Petition demands Samsung stops using Exynos processors in its phones

midian182

Posts: 6,786   +61
Staff member

The petition, which has been signed by over 21,000 people, states: “Phones with Exynos SoC chips [sic] are shown to perform slower, have less battery life, use inferior camera sensors and processing, overheat and throttle faster, amongst other issues.”

The petition does have a point. Notebookcheck writes that the Exynos 990 found in the Galaxy S20 phones delivers a peak performance to power ratio of 13.0/W, whereas the Snapdragon 865 from the US version of the handsets comes in at 19.6/W. Even last year’s Snapdragon 855 beats the current Exynos 990, boasting a ratio of around 15/W.

Other benchmarks show the Snapdragon performing better than the Exynos. Samsung’s chip lags behind in AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, and AITUTU tests, though it did beat Qualcomm’s SoC in PCMark. We should also note, this is not a new development. When we reviewed the Galaxy S9+ back in 2018, the duality of SoC equipment was there and we called it "an Exynos fail."

Image credit: Beebom

The petition also notes that Samsung uses its own-brand camera sensors, but it uses parts from Sony in the US versions.

If the company won’t use Snapdragon chips in all its phones, the petition calls for transparency about the differences between the two SoCs, or that it prices the Exynos version of the handsets lower than the Snapdragon alternatives.

Will Samsung listen to the petition’s demands? It’s highly unlikely, especially as its Exynos chipset division has surpassed Apple as the third-largest supplier in the smartphone industry.

Image credit: DANIEL CONSTANTE via Shutterstock

Permalink to story.

 

Ludak021

Posts: 443   +304
They haven't mentioned how fast Exynos overheats and drops to Galaxy 6 performance levels? Strange. (I could link a video but I don't know if I am allowed to)
 

Uncle Al

Posts: 8,014   +6,783
It's all about the money ... they get a better $ deal with one chip, that's the way they will go .... no big secret here.
 

Azurelas

Posts: 15   +12
Petition? For what? You vote with your wallet. How about buy a different product? It's not rocket surgery guys.
Problem is that the non-Exynos isn't available in my part of the world (Western Europe). Samsung, in their infinite wisdom, have made the Snapdragon phones non-compatible with European GSM standards. So basically we're screwed.
 

Fearghast

Posts: 351   +250
I didn't buy Note 9 for this reason, so Yeah I did sign this petition (my older phone with Snapdragon 835 was faster).
It probably won't change a thing, but at least I feel like I tried "something" to make it better for us in EU.
 

poohbear

Posts: 630   +548
Why not buy an unlocked snapdragon version on Ebay? might be a little pricier, but you get the model with the CPU u want. :)
 

yRaz

Posts: 3,674   +3,668
Problem is that the non-Exynos isn't available in my part of the world (Western Europe). Samsung, in their infinite wisdom, have made the Snapdragon phones non-compatible with European GSM standards. So basically we're screwed.
Why don't you buy a non-samsung phone with the specs you want?
 

pmshah

Posts: 160   +28
It's all about the money ... they get a better $ deal with one chip, that's the way they will go .... no big secret here.
Of course it is. Exynos is their own inhouse designed processor. Why pay exhorbitant price for Snapdragon ? From what I have read recently even LG and and Google Pixel are not planning on getting the "latest and the best" 5G snapdragon device.
 

Mr Majestyk

Posts: 731   +620
Problem is that the non-Exynos isn't available in my part of the world (Western Europe). Samsung, in their infinite wisdom, have made the Snapdragon phones non-compatible with European GSM standards. So basically we're screwed.

Same in Australia, only crapnyos is offered and so Samesung has lost me as a customer. Still using my S7 Edge which looks like I'll be keeping for a long time. 5G is of no use to me at all and I'm not spending hundreds more on a useless feature.
 

Red999

Posts: 100   +37
The custom m core is the culprit. But we don't need to worry as samsung has closed the development team. Let's wait for s21
 

veLa

Posts: 1,096   +703
So are the Exynos chips noticeably slower than the Snapdragon chips during daily use, or does it only become measurable when benchmarking the device?

It's also important to note that Samsung likes using the Exynos chips because it's an in-house design. I remember in 2012 when the Galaxy S2 was the top dog that the model Exynos chip was actually the faster of the two available handsets, but lacked LTE.
 

Evernessince

Posts: 5,464   +6,148
So are the Exynos chips noticeably slower than the Snapdragon chips during daily use, or does it only become measurable when benchmarking the device?

It's also important to note that Samsung likes using the Exynos chips because it's an in-house design. I remember in 2012 when the Galaxy S2 was the top dog that the model Exynos chip was actually the faster of the two available handsets, but lacked LTE.

100% benchmarking. Even low end smartphones nowadays run smooth for daily use.
 
Just don't sign this petition !!! What are those pp think ? Did you see Huawei example ? Do you want supremacy of Snapdragon over everything ? And when Trump or another fat *** president wanabe just want to tarif Korean because they are too strong then Samsung (or LG or other brands) will be killed ? Wake up pp, don't be sheep !
 

quadibloc

Posts: 281   +170
Samsung should stop using Exynos chips in some countries for phones given the same model designation, and sold at the same price, as phones sold using Qualcomm chips in other countries. That I agree with. But if they used Snapdragon chips from Qualcomm in some high-end models, and their own Exynos chips in lower-priced models, reflecting the difference in performance, I would have no problem with that.