Seagate developing dual-layer, heat-assisted magnetic recording tech for 120TB HDDs

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,026   +302
Staff
Forward-looking: Magnetic storage technology in hard disks has undergone significant evolution in recent years. Following Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (PMR), Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR), and Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR), the next advancement seems to involve multi-layered HAMR media to vertically stack the bits that make up our valuable digital data.

Seagate recently introduced its Mozaic 3+ storage platform, which implements HAMR technology for 30TB hard disk drives. The US storage giant is now collaborating with Sony to develop new HAMR write heads to meet the ever-growing storage needs of the technology industry. In the near future, Seagate may need to explore uncharted territories such as dual-layer magnetic media for its HAMR products.

Researchers from Seagate, NIMS, and Tohoku University recently published a study in Acta Materialia, proposing a novel approach to HAMR storage that could work within a multi-layered configuration. By recording bits on multiple layers within the same magnetic media, a next-generation HAMR head could achieve unprecedented areal densities, potentially providing 60TB or even 120TB of storage space in a single HDD.

The study underscores the significant growth in big data due to the digital transformation from Industry 4.0 to 5.0, leading to increased demand for digital data storage. HDDs continue to play a major role in the industry as primary storage devices in data centers. With the rise of large-language models, AI chatbots, and data-crunching ML algorithms, the demand for storage is expected to surge in the coming years.

Multi-level recording is not a new concept in the storage industry. Optical disks, such as Blu-ray and UltraHD Blu-ray, can now incorporate two, three, or even four layers to accommodate large amounts of data on a single disk. Similarly, NAND flash memory cells in solid-state drives (SSDs) can store more than one bit in the same vertical space. While multi-layered magnetic media has been proposed in the past, practical products have yet to emerge in the consumer market.

The solution proposed by the new study involves two FePt-C nanogranular films separated by a Ru-C "breaking" layer with a cubic crystal structure. By adjusting the magnetic fields and temperature levels applied by the HAMR heads, the two FePt-C PMR films can reliably store different bits in the same vertical space.

The researchers tested their idea using magnetic measurements and heat-assisted magnetic recording simulations, demonstrating that dual-layer storage media could function effectively within an HDD package. Furthermore, the multi-layered media could enable 3-level or even 4-level magnetic recording on the same platter.

Permalink to story:

 
+1 on that, how reliable can this technology be ? what is the failure rate for "normal" HAMR drives today ? multi-layer didn't go so well for optical
 
Going to end in tears when these inevitably fail. Let's see the backup strategy for 120TB.

People have been saying this for 30 years. "A 100MB hard drive? Are you crazy, do you know how many floppy disks that would take to back up?" 10GB hard drives are released..."Oh no, that's too much data to lose! How will anyone be able to back up 10GB?" The backup strategy is you buy a second 120TB hard drive or whatever size you need for your data, or use cloud backup services.
 
People have been saying this for 30 years. "A 100MB hard drive? Are you crazy, do you know how many floppy disks that would take to back up?" 10GB hard drives are released..."Oh no, that's too much data to lose! How will anyone be able to back up 10GB?" The backup strategy is you buy a second 120TB hard drive or whatever size you need for your data, or use cloud backup services.

How dare you use logic and reason to counter pointless whinge.
 
+1 on that, how reliable can this technology be ? what is the failure rate for "normal" HAMR drives today ? multi-layer didn't go so well for optical
How did multilayer optical not go well? It is a standard that has worked incredibly well for many years. You think those Blu-ray discs people drop in the players are single later??
 
Seagate also said in 2018 that we have 50TB by 2023.
Last year we had only 24TB.

Currently the rate of addition storage increase is 2TB per year. In order to reach even 60TB in ten years the rate should be 4TB each year. So 60TB in ten years I could believe but no, we will not have 120TB HDD's in 2034.
 
How did multilayer optical not go well?
more layers more damage, because one scratch or dust particle damage 3 sectors instead of 1 :(

hard drive is sealed so this specific problem don't apply, but thare could be other problems, like in every new technology...
 
Back