PC shipments are falling, but manufacturers are making more money selling pricier AI PCs

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,168   +62
Staff
Bottom line: PC makers are selling more expensive machines into a market with fewer available units, as tight memory supplies reshape product mix, pricing, and demand for AI-capable systems. That shift is helping manufacturers preserve – and in some cases expand – revenue even as global shipments decline, but it is also pushing the industry further away from the low-cost devices that once drove volume growth.

The pressure is originating in the AI infrastructure market, where demand for memory chips has driven up component costs and limited supply for other hardware categories.

The near-term winners are likely to be vendors with strong commercial exposure and premium AI offerings, while consumers and budget-conscious buyers face higher prices with little prospect of quick relief.

PC vendors have responded by concentrating production on higher-priced devices, particularly systems designed to run AI workloads locally. The strategy is reducing shipment volumes but, so far, generating higher revenue.

International Data Corporation reported that worldwide PC shipments fell 4.9% in the second quarter. The research firm expects average PC prices to rise 20% this year, followed by more modest increases in 2027, even as unit shipments continue to decline.

For manufacturers, pricing has become the mechanism for protecting revenue as fewer systems reach the market. "They have to offset the decrease in shipments with higher pricing to maintain revenue or grow revenue," IDC Director of Consumer Research Jitesh Ubrani told The Wall Street Journal.

The results are already visible in quarterly earnings. HP said its personal systems segment, which includes its PC business, increased revenue 18% in the second quarter even as unit sales fell 16%. Dell's client solutions group posted a 20% revenue increase in its most recent quarter, while Lenovo reported nearly 30% revenue growth in PCs and smart devices.

That performance reflects a deliberate shift away from entry-level machines. With memory both expensive and scarce, vendors are allocating more components to premium systems, where higher selling prices can better absorb cost inflation and protect margins.

AI PCs are central to that shift. The term generally refers to systems equipped to handle certain AI processing on the device rather than relying entirely on cloud infrastructure. Such machines typically combine newer CPUs, GPUs, or dedicated neural-processing units with larger memory configurations – features that can increase both component requirements and retail prices.

Manufacturers are positioning those capabilities as a reason for businesses and consumers to accept higher prices. HP Chief Financial Officer Karen Parkhill said the company has increased the share of AI PCs in its shipments and expects the category to expand further. "We're proud to have an increased penetration of AI PCs today as part of our shipments," she told analysts, adding that the segment will be "a growing part as we look ahead."

Commercial customers may provide the strongest support for the market. UBS analyst David Vogt said business demand accounts for roughly 75% of PC market volume and should be relatively resilient, particularly as enterprises evaluate on-premises AI systems for sensitive or complicated workloads. That is especially relevant in regulated industries, where organizations may want tighter control over data and AI processing.

Still, the market faces limits. PCs must compete with servers, networking equipment, cloud services, and other priorities within enterprise technology budgets. Vogt also said some recent commercial demand may represent orders brought forward to avoid expected price increases rather than a sustained increase in purchasing.

Consumer demand could be more difficult to maintain. Shoppers may be less inclined than businesses to pay a significant premium for AI features, particularly if the practical benefits are unclear or software support remains uneven. Vogt pointed to HP's below-seasonal outlook for the current quarter as an early sign of that challenge. "That's a struggle that HP and Dell and Lenovo are going to have to grapple with," he said.

The underlying memory shortage is unlikely to provide relief soon. Ubrani does not expect supply conditions to improve before at least 2028. IDC's forecasts indicate that prices could begin to decline after that point, though they are not expected to return to 2025 levels.

For now, the PC industry's recovery is less about shipping more computers than selling a more lucrative mix of them. That model has helped vendors report stronger revenue despite falling volumes, but it also leaves buyers facing a market where waiting for a cheaper laptop may not deliver much near-term benefit.

Permalink to story:

 
For manufacturers, pricing has become the mechanism for protecting revenue as fewer systems reach the market.

In other words, if someone is still dumb or unfortunate enough to buy right now, they'll pay a corporate survivial tax for no additional value.
 
In other words, if someone is still dumb or unfortunate enough to buy right now, they'll pay a corporate survivial tax for no additional value.
It's called supply and demand.

People who work for a living are too busy to complain endlessly about PCs costing $500 more, they buy, adjust the price for their customers, and move on.
 
It's called supply and demand.

People who work for a living are too busy to complain endlessly about PCs costing $500 more, they buy, adjust the price for their customers, and move on.
Very true.

Still, I did choke a little when I was pricing out a new Surface Pro (business ed) for myself and a maxed out one now costs $5K instead of the $3K I paid for the last one.
(To be fair, maxed out is now 64GB RAM and it used to be 32GB).
 
Last edited:
Very true.

Still, I did choke a little when I was pricing out a new Surface Pro (business ed) for myself and a maxed out one now costs $5K instead of the $3K I paid for the last one.
(To be fair, maxed out is now 64GB RAM and it used to be 32GB).
Oh yeah, the prices are not fun at all, everyone groans when the bills come in. I'm just getting fatigued at the constant cynicism at pricing, implying that anyone who buys now is dumb or a shill, as if business needs to stand still for years and can do so with no reprecussions.
 
It's called supply and demand.

People who work for a living are too busy to complain endlessly about PCs costing $500 more, they buy, adjust the price for their customers, and move on.

Uh huh. Wake me up when they actually create additional value and have a compelling deal on offer. I don't work to stay busy, I work to make money and I care about market sob stories as much as their owners care about me. They'll be fine without my charity.
 
All that is perfectly normal.
Lots of people were accustomed to replacing tech at regular intervals for no actual reason.
Companies are far worse - many have (or had) rules demanding company mobile phones and laptops replacement every 3-4 years for no reason. A 10-year old laptop and a 5-year old phone are still perfectly good for the vast majority of users.
What we see is a return to common sense in the face of the temporary new realities, there is no drama.
 
Uh huh. Wake me up when they actually create additional value and have a compelling deal on offer. I don't work to stay busy, I work to make money and I care about market sob stories as much as their owners care about me. They'll be fine without my charity.
And they will be fine without yours. Companies are not going to take a loss because you want to pay 2023 prices for 2026 hardware. When you need a PC that works, there's your value.
All that is perfectly normal.
Lots of people were accustomed to replacing tech at regular intervals for no actual reason.
Companies are far worse - many have (or had) rules demanding company mobile phones and laptops replacement every 3-4 years for no reason. A 10-year old laptop and a 5-year old phone are still perfectly good for the vast majority of users.
What we see is a return to common sense in the face of the temporary new realities, there is no drama.
It depends on how the company handles IT. Around 3-4 years is when batteries start failing and hinges start breaking, keyboards start failing, ece. Can you keep the hardware around longer? Easily. But you have to weigh the downtime and cost of maintaining a service department or having to pay contractors, and they do not come cheap (and most have no idea what they are doing either). Eventually the rate of repairs begins costing you more in downtime then you are saving on hardware replacement costs.

SSDs have extended that, but even with an SSD and 16GB of RAM, our 10 year old Dell Latitude 5480s are painfully slow compared to the new ones. Those old dual core i7s dont cope well with windows 11, antivirus, corporate management software, and productivity software all running at the same time.

Phones its a similar problem. We keep hardware on rotation because repairing or upgrading devices en masse takes significant time and resources. Even now, if the PC costs $2k, that's $500 a year on a 4 year rotation. How much is 2-4 hours of downtime going to cost you if the system fails in year 5? If its over $500, you have now lost money. Also, once you hit year 4 you are out of warranty and paying for the parts yourself.
 
Back