Samsung unveils the Odyssey G75F: a 37-inch 4K VA monitor for around $1,000

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
What just happened? There are so many similarly specced monitors these days that we rarely see "world firsts" anymore. However, Samsung is claiming that title with yet another new Odyssey, which it says is the first-ever 37-inch 4K display.

The Odyssey G7 G75F joins Samsung's increasingly long list of Odyssey monitors, but it's the first monitor ever to combine a 37-inch panel with a 4K (3840x2160) resolution, according to the company.

It's rare to see a 37-inch monitor – 32 inches tends to be the most popular size at 4K, while those demanding something bigger usually opt for 42 inches or larger. One could argue that this size offers something bigger than standard without being overbearingly large on a desk.

While OLED is becoming more common for high-end monitors, the G75F sticks with a VA panel. It has a 165Hz refresh rate, comes with a 3,000:1 contrast ratio, 1ms response time, and supports DisplayHDR 600 and HDR10+ Gaming – though the typical brightness is 350 nits, which is on the low end for HDR content.

The G75F is a curved display. It has an aggressive 1,000R curve, which might not be to everyone's taste.

Elsewhere, the monitor offers 99% sRGB and 90% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage, along with support for 1.07 billion colors.

Port-wise, there are two HDMI 2.1 inputs, a single DisplayPort 1.4, and some USB-A ports. It's surprising to see a modern high-end monitor lacking USB-C, and there's no DisplayPort 2.1, either – though the only Samsung Odyssey monitor that includes DP 2.1 right now is the 57-inch Odyssey Neo G9.

Other features mentioned on Samsung's product page include AMD FreeSync Premium Pro certification, Auto Source Switch+ (for automatically switching to a new source disngal when a device is detected), and CoreSync & CoreLighting+ RGB.

The Odyssey G75F is listed for 4,399 RM on Samsung's website. That's equivalent to just over $1,000.

It feels like Samsung is being optimistic with the pricing here, and leaning a lot on the fact that the G75F measures 37 inches. OLED is becoming an expectation for monitors around the $1,000 mark, as illustrated by all of our top 32-inch 4K OLED picks in the latest Best Gaming Monitors feature. And if you do want a bigger screen, you can find older-generation OLED TVs (some with high refresh rates) that are 42 inches or larger for under $1,000.

Permalink to story:

 
This is for no one. Only 165Hz, an obscene curve, and more expensive than a nice OLED or mini LED TV @ 42".
 
I bought an Odyssey G8 OLED 32" (240Hz in Game mode) last week. It was expensive. Now this one appeared... but it is too big for working comfortably, and it is not OLED.
 
The perfect size for a 4K I think and 32" is too small and 42" is too big. This is just right... refresh rate is okay but that is too much curve I think.
 
I'm waiting for my personal sweet spot...

I used to use a 40" 16:9 3840x2160 VA Flat 60Hz Philips panel... (BDM4065UC)
I currently have a 44.5" 32.9 5120x1440 VA panel with 1800R curve & 144Hz VRR. (QSM)

It's personally awesome to game on, HOWEVER... I sit in a modern slimline leather recliner at my desk and thus when relined, I'm technically further back from the screen than sitting up in a regular office chair.
The width is perfect, the curve is perfect, but the height is NOT perfect. I also do not like watching so much media with the standard movie aspect ratio (close to 21:9?) leaving large black areas to the left and right side of the screen, effectively giving me a much smaller monitor experience.

Using DisplayWars website (https://www.displaywars.com/45-inch-32x9-vs-45-inch-21x9), I've determined I really want a 45" 21:9 monitor to maximise my personal experience.
So I've looked closely at the only option really available... The lg ultragear 45gs95qe-b 44.5 240hz uwqhd oled curved gaming monitor. This is ALMOST perfect for me... that aggressive curve of 800R will be a bit of a problem when reclined back, AND the price is still a bit steep for me...

So I'm waiting for someone to come out with a competitor to the LG but with a less aggressive curve to it (and hopefully cheaper)
 
Back