Next-gen air conditioning: new electrocaloric material could replace harmful refrigerants

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,025   +302
Staff
In a nutshell: Traditional air conditioners and heat pumps employ refrigerant gas to cool down or heat up homes and buildings, bringing potential harm to the environment. A team of European scientists is trying to solve the issue by using new, experimental materials made out of ceramic.

A study recently published in Science describes a new "electrocaloric" material, an air conditioning technology designed to perform its cooling (or warming) duties without using dangerous or potentially polluting gases. By combining a number of existing techniques, scientists from the Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology in Belvaux have developed a new prototype based on ceramic with a strong electrocaloric effect.

An electrocaloric system heats up when exposed to electric fields, as electrically imbalanced atoms in the material are forced to align in a single direction like in a hair comb. Entropy levels are reduced, and the aligned atoms start vibrating faster, making the temperature rise.

The new prototype uses a fluid flowing between slabs of the ceramic-like material to remove the extra heat. If the electric field is switched off, the effect is reversed with the material becoming colder than ambient temperature and removing heat from the fluid. And then the cycle can start again.

The electrocaloric prototype has shown "superlative performance," materials scientist Neil Mathur at the University of Cambridge remarks. When employed in a refrigerator or an air conditioner, the new material would be used to disperse heat outside a building while keeping the interior environment cold. Conversely, a heat pump would cool down the external environment by extracting heat from it and bringing it inside.

Existing conditioning systems are very efficient, but they need refrigerants such as hydrofluorocarbons or ammonia, which can have direct and indirect greenhouse effects. The electrocaloric prototype has no need for dangerous gases, and it could also be manufactured in smaller, simpler form factors as it removes the need for a compressor.

Despite showing some remarkable capabilities, the prototype technology is not yet ready for commercialization. The Luxembourg scientists need to further refine the tech, increasing the efficiency of the new material. Making the electrocaloric heat pump competitive with the one employed in existing air conditioning systems is their number one priority right now.

Permalink to story.

 
You mean those same refrigerants that were sold to us as fixing the environmental issues of the previous, cheaper refrigerants, which themselves were sold on the same principal?

Conveniently, the patent on r134a ran out recently. I'm sure that has nothing to do with it.
Its the nature of "Research and Development" to find things that are better and better as time progresses. No doubt, even this will be replaced in time with something better. At the time you were "sold" the new refrigerants you spoke of, they were better than the previous refrigerants. Instantaneous perfection is an illusion; however, it does not mean the science is invalid.

IMO, its really not much different from computer components which have gotten better and better over time. Back in the day (or "ancient times" :laughing: if you will) 16KB of RAM took up an entire single-width rack cabinet and was entirely based on vacuum tubes - which consume far more energy than today's RAM where you can hold 1TB in the palm of your hand. Without science, computer components would fail to advance and improve, obviously.
 
Last edited:
Its the nature of "Research and Development" to find things that are better and better as time progresses. No doubt, even this will be replaced in time with something better. At the time you were "sold" the new refrigerants you spoke of, they were better than the previous refrigerants. Instantaneous perfection is an illusion; however, it does not mean the science is invalid.

IMO, its really not much different from computer components which have gotten better and better over time. Back in the day (or "ancient times" :laughing: if you will) 16KB of RAM took up an entire single-width rack cabinet and was entirely based on vacuum tubes - which consume far more energy than today's RAM where you can hold 4TB in the palm of your hand. Without science, computer components would fail to advance and improve, obviously.

R134a isn't better. I actually performs more poorly on it's own versus R12.
 
Gee, uses ELECTRICITY to cool/heat. Battery powered cars use electricity to recharge.
If globalist get their way, your oven, furnace etc will use electricity as well.
Everything will be 100% powered by electricity. At least in the USA, the grid can barely handle
the demand. So, with smart meters and what not, the government will be "forced" to control how
much juice you use. Sorry...you have used too much electricity this money. We are going to shut
off your use. You can either recharge your car, cook food, or heat/cool your home. You pick.
 
Oh, so in other words, our wealthy overlords want to price the plebeians out of affording luxuries such as air conditioning. Got it.
Gee, uses ELECTRICITY to cool/heat. Battery powered cars use electricity to recharge.
If globalist get their way, your oven, furnace etc will use electricity as well.
Everything will be 100% powered by electricity. At least in the USA, the grid can barely handle
the demand. So, with smart meters and what not, the government will be "forced" to control how
much juice you use. Sorry...you have used too much electricity this money. We are going to shut
off your use. You can either recharge your car, cook food, or heat/cool your home. You pick.

 
R134a isn't better. I actually performs more poorly on it's own versus R12.
How it performs as a coolant is not necessarily the reason it was developed. There's this thing called the "ozone layer". Look it up and the effects that previous refrigerants had ont it. That was the reason for the "change". But, thanks for proving my point.
 
How it performs as a coolant is not necessarily the reason it was developed. There's this thing called the "ozone layer". Look it up and the effects that previous refrigerants had ont it. That was the reason for the "change". But, thanks for proving my point.
Right, development started a few years before the patent ran out, and the ozone layer fear mongering began when the patent ran out. The same thing was tried with r134a (ZOMG CO2!!!1!!!!1!!) and the government WAS moving to ban it just like they did with r134a, except for the slightly annoying issue of its replacement, r1234a, being flammable under pressure.....like when an air conditioner fails. OOPS. Oh, and it also decays into a PFCA, a persistent organic pollution.

Reminder: r134a was sold as a "100 year global warming improvement" but now is seen as a "major danger to global warming". Which started in 2012. The same year the patent ran out. Total coincidence I'm sure.

Per Wikipedia: "In the atmosphere, HFO-1234yf degrades to trifluoroacetic acid,[22] which is a mildly phytotoxic[23] strong organic acid[24] with no known biodegradation mechanism in water. In case of fire it releases highly corrosive and toxic hydrogen fluoride and the highly toxic gas carbonyl fluoride."
"Other additives have been proposed for lowering the flammability of HFO-1234yf, such as trifluoroiodomethane, which has a low GWP due to its short atmospheric lifetime, but is slightly mutagenic.[38]"

But hey, a poison that accumulated in the body and causes cancer is better then some CO2, right? Right?
Gee, uses ELECTRICITY to cool/heat. Battery powered cars use electricity to recharge.
If globalist get their way, your oven, furnace etc will use electricity as well.
Everything will be 100% powered by electricity. At least in the USA, the grid can barely handle
the demand. So, with smart meters and what not, the government will be "forced" to control how
much juice you use. Sorry...you have used too much electricity this money. We are going to shut
off your use. You can either recharge your car, cook food, or heat/cool your home. You pick.
Colorado already started doing this, using smart meters to shut down people's AC during a heatwave. At the same time, propaganda will tell us the grid will ahve "no issue" handling watt slurping EVs.

Electric everything is about control and servitude. The environment is a convenient cover. The same yahoos pushing EVs are reactivating german coal plants and building natural gas plants to replace nuclear. It's not about CO2. It's about control. Always has been.
 
How it performs as a coolant is not necessarily the reason it was developed. There's this thing called the "ozone layer". Look it up and the effects that previous refrigerants had ont it. That was the reason for the "change". But, thanks for proving my point.
I lived it and I didn't prove anything in regards to your point. You might want to do some research on the ozone layer and not rely on what the news told you in the 80s.
 
Electric everything is about control and servitude. The environment is a convenient cover. The same yahoos pushing EVs are reactivating german coal plants and building natural gas plants to replace nuclear. It's not about CO2. It's about control. Always has been.
Do you wear a tinfoil hat at all times to stop the "gumment" from spying on you? Everything is about control, everyone is out to get you, especially the "gumment" and don't even get me started on crisis actors, false flag operations, and the deep state! We have to guzzle oil based fuels instead of moving to anything else for the next million years to stop all the control and servitude... oh wait.
 
Gee, uses ELECTRICITY to cool/heat. Battery powered cars use electricity to recharge.
If globalist get their way, your oven, furnace etc will use electricity as well.
Everything will be 100% powered by electricity. At least in the USA, the grid can barely handle
the demand. So, with smart meters and what not, the government will be "forced" to control how
much juice you use. Sorry...you have used too much electricity this money. We are going to shut
off your use. You can either recharge your car, cook food, or heat/cool your home. You pick.
As soon as I saw the word "globalist" I stopped reading your post. Tsk, tsk, those evil globalists and the deep state are out to get you. Be right back, my favorite character from the Fox News cinematic universe is giving a live speech!
 
Another money grab. All to make certain people "Feel" good about themselves. Accomplishes nothing but makes the cost go up. Exactly what they want. It's about control.

Air Conditioning is environmentally friendly as it gets. Being around me when I'm hot and sweaty is not.
 
Gee, uses ELECTRICITY to cool/heat. Battery powered cars use electricity to recharge.
If globalist get their way, your oven, furnace etc will use electricity as well.
Everything will be 100% powered by electricity. At least in the USA, the grid can barely handle
the demand. So, with smart meters and what not, the government will be "forced" to control how
much juice you use. Sorry...you have used too much electricity this money. We are going to shut
off your use. You can either recharge your car, cook food, or heat/cool your home. You pick.

"the grid can barely handle the demand..." Of course it can't. It's early days. I can just hear your great grandfather in 1915: "We can't have these new fangled automobiles, there's no gas stations in our town."
 
Do you wear a tinfoil hat at all times to stop the "gumment" from spying on you? Everything is about control, everyone is out to get you, especially the "gumment" and don't even get me started on crisis actors, false flag operations, and the deep state! We have to guzzle oil based fuels instead of moving to anything else for the next million years to stop all the control and servitude... oh wait.
The controls for remotely shutting down HVAC have already been used during a heatwave, and eco activists love telling us how doing that will save the environment. But proof is lost on someone who handwaves everything away as a conspiracy theory.

Leaving aside all those pathetic straw-men you came up with, we need nuclear power to make this all electric future tenable. That means we should have started building them by now. And we need dramatically improved copper production. And if we REALLY cared, we'd be chasing low hanging fruit, like ocean vessels burning bunker oil. But no. We chase these small targets that make things worse for your average citizen while flagrantly ignoring those rules for the elite.

Given how poorly the government implements.....well anything really, why would you trust them with this?
 
Right, development started a few years before the patent ran out, and the ozone layer fear mongering began when the patent ran out. The same thing was tried with r134a (ZOMG CO2!!!1!!!!1!!) and the government WAS moving to ban it just like they did with r134a, except for the slightly annoying issue of its replacement, r1234a, being flammable under pressure.....like when an air conditioner fails. OOPS. Oh, and it also decays into a PFCA, a persistent organic pollution.

Reminder: r134a was sold as a "100 year global warming improvement" but now is seen as a "major danger to global warming". Which started in 2012. The same year the patent ran out. Total coincidence I'm sure.

Per Wikipedia: "In the atmosphere, HFO-1234yf degrades to trifluoroacetic acid,[22] which is a mildly phytotoxic[23] strong organic acid[24] with no known biodegradation mechanism in water. In case of fire it releases highly corrosive and toxic hydrogen fluoride and the highly toxic gas carbonyl fluoride."
"Other additives have been proposed for lowering the flammability of HFO-1234yf, such as trifluoroiodomethane, which has a low GWP due to its short atmospheric lifetime, but is slightly mutagenic.[38]"

But hey, a poison that accumulated in the body and causes cancer is better then some CO2, right? Right?

Colorado already started doing this, using smart meters to shut down people's AC during a heatwave. At the same time, propaganda will tell us the grid will ahve "no issue" handling watt slurping EVs.

Electric everything is about control and servitude. The environment is a convenient cover. The same yahoos pushing EVs are reactivating german coal plants and building natural gas plants to replace nuclear. It's not about CO2. It's about control. Always has been.

Yet, somehow you're using it to post BS here. Do you make all your own gas? Are you trying to make the false argument that the government doesn't control gas and gas prices, as well? If so, why do people making the arguments you do tend to blame the current president for it, when he has little to do with it, but only when it's not YOUR person? I just got done hearing someone recently spout BS about how you need a lot of gas to make electricity, so charging cars is more wasteful, whereas you'll actually burn a lot more gas in the lifetime of that car pumping gas into it than you will siphoning off a grid that's already making electricity as it is. For those concerned about the grid's ability to handle it, that's a valid concern, but only if the government does nothing to harden it against such a concern. How do you think you got to the point that the whole world uses electricity if you can't improve it? The main thing that will stand in the way of progress are those trying to push an agenda. You see this already where politicians are trying to hold up progress or cause chaos to get things to line up to their specific agenda, rather than letting a situation stay in place that doesn't.
 
The controls for remotely shutting down HVAC have already been used during a heatwave, and eco activists love telling us how doing that will save the environment. But proof is lost on someone who handwaves everything away as a conspiracy theory.
Name enough real world examples of any of this.
 
Back