROJECT-ZERO
no cables on the front !!!
https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/B650M-PROJECT-ZERO
It's a $230+ US board, so not exactly a candidate for a budget board roundup.
My cheap board from 2011 has like 50 usb ports and more audio holes... why all of these have so few? They even cost 135+... this is why I got a 450 bucks board for my 7800X3D. The cheap options are literally bare-bones. That was not the case for my i5-2500k.
The only way I could use all my USB devices from 2011 was to buy an expensive board. Going cheap would kill half of the things I currently use. Many new boards only have 4 SATA ports too...Most boards pre 2017 used to have like 6-8. So what? I should not use my drives cus suddenly they felt like we dont need Sata ports anymore? I could make them USB drives, but again... there are too few USB ports. There is no optical audio too, on most boards, or 5.1 setups. They are only sold in the super expensive motherboards, something I used to have for 65 DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyways, I know we are living in the future. All my complaints are cus I got older tech, which is still perfectly working. It's good enough for me too. It's like Windows 11 again. MS told us that we can't upgrade our amazing computers from 2017 cus they are just old and useless now. I don't think so. I use my old laptop and PC daily, works AMAZINGLY well in 2024, but can't be upgraded to W11. Cus buy new tech yo. I guess im the stupid 1, I need to just use 2TB SSDS for storage. We all know how good SSD's are for storage, right? I mean, that and also how cost effective... ;p Just give us boards with 0 Sata/USB ports, do it, I dare ya!!
P.s. My $450 board after 11 bios updates still boots for 3-4m. All settings are set, fast boot, in bios stuff, ram speeds. That bug still plagues many people on the forums, not just me. Anyways, At least 7800X3D drains like 35-40 W during gaming, totally magical CPU.
I did not say is the cheaper I say is the coolest))Not to mention that it has a very limited amount of compatible cases (due to some connections being on the bottom of the MB). Most are in the $160-$200 range, so again not very conducive to a budget build, other than the MSI MAG PANO M100R PZ mATX case ($110). It is a cool looking board though.
Ohhh... I had the wrong impression. I was under the belief that these boards were a good deal less expensive than their contemporaries (or at least it seemed that way).Of course that's not the expectation. The point is and I really can't make this any clearer than I already have, for the same money you can get boards that will easily run 200 watt CPUs, so spending the same money on 90-120 watt limit boards is silly and the products themselves need not exist, they're just a consumer trap. Why people are trying to make excuses for such products or come up with scenarios where they don't suck is beyond me.
As I said earlier if they were $80 US or less they might make sense, especially if the power limits were clearly indicated to the buyer.
It's a $230+ US board, so not exactly a candidate for a budget board roundup.
No worries, from the article...Ohhh... I had the wrong impression. I was under the belief that these boards were a good deal less expensive than their contemporaries (or at least it seemed that way).
If they're similar in price, then please disregard everything I said because I totally misunderstood. You're 100% right Steve!
(...as usual).