AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 10th Anniversary Edition Review

My main system has an original 5800x3D, my kids system has a 5600x

Both perform well. I was tempted to upgrade the faster system to AM5, but never could justify the cost. Now I certainly can't.

Still tempted to swap out the 5600x for a 5800X3D but in reality, my kids aren't going to notice the difference.
 
I upgraded from a 1700X to a regular 5800X (non-X3D version), several years ago. It was an impressive upgrade for a very competitive price.

That's why I would never take the Intel option mentioned in the article. I prefer to invest in a platform that will be supported in a longer period of time.
 
I'll stick to my AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, unless I find it dirty cheap.
Why? It's one of the cheapest upgrades you can make for your current platform and if the chip ever goes out of stock again the prices will sky rocket on the second hand market, just like before. To get an upgrade if you even can't buy a 5800x3d you'd have to buy a new motherboard and RAM along with a new CPU.

I upgraded from a 5950x to a 9800x3d, since I had to replace the entire platform I have an extra motherboard, CPU and RAM I'm going to hand down to a good friend of mine. But instead of sending the 5950x I'm replacing it with a 5800x3d and sending it to my friend who is still on a 9900k. Should be a nice upgrade for him.
 
Last edited:
I was lucky enough to buy enough DDR5 RAM at a decent price before peak RAMpocalypse, which allowed me to upgrade to AM5.. but if the 5800X3D had been available (at non-stupid prices) back then I would have definitely stayed with AM4, and saved a fair bit of $
 
Upgraded a friend's CPU last weekend with a 5800X3D, replacing his 3600 and adding a new cooler. He's a happy chappy again.

Ironically, he paid $10 AUD less for the new 5800X3D then when he originally started looking at upgrading back in 2022.
 
Why? It's one of the cheapest upgrades you can make for your current platform and if the chip ever goes out of stock again the prices will sky rocket on the second hand market, just like before. To get an upgrade if you even can't buy a 5800x3d you'd have to buy a new motherboard and RAM along with a new CPU.

I upgraded from a 5950x to a 9800x3d, since I had to replace the entire platform I have an extra motherboard, CPU and RAM I'm going to hand down to a good friend of mine. But instead of sending the 5950x I'm replacing it with a 5800x3d and sending it to my friend who is still on a 9900k. Should be a nice upgrade for him.
Hmm, worth checking. I'm not sure if my AiO H100 v2 is enough, but I'd like to get rid of it.
 

I upgraded from a 1700X to a regular 5800X (non-X3D version), several years ago. It was an impressive upgrade for a very competitive price.

That's why I would never take the Intel option mentioned in the article. I prefer to invest in a platform that will be supported in a longer period of time.
AM4 had excellent longevity, and going from a 1700X to a 5800X on the same board proves it. But the 5800X3D is also essentially the end of that platform’s upgrade path. Your next meaningful upgrade will require a new motherboard and DDR5 anyway, so “future platform support” isn’t really an advantage for that purchase today.
 
AM4 had excellent longevity, and going from a 1700X to a 5800X on the same board proves it. But the 5800X3D is also essentially the end of that platform’s upgrade path. Your next meaningful upgrade will require a new motherboard and DDR5 anyway, so “future platform support” isn’t really an advantage for that purchase today.
Waiting for AM6 can also be a good strategy if one's system isn't struggling.
 
I'd have picked up 5900X3D had they actually went forward with it. Sure, it wouldn't have been any better than the 5800X3D in games, but the extra cores for multithreading would still benefit me when I need them.

At the rate AMD is releasing new, old CPUs, maybe the 5900X3D will just magically show up on the shelf and surprise us all!
 
This kind of performance for this price has been available since the original release of the 5800X3D. There was a two or three year period where you could get better performance for a little bit more in the 7700X and 9700X and get a modern platform. Why didn't people upgrade then if they thought this was a good price? If they were waiting for something better, then they should keep waiting.
 
This kind of performance for this price has been available since the original release of the 5800X3D. There was a two or three year period where you could get better performance for a little bit more in the 7700X and 9700X and get a modern platform. Why didn't people upgrade then if they thought this was a good price? If they were waiting for something better, then they should keep waiting.
They thought its price will go down.
Instead it disappeared.
 
I'm really debating if going from my 5900X to this one. Actually, for some reason I had to disable some cores on my cpu, so I virtually have a 5800X. Was planning on upgrading to AM5, but didn't do it on time and now it's almost impossible. My GPU is a 9070 XT, I wonder if this 5800X3D would eliminate the stutters I've been having in some games.
 
I upgraded from a 1700X to a regular 5800X (non-X3D version), several years ago. It was an impressive upgrade for a very competitive price.

That's why I would never take the Intel option mentioned in the article. I prefer to invest in a platform that will be supported in a longer period of time.
Huh? That is the problem with the 5800 x3d. It has no upgrade path at all. If you price it out, an AM5 9600x system only costs about a couple hundred more, with a great upgrade path. Even the 250k plus could be upgraded to a 270k.
 
Back