Sugar-fueled flow battery could transform renewable energy storage

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
In brief: Researchers have created a new flow battery that uses sugar to boost the capacity and longevity of energy storage. This design could be used to store grid-scale energy for more than a year, which might expedite the transition to renewable energy.

The discovery comes from the US Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, which published a paper titled 'Proton-regulated alcohol oxidation for high-capacity ketone-based flow battery anolyte' in the scientific journal Joule. The study used a dissolved simple sugar called β-cyclodextrin, a derivative of starch, to enhance battery longevity and capacity.

The experiments optimized the ratio of chemicals in the battery system, achieving 60% more peak power than current methods. The battery was then recycled repeatedly for more than a year, during which time it lost almost none of its recharging capacity. This is the first time such an achievement has been reported in a laboratory-scale flow battery experiment.

A flow battery comprises two liquid-filled chambers used to produce an electrochemical reaction to store and release energy. The β-cyclodextrin additive accelerates this reaction due to its surprising catalytic ability, enabling the efficient flow of battery energy.

"This is a brand-new approach to developing flow battery electrolytes," said Wei Wang, a battery researcher who led the investigation into the new method. "We showed that you can use a totally different type of catalyst designed to accelerate energy conversion."

Flow batteries could be scaled up to massive sizes, allowing them to store vast amounts of energy. However, they require mined minerals such as vanadium that are expensive and, in some cases, controlled by a few countries. Obtaining these minerals can also be damaging to the environment and local communities.

The breakthrough makes the new battery design a candidate for scaling up, according to the researchers.

"We cannot always dig the Earth for new materials," said Imre Gyuk, director of energy storage research at the DOE's Office of Electricity, in a statement. "We need to develop a sustainable approach with chemicals that we can synthesize in large amounts – just like the pharmaceutical and food industries."

Recently, there have been several breakthroughs that could reduce environmental damage from energy demands. Last week, we heard about scientists studying a way to exploit the capabilities of Mycorrhizal fungi to mitigate environmental issues caused by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Researchers have also discovered how to harvest electricity from humid air using nearly any material, and a new technology called SeaChange is designed to capture carbon dioxide using ocean water.

Permalink to story.

 
Soooo ..... does this indicate a rapid transition from growing corn to growing sugar beats or sugarcane? Considering the necessary Govt. substity to corn farmers, this would be a welcome change for the American tax payer ....
 
Oh goodie! Let's make the price of sugar skyrocket, like corn did when everyone said let's make alcohol out of a stable FOOD crop. Don't worry if it really isn't a good idea, uses more energy than it is worth...politicians need the farmers votes ya know.
 
It would be interesting to pull all the TS article titles that contain the word "battery" and "could" over the past 10 years and see what percentage have come to the real world. Zero?
 
Just another "battery" achievement that we will never see in common use.
I think this one is different (just an improvement to flow batteries). They proved already that it does not degrade after a year of daily cycling. The questions I have though is if that is the case even when its exposed to various weather conditions during use.
 
It would be interesting to pull all the TS article titles that contain the word "battery" and "could" over the past 10 years and see what percentage have come to the real world. Zero?
Cant be zero brother, because zero is the amount of credibility the anti climate change, anti EV, pro black smoke crowds comments and "thoughts" have.

And we could have a good, productive conversation about how many breakthroughs are killed simply by newer breakthroughs months or years later. But that would be stating the truth, and talking facts, and we all know how much they hate those.
 
There's so many different battery designs being researched currently and who knows which ones will make it all the way to the consumer level.
But imagine being at the point where the transition occurs and you had just bought your shiny new 18650 equipped car. Then the new tech comes out with a battery with double the range that has a lifetime twice or three times as long, is lighter, plus it charges in 10-15 minutes....
 
imagine being at the point where the transition occurs and you had just bought your shiny new 18650 equipped car. Then the new tech comes out with a battery with double the range that has a lifetime twice or three times as long, is lighter, plus it charges in 10-15 minutes....
The 18650 batteries are pretty old school now. I have 21700 batteries in my (admittedly rather simple) EV. These batteries hold a lot more charge for the volume taken, they charge quicker and also give out more power. The only downside with my very early generation of these batteries is that the packs can explode into flames :( The latest 46800 batteries are better (more charge, charge quicker, give out more oomph). "If" we ever get solid state batteries then that would answer most of my needs.
 
Back