Tesla temporarily halts mass production of Optimus robots citing design challenges

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 956   +13
Staff
In context: Elon Musk has long hyped Tesla's Optimus robots as a potentially transformative technology capable of eclipsing its electric vehicle business and driving the company toward a multitrillion-dollar valuation. Production, initially slated for later this year, is now reportedly delayed due to serious design challenges.

The Information reports that Tesla is scaling back plans to produce thousands of Optimus robots this year due to issues with their hand design. Sources familiar with the project say engineers are struggling to create human-like, dexterous hands, forcing a temporary production halt.

The insiders noted that Tesla has accumulated a stockpile of Optimus bodies missing hands and forearms, with no indication of when engineers will complete these partially built units and ready them for shipment. Musk confirmed the issues on a podcast but offered no timeline for their eventual rollout.     

Tesla first identified the problems last summer, prompting a significant reduction in the original production target. After uncovering additional glitches, the company temporarily halted mass production and redirected resources to address the challenges and implement other improvements. 

The company initially aimed to produce at least 5,000 Optimus units by year-end, prompting pushback from engineers who considered the target unrealistic. After the protests, the company revised the goal to 2,000 units for the remainder of 2025. 

The issues with the robot's hand and arm design are not new. Earlier this year, Elon Musk publicly acknowledged the challenges in interviews, emphasizing that achieving human-like dexterity in the hands was the most difficult part of the design process.   

Despite the hardware challenges, Musk remains optimistic about the Optimus project's future. He recently posted a video on X showing the humanoid robot learning Kung Fu. Another video, shared by the official Tesla Optimus account, showed the bot practicing Kung Fu moves alongside actor Jared Leto on the red carpet at the world premiere of Disney's Tron: Ares.

Elon Musk unveiled Optimus in August 2021 as a general-purpose, bipedal humanoid robot designed to perform tasks that are unsafe, repetitive, or tedious for humans. Earlier this year, a former project leader publicly disagreed with Musk, arguing that robots like Optimus are not suited for warehouses, logistics, or manufacturing environments.
    

Permalink to story:

 
No one tries to produce anything until design issues are worked out. If Optimus doesn't have a function hand it also means they are very late on product testing, product safety and product quality assurance. Things just seems to be done a little haphazardly at Optimus.

Every product I have worked on has had the final product designed months (possibly requiring minor tweaks) for a year before entering low rate production. We spend months in system, software product safety and quality assurance to ensure it is safe to use with a variety of possible environments for the final product. They (Musk) seem to make really overly optimistic design and production schedules that they don't update until it is clear they will never make the deadline. This will be another Full Self Driving event which we are still wait for how many years has it been now?
 
I’m not sure which is worse: Tesla and Musk, or the stockholders and investors. The obsession with getting rich quick and buying into “messiah-led” tech companies has reached absurd levels. These people are so focused on driving up stock prices to make easy money that they ignore basic technical and management issues.

As long as Musk claims things are amazing (or will be in just 6–12 months), the money keeps pouring in. Credit where it’s due; Musk has an incredible ability to raise funds for his companies, even after his full turn toward “evil tech overlord” status and that DOGE stunt. But that doesn’t make him, or Tesla, truly great companies.
 
No one tries to produce anything until design issues are worked out. If Optimus doesn't have a function hand it also means they are very late on product testing, product safety and product quality assurance. Things just seems to be done a little haphazardly at Optimus.

Every product I have worked on has had the final product designed months (possibly requiring minor tweaks) for a year before entering low rate production. We spend months in system, software product safety and quality assurance to ensure it is safe to use with a variety of possible environments for the final product. They (Musk) seem to make really overly optimistic design and production schedules that they don't update until it is clear they will never make the deadline. This will be another Full Self Driving event which we are still wait for how many years has it been now?
That's because these robots are meant for internal use initially to inform changes on the design, development, and production. It's not meant to be used in a variety of environments for a while: https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-.../tesla-tsla-q4-2024-earnings-call-transcript/
Elon Musk said:
Will we succeed in building 10,000 exactly by the end of December this year? Probably not, but will we succeed in making several thousand? Yes, I think we will. Will those several thousand Optimus robots be doing useful things by the end of the year? Yes, I'm confident they will do useful things. Those Optimus in use at the Tesla factories for production design 1 will inform how will we change for production design 2, which we expect to launch next year. And our goal is to ramp up Optimus production faster than maybe anything has ever been ramped, meaning like aspirationally in order of magnitude, ramp per year.
[...]
This is an entirely new supply chain, it's entirely new technology. There's nothing off the shelf to use. We tried desperately with Optimus to use any existing motors or any actuators, sensors. Nothing worked for a humanoid robot at any price.
[...]
Well, for this year, we expect to just close the loop with Optimus being used internally at Tesla because we obviously can easily use several thousand humanoid robots at Tesla for, I think, the most boring, annoying tasks in the factory, like the tasks nobody wants to do, where we have to beg people to do this task. And then they -- it's like they're totally happy to do the boring dangerous repetitive testing no humans want to do.
That's something that only the fastest moving companies would do. Elon Musk has also said that Chinese companies are only real competition in this space (along with EVs) and recently said that the hands are the most complicated thing in a humanoid robot (unless you cheap out):
 
That's because these robots are meant for internal use initially to inform changes on the design, development, and production. It's not meant to be used in a variety of environments for a while:
If that were the true intent there would be no need to disclose they would be delaying production or had design flaws as Optimus is a private company and it would not affect any external customers.
 
If that were the true intent there would be no need to disclose they would be delaying production or had design flaws as Optimus is a private company and it would not affect any external customers.
Tesla is a public company working on Optimus (a future product). There was also no disclosure of a delay. This news is based on an anonymous source.
 
Can you think of a personality you trust to produce AI and robots less than Elon Musk? Just asking, because I can't.
 
The only thing fElon is good at is hyping things his companies have great difficulty producing. Yet people still listen to him for some reason.
Possibly because no one in recent history produced a viable electric car, but he did. No one ever made a reusable rocket, the shuttle was technically reusable, but practically had to be rebuilt after every flight whereas Space-X has done little more than clean up the rocket and refuel it. If his companies were producing products that anyone else ever produced, then I would be more critical of him.
 
Back