Over 230 environmental groups across the US are asking Congress to halt AI data-center expansion

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,511   +934
Staff
Something to look forward to: Big Tech and AI companies are planning to build massive new data centers over the next few years, driven by the belief that AI will transform – or even replace – many jobs and industries. However, a significant portion of the communities affected by these projects are pushing back so strongly that they might actually succeed in halting them.

A large coalition of environmentally-focused organizations has sent a scathing letter to members of Congress, urging US representatives to put the development of new data centers on hold. The letter identifies generative AI and cryptocurrency as among the most significant environmental and social threats of this generation, citing their role in fueling an unregulated expansion of data centers across the country.

According to the letter, this unprecedented growth is driving a rapid increase in energy demand, accelerating fossil fuel depletion, polluting the environment, and overconsuming water resources. Electricity prices are soaring, and the expansion of AI infrastructure raises additional concerns about societal impacts, including job losses, economic monopolies, and broader instability.

The letter details the "massive" harms new AI data centers are inflicting on the US, highlighting their "enormous" energy consumption. Data center capacity is expected to triple over the next five years, with the new facilities consuming as much electricity as roughly 30 million households. Consequently, electricity bills have already increased by 21.3 percent from 2021 to 2024, outpacing inflation.

The rapid growth of AI data centers is also projected to strain water resources. New facilities may require as much water as 18.5 million households, primarily for cooling servers used to train large language models and generate AI outputs.

The letter states that data center plans fueling the AI and crypto "frenzy" are disrupting a growing number of communities across the US, threatening Americans' economy, environment, and water security. Representing the collective interests of millions of people across all 50 states, the document urges Congress to impose a federal moratorium on new data centers until "adequate" regulations are implemented.

Currently, Big Tech and AI companies are acting as if they operate in a lawless wasteland where scarce natural resources are up for grabs. The IT industry plans to spend a staggering $8 trillion to build new data-crunching server plants, while some proposals even suggest orbiting data centers in space – an environmentally questionable, sci-fi-esque idea.

According to Emily Wurth, managing director of Food & Water Watch, the organization behind the letter, there is now bipartisan support for significant pushback against new data centers.

"A lot of people don't see the benefits coming from AI and feel they will be paying for it with their energy bills and water," Wurth said.

Recent research from Data Center Watch shows that $64 billion worth of data center projects have already been blocked or delayed due to opposition from local communities. Citizens across the political spectrum are pushing back against the rapid expansion, as more and more Americans struggle to pay their electricity bills.

Permalink to story:

 
I agree that it would be "too much" if AI companies, in addition to buying up all the RAM, also consumed and all the electricity. :)

trUbOek.jpeg
 
LOL, the "green" types have been causing issues since the 70's with the smog. Not that I was "pro" air pollution, but it's funny how in the 70's, "experts" were telling us we were headed to a new global ice age. In the 90's, it was "man made" global warming. The "Bill Gates" types are now wanting to spray the upper atmosphere with something to block out some sunlight to reduce the temperatures.
Fracking, oil drilling, mining coal, mining rare Earth materials, water dams for hydroelectric power...if it was up to them, we'd all still be living in caves.
 
LOL, the "green" types have been causing issues since the 70's with the smog. Not that I was "pro" air pollution, but it's funny how in the 70's, "experts" were telling us we were headed to a new global ice age. In the 90's, it was "man made" global warming. The "Bill Gates" types are now wanting to spray the upper atmosphere with something to block out some sunlight to reduce the temperatures.
Fracking, oil drilling, mining coal, mining rare Earth materials, water dams for hydroelectric power...if it was up to them, we'd all still be living in caves.


Such a novel reply, that's never been used before. Well done.
 
A lot of this tension comes from the gap between who benefits and who pays. The economic upside of AI is mostly captured by tech giants and investors, but the externalities — higher energy demand, increased water usage, local noise, land use changes — fall on towns that may not get much value back. Without clearer regulation or shared benefits, pushback feels inevitable.
 
What's that old saying? Money talks, BS walks? Yeah, you can protest, boycott, write angry letters and sign petitions until you turn blue in the face. None of that matters. All these corporations think they found a golden goose in AI and they're going to force feed it as much money as possible so that it lays more golden eggs.

I can't wait to see how things go when the AI bubble pops, and it WILL pop despite what all the "smart" poster on this site will have you believe. All the signs are there, but people are blinded by the color green.

They're literally pumping not millions or billions, but TRILLIONS into this AI nonsense. Can someone explain to me how anyone is going to turn a profit with these insane amounts being spent?

I have never paid for AI anything and I never will in the future, no matter how advanced it gets. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who feel the same. I mean, everyone is basically getting a taste of AI for free even if you don't want it. Even on Google the first match for a search is an AI response.

Who exactly is going to start paying for something they're getting for free right now? Reminds me of the days when some internet companies tried to charge people for e-mail access after everyone was already used to getting it for free. How did that turn out?
 
Most, if not all of these groups are financed by China.
Probably a fair amount have only one or two members.

Some of the so-called "environmentalists" are starry-eyed lunatics who really believe they are doing something good, but the majority of them are perfectly aware they are paid by our enemies to work against their own country.
 
What's that old saying? Money talks, BS walks? Yeah, you can protest, boycott, write angry letters and sign petitions until you turn blue in the face. None of that matters. All these corporations think they found a golden goose in AI and they're going to force feed it as much money as possible so that it lays more golden eggs.

I can't wait to see how things go when the AI bubble pops, and it WILL pop despite what all the "smart" poster on this site will have you believe. All the signs are there, but people are blinded by the color green.

They're literally pumping not millions or billions, but TRILLIONS into this AI nonsense. Can someone explain to me how anyone is going to turn a profit with these insane amounts being spent?

I have never paid for AI anything and I never will in the future, no matter how advanced it gets. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who feel the same. I mean, everyone is basically getting a taste of AI for free even if you don't want it. Even on Google the first match for a search is an AI response.

Who exactly is going to start paying for something they're getting for free right now? Reminds me of the days when some internet companies tried to charge people for e-mail access after everyone was already used to getting it for free. How did that turn out?

"Who exactly is going to start paying for something they're getting for free right now?"

Someone who does serious work, day-by-day and AI has cut down taks that would take weeks to hours. I.e. companies. I pay and will pay and will also pay more the more advanced it gets. AI is as good as the "context" and info you feed it. As far as I am concerned it is now an indsipensable part of our workflow.
 
Back