You sure you are talking about Intel? According to the review from this very site the 10900k run cooler and was equally or more efficient than the 3700x and the 3600. So what the actual duck are you talking about?
I think you are talking about the review from the laptop cpu (10980hk). Because the 10900k does not run cooler, nor is more efficient than any of AMD's cpu you mentioned. By the way, the 10900k has a TDP rated 125w, all cores locked at 4.3 ghz. You should read both the 10900k and 10980hk reviews again, because though the 10980hk is a great cpu, nothing you said is true.
Uhm, yeah, right. Check the 10900k review. Power draw on blender was 205watts and it finishes the task at 805seconds. So the total consumption was 45wh. The 3600 was pulling 150watts and finishes the task at 1200 seconds or something along those lines. Total consumption was 55wh.
It's worth noting that the measured power consumption values are for the entire system, so there will be a difference in platform/motherboard efficiency within this situation. For the 10900K, an Asus ROG Maximus XII Extreme was used, whereas the 3600 was in a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master. There's probably not much in it, though.
Which means the 10900k is more efficient than like 70% of the ryzen product stack. It only loses to 2 cpus and ties the 3700x more or less. But yeah, fanboys are fanboys, what you gonna do
Nothing to add from what already neeyik said. Don't be too rush to call people fanboys, I'm actually answering to this comment from an Intel Core i5 laptop, needless to say that I have a Rysen cpu in my desktop pc. I've used and I'm still using Intel and AMD cpus, and also owned AMD and Nvidia gpus. Not what I'd call a fanboy so.... come again?Which means the 10900k is more efficient than like 70% of the ryzen product stack. It only loses to 2 cpus and ties the 3700x more or less. But yeah, fanboys are fanboys, what you gonna do
You said nothing I said is true, while you are wrong, and didn't apologize. Ohkay
I still don't get what's so hard for you to understand that the core i9 isn't the most efficient cpu around. Neeyik already put it in simple terms. Also, you can hardly tell if a cpu is more efficient than other by just taking one test's result and going straight to conclussions, such as " 10900k is more efficient than like 70% of the ryzen product stack". From my point of view and reading the very whole of it, that's just nonesense. Finally, I think there nothing to apologize for... but if that makes you happy, I'm sorry my good fellow techspot reader!
Unless you're being sarcastic, but I think your i9 9900k is still a great cpu. Depends on what you want to do with more cores & threads anyway.
Yeah brother I was being sarcastic. It's in my laptop and the 9900k will be a solid performer for years.
