YouTuber says he will sue Samsung for dodging 990 Pro SSD warranty replacement amid memory crisis

midian182

Posts: 11,718   +177
Staff member
WTF?! Louis Rossmann, the consumer-rights activist, independent technician, and owner of a very popular YouTube channel, says he will take Samsung to court over a broken 990 Pro SSD. He claims the company isn't honoring its warranty policy because the memory crisis has pushed the price up so much since the drive was purchased, making a replacement far more expensive than the original sale.

Update (June 16): Samsung contacted TechSpot to clarify that, in cases where a warranty replacement is unavailable, customers receive a refund based on the device's current market value, determined by its current sale price on Samsung.com. The company said this policy applies across its product portfolio and is communicated to customers once the refund process begins. Samsung added that it had communicated the same clarification to Rossmann, though he does not appear to have publicly confirmed receiving a revised refund offer as of publication.

Rossmann says he bought the Samsung 990 Pro 4TB from Best Buy less than two years ago for around $330. The drive was being used with a heatsink and two 80mm fans above it, and was part of a RAID 1 array.

According to Samsung's own warranty page, the 990 Pro 4TB is covered for five years or 2,400 TB written, whichever comes first. Rossmann says his drive failed well inside that period, repeatedly dropping out of the array and eventually becoming unusable.

The first response from Samsung Canada's business-to-business support desk appeared to agree with his diagnosis. The company said that when a drive remains visible to the operating system but stops responding to NVMe admin commands or SMART tools, it indicates a fatal controller or firmware-level lockup and requires a warranty replacement.

After being redirected to Samsung's US memory support team, Rossmann says he sent in the requested information, logs, receipt, and photos (eventually) before shipping the SSD to the company. Samsung later returned the drive with a repair statement saying it had passed testing and was "verified as good."

Rossmann says the returned SSD was anything but. In the video, he connects it to PC-3000 Express hardware used in his data recovery business and shows write speeds collapsing to around 40MB/s to 60MB/s before the drive stops behaving normally again.

Samsung later told him that the service center had reset the controller, reflashed the firmware, and completed a stress test that should replicate normal read and write operations in a standard consumer environment.

The company said it could reopen the warranty ticket, but added that because of a "very big shortage of memory products," it did not have his model or a comparable SSD available for replacement, apparently. So, a refund would be started instead.

The memory crisis has made warranty claims a lot less straightforward for consumers. A refund based on the original purchase price would not cover the cost of an equivalent drive today. He pointed out that the same 4TB 990 Pro is now selling for around $950, almost three times what he paid.

Rossmann says he has given Samsung 60 days' notice to provide a new or equivalent working 4TB 990 Pro. If not, he plans to file suit in Travis County, Texas.

A pinned comment under Rossmann's video notes that Samsung's own SSD warranty terms appear to address this exact situation. If the company cannot repair or replace a defective SSD, the policy says it can refund the "then current market value" of the product at the time the warranty claim is made. That clause likely works in Samsung's favor when products depreciate, but in this case, it could mean paying far more than Rossmann originally spent.

Permalink to story:

 
Louis Rossman uses a lot of "French" when talking about Samsung intentionally ducking their responsibility to honor the original warranty. He's giving them 90 days, then will file in small claims court. Lou doesn't need a lawyer for this process. Samsung will. My bet is that Samsung gives in and spends a couple of bucks of their tens of billions in profit to settle the matter.

It's popcorn time. 🍿
 
I don't know If He has any chances, that's a standard practice worldwide to leave You hanging. During last crypto boom My RTX2006 burnt down And I got to pocket-out extra $100 to buy 6650XT. On the bright side, I got extra 2GB of VRAM and generally some double-digit performance boost, so in the end came out square.
But right now, with RAM and memory going up x times, I would just wait.
 
Korean here, I don't know the entire story, but if Samsung tried to get one over on him when it comes to the warranty he deserves, than I hope justice will be served. But just like someone had already said, I don't think it'll come to that. Samsung knows they'll be spending more money to get a lawyer then to honor the warranty. In addition, user556 said it best. Chances are someone else probably went through this also, its never just one. When people stand up to big corporations like this, they are also standing up for the victims that had already fallen victim to them. Samsung isn't dealing with the average user, Louis Rossman is CLEARLY an expert in his field (the man even repairs PCBs down to the component level) and it amazes me how Samsung thinks they can get one over on him. If this thing does go to court, Louis has a very good chance in winning.
 
Last edited:
I wonder just how many people have been screwed over by Samsung denying a replacement for a defective product, most people don't have the money to be fighting massive companies.
But I think it's likely that Samsung will give Louis a new SSD to avoid the cost of court fees and lawyers. Although I don't expect Samsung to change their attitude towards consumers since honoring the warranty means less they can sell to AI companies.
 
Samsung created both the SSD and the "memory crisis" it is impacted by. Go ahead and cut production again Samsung so you can raise prices.
 
I wonder just how many people have been screwed over by Samsung denying a replacement for a defective product, most people don't have the money to be fighting massive companies.
But I think it's likely that Samsung will give Louis a new SSD to avoid the cost of court fees and lawyers. Although I don't expect Samsung to change their attitude towards consumers since honoring the warranty means less they can sell to AI companies.
They'll probably just no-show to court and he'll be awarded the original value of the product. That's cheaper than hiring lawyers.
 
They'll probably just no-show to court and he'll be awarded the original value of the product. That's cheaper than hiring lawyers.
Their own warranty terms specify current pricing, not original. I don't know what Samsung will do but I have the popcorn ready.
 
Their own warranty terms specify current pricing, not original. I don't know what Samsung will do but I have the popcorn ready.
Well in the video he showed the letter where they offered him a refund of the original purchase price.
 
Corporate like Samsung will always look at the situation. if it's not worth their time they'll just pay Louis for the replacement. Most time people won't go through the hassle of lawsuits like Louis as it costs money and time especially if the company is headquartered in another Country. So Samsung will just keep doing what they do.
 
I don't know If He has any chances, that's a standard practice worldwide to leave You hanging. During last crypto boom My RTX2006 burnt down And I got to pocket-out extra $100 to buy 6650XT. On the bright side, I got extra 2GB of VRAM and generally some double-digit performance boost, so in the end came out square.
But right now, with RAM and memory going up x times, I would just wait.
Why should people wait when the company has a responsibility to fulfill their warranty practices. it's not the consumer's fault memory cost went up because Samsung themselves are selling it to other A.I data centers.
 
Small claims court is inexpensive and you can't have a lawyer represent you in one just FYI.

If more people went to small claims court these modern practices of companies wouldn't be profitable.
 
Samsung created both the SSD and the "memory crisis" it is impacted by. Go ahead and cut production again Samsung so you can raise prices.
I'm honestly unsure why some of you people prefer to live in a fantasy world rather than reality. Samsung -- along with every other memory maker in the world -- has drastically increased production and continues to do so as rapidly as possible. By mid-2027, total DRAM production is expected to hit 600% of 2025 levels.
 
There really isn't much to see here. Samsung, like many large companies, often starts with the lowest cost resolution they think a customer might accept. That's not unique to Samsung...it's a common corporate tactic. Many people take the initial offer simply because they want the issue resolved and don't want the hassle of a prolonged dispute.

My guess is that Samsung will either replace the SSD outright or come to some kind of settlement that minimizes the time, cost, and aggravation for both sides.

As for Rossmann, making videos about consumer disputes is part of what he does, and that's fine. But making a video and dropping F bombs every other sentence doesn't automatically mean you're right or guarantee you'll get the outcome you want. Ultimately, the facts and the warranty terms are what matter, not who can generate the most outrage online.

If this somehow did end up in court, judges tend to care about facts, evidence, and contract terms....not internet personalities or YouTube reputations. In some cases, cultivating an image built around confrontation and outrage can be just as much of a liability as an asset.
 
Back