Nine PBS lost access to 50TB of archives after its cloud storage provider vanished

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,523   +76
Staff
Facepalm: Entrusting critical systems to external tech companies can be dangerous because a provider might suddenly shut down or stop responding. Nine PBS is currently learning this lesson, along with the importance of maintaining additional backups, after its cloud storage provider apparently went out of business and left more than 50TB of archival data inaccessible.

Nine PBS in St. Louis sued Iron Mountain Data Centers after spending much of this year attempting to regain access to more than 50TB of archival data. The station's cloud storage provider, Open Source Storage (OSS), apparently ceased operating, while infrastructure containing the station's files remained housed at an Iron Mountain data center in Denver.

Correction, story update (August 17): An earlier version of this story incorrectly described Open Source Storage as a data center and stated that Iron Mountain owned OSS. OSS was Nine PBS' cloud storage provider and separately housed infrastructure at an Iron Mountain data center in Denver. Iron Mountain's facility did not shut down or change ownership. The story has been corrected and updated with details from the August 12 court hearing (more about this below).

According to public media outlet Current, the station began entrusting the massive trove of data, which includes 70 years of broadcast history, to a company described in court filings as "OSS predecessor" in 2019. Nine PBS renewed its contract each year, even after its partner changed its name to Open Source Storage, until February 2026, when OSS stopped responding to attempts to discuss another renewal.

Despite the contract's 30-day grace period, OSS abruptly cut off access to the archive on March 6 without offering the station an opportunity to renew. Upon investigation, Nine PBS discovered that OSS was delinquent with the Colorado Secretary of State and its website had shut down. The station later learned that OSS housed the infrastructure containing its data at an Iron Mountain colocation facility in Denver. Iron Mountain did not own or operate OSS.

The runaround became more confusing from there. After demanding that Iron Mountain preserve and return the archive, Nine PBS sued OSS and its purported president, Charles Wells, in the St. Louis Circuit Court on April 16, but paused proceedings after James Tramel, a "managing partner" of an unnamed group that acquired OSS, confirmed that the data was safe.

Even stranger, Nine PBS lost contact with Tramel after about a month and eventually received an automatic email stating that he was no longer connected to OSS. He later claimed that he had been "defrauded" into buying OSS, after which ownership and operations of the cloud storage company reportedly reverted to its previous owners. Nine PBS subsequently resumed its legal action and obtained a ruling confirming that the station owned its data and that OSS should facilitate its transfer to another provider.

Nine PBS then returned to Iron Mountain seeking access to the archive. According to the station's complaint, Iron Mountain initially indicated that it would cooperate before declining to release the material because OSS owned the physical infrastructure housing the data. Nine PBS filed a separate lawsuit against Iron Mountain in Denver in July, seeking to prevent the data from being deleted and to establish a way to retrieve it.

Iron Mountain says its role in the dispute has been limited to providing physical colocation infrastructure, while OSS owned and controlled the servers and other hardware. The company told TechSpot that it never had access to Nine PBS' data and could not grant a third party access to OSS equipment without authorization or a court order.

"Throughout this process, we have been transparent with Nine PBS about our role in this dispute, that we do not have access to their data, and we have made consistent efforts to help them resolve the issue," an Iron Mountain spokesperson told TechSpot. The dispute moved closer to a resolution during an August 12 hearing. Denver District Court Judge Eric Elliff ruled that Nine PBS owns the archival material and ordered Iron Mountain to cooperate with the station in retrieving it.

The court gave Nine PBS 30 days to identify a qualified third party capable of accessing the OSS infrastructure and extracting the station's files without accessing data belonging to other OSS customers. Nine PBS will be responsible for costs associated with the recovery, including applicable storage charges, and must protect Iron Mountain against liability stemming from damage to the equipment or improper access to other customers' data. The parties are expected to report their progress to the court in September.

The ruling effectively provides Nine PBS with a path to recover the archive while recognizing the unusual technical and legal situation: the station owns the data, OSS controls the infrastructure on which it resides, and Iron Mountain operates the facility housing that infrastructure.

While the circumstances behind OSS's disappearance and apparent ownership turmoil remain mysterious, Nine PBS's struggles serve as another reminder of the importance of redundant backups. South Korea's government discovered this late last year after losing 858TB in a data center fire.

Permalink to story:

 
I've got 5TB of movies/shows backed up across 4 different locations.

How any large company doesn't have their own data on site, backed up several times - especially considering for Nine PBS that's only 40TB, that's their own damn fault.

I have no sympathy for anyone or company that does not store and backup their own data and solely rely on cloud.
 
This why it is important not to rely solely on a third party Datacenter. We have both in house backups and offsite backups of anything critical. The cloud vendor "Amazon" is for quick access to data, if Amazon goes down it won't affect business as we have offline access to the data (just make take longer to access it).
 
The cloud shouldn't be your only workspace. We've been crying this for years and nobody listens until everything goes belly up.

To be honest, we all do that to some degree. It doesn't have to be the subject at hand that were talking about now. How many times have we heard from others or told others to check out that stomach, headache (or other health related issues) problem and they or we never do it till something horrible happens, like cancer gets discovered or a perforation forms within the stomach because the person didn't listen. Or how about that plumbing, roof, AC unit etc that needed fixing that someone told you about that we should have done but now we have a major leak problem causing mold now, or better yet, a lot of people have been complaining about how criminals are always let go free up to 15-20 times only for them to come back and do another heinous crime. I guess you know what I'm getting at, I could keep going on and on but you get the point lol, the fact of the matter is all of us have done this at one point or another when it comes to ignoring other peoples advice due to whatever reason.
 
Any time you back up "your data" to SOMEONE ELSE'S SERVER, you get what you get. Backup your data on your "own server". (NASync DXP2800 G, as an example) PBS has the money to backup their own data. They own this.
 
50TB isn't much data at all, especially for a large company. Even as a drone hobbyist, I have over 100TB of video data sitting on a server in a closet in my home, and I have all of it backed up with BackBlaze for just $99/year.
You're assuming PBS management has the expertise to know how to do this (think Hillary Clinton emails). They're not dumb, this just isn't what they specialize in, obviously. This is where regulation needs to enter: to protect people so they don't have to be good at this stuff; they can safely and confidently hire a third party, and they don't have to go to court to reclaim their own stuff. There's a standard mechanism for this scenario. I'm tired of these mechanisms being written in the most expensive place possible - court. Only lawyers benefit. Please bring back independent regulatory agencies!!!! Unlike Congress -- which writes almost no laws at all anymore- they actually wrote fairly bipartisan rules on a regular basis, and the poor consumer didn't have to worry about this ****.
 
You're assuming PBS management has the expertise to know how to do this (think Hillary Clinton emails). They're not dumb, this just isn't what they specialize in, obviously. This is where regulation needs to enter: to protect people so they don't have to be good at this stuff; they can safely and confidently hire a third party, and they don't have to go to court to reclaim their own stuff. There's a standard mechanism for this scenario. I'm tired of these mechanisms being written in the most expensive place possible - court. Only lawyers benefit. Please bring back independent regulatory agencies!!!! Unlike Congress -- which writes almost no laws at all anymore- they actually wrote fairly bipartisan rules on a regular basis, and the poor consumer didn't have to worry about this ****.

It is trivial to have an onsite backup of 50TB of digital video when all you do is digital video broadcasts, production, and editing. The cloud backup doesn't even necessarily need to be properly organized, but local video must be properly categorized for easy reference and retrieval.

Somewhere in their process they made an incompetent choice about their digital archives.

 
Back