How about the biggest dregs of society, the parasitic corporate executives?Crypto miners are nothing but facilitators for drug dealers, paedophiles, terrorist funding and any other dregs of society scum you want to name.
The problem is that as bad as they are, the system in place is hardly any better.Actually at this time, this is very likely true.
But in the future if (Or more likely, when) the major coins start dropping in value due to cracking down on mining operations, Drug Cartels will be doing a lot more than facilitating and will just start building mining farms and fully take the major coins over.
What's really needed is a global effort for everybody to reject Cryptos as currency and well, that's not going to happen: cat's out of the bag and you can't really avoid it now so in essence, yes cryptos are on the way to becoming the defacto money laundering operation for everyone beyond the reach of the State sanctioned money.
Ending involvement in crapto does not mean ending study of it. The article clearly states that he has studied it for years.4)"Palmer also revealed he ended any involvement with crypto back in 2015."
Then how are you supposed to know how the market has developed and how the tech evolved...?
This seems to be just another Chihuahua barking at a pit bull.
Personally, when it enables stuff like this, I would say the system is even worse. However, I bet the vast majority of people would be afraid to change the system. IMO, that is what really needs to be done - change the system to something like this - https://sacred-economics.com/ I certainly cannot say what would work better.The problem is that as bad as they are, the system in place is hardly any better.
I don't see how it's different. They are both the killing of a wholeIt's completely different. But at this point you'll try to argue with me that even a book can kill.
This is a different argument than the one you used previously. Even then, it can be seen two ways. Indeed if everything is tied to a person or organization, criminals can no longer be anonymous, and they can be identified, meaning they would no longer have the same incentive to do it.The only solution I see is to make cryptocurrency traceable in a similar fashion to fiat currency. All online transactions should be tied to a name (sender and receiver). It will destroy one of the core values (anonymity), but it should help curb the illegal activities.
You can't really ask for a ransom if the money can be traced back to you irl.
Decentralized systems are not immune to criminal activity. It just takes a more sinister form where it's much harder to catch ppl.I don't see how it's different. They are both the killing of a whole
This is a different argument than the one you used previously. Even then, it can be seen two ways. Indeed if everything is tied to a person or organization, criminals can no longer be anonymous, and they can be identified, meaning they would no longer have the same incentive to do it.
On the flip side, if everything is decentralized, there is no single point where criminals can attack. And if everything is anonymous, including the accounts of the wealthy, combined with decentralization, there is nothing to target in the first place. And only crypto can achieve this.
Sure. He could have studied it from 2010 to 2015. That would still make his opinion outdated. It would be like trying to give an opinion of the situation of the CPU market today based on what happened between 2010 and 2015.Ending involvement in crapto does not mean ending study of it. The article clearly states that he has studied it for years.
This is not wrong. But in the context that I was trying to explain, it removes the criminals completely in terms of ransomware. For example, even though they have used Bitcoin as a means of payment for ransomware attacks, they cannot put ransomware on the bitcoin network itself. So in other words, if you had your important files on a decentralized blockchain, ransomware by itself would become irrelevant, and ransomware attacks would simply stop happening.Decentralized systems are not immune to criminal activity. It just takes a more sinister form where it's much harder to catch ppl.
"After years of studying it, I believe that cryptocurrency is an inherently right-wing, hyper-capitalistic technology built primarily to amplify the wealth of its proponents through a combination of tax avoidance, diminished regulatory oversight and artificially enforced scarcity,"
Υeah, no I am not byin' this guy's arguments.
He says the rich control crypto and it's a scheme to make the rich richer but imagine, you ARE rich already, you have enough money to last you 10 lifetimes and then some, why bother?
Leftist propaganda. Soon they're goin' to involve Trump too.
If that was the case they wouldn't be pushing for CBDCs.
Enough is never enough to satisfy the wealthy. They suffer from a fear of lack. The trouble is, even with more, their fear of lack never goes away. If you think its leftist propaganda, have a look at Rupert Murdock.
Tell that to the ones in Nigeria that are using Bitcoin.And it's irrelevant if the early buyers of crypto got lucky, it's an objective fact that they profited off the ignorance of others without any contribution to society. And society was not improved in any way by crypto or the large-scale scamming - I'd argue that the contrary is true.
I'm not sure that they suffer from a fear of lack, I believe that they're just unbelievably greedy. Think about it, just to become a billionaire, your main driving force has to be avarice because you didn't stop long before you got there. Like, I don't think that I could ever be a billionaire because I'd have retired before I hit ten million.Enough is never enough to satisfy the wealthy. They suffer from a fear of lack. The trouble is, even with more, their fear of lack never goes away. If you think its leftist propaganda, have a look at Rupert Murdock.
Of course he will because he's rich. The way things are now, only the rich enjoy capitalism. That's the problem with the system today, a problem that didn't exist 50 years ago because 50 years ago, markets were competitive with many players. Now markets are all oligopolies, duopolies and monopolies. That's a lot less people employed and a lot more wealth concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people.I'm sure he didn't profit in any way, shape, or form. Sounds like a random "woke up on the wrong side of the bed" rant but he will continue to enjoy the benefits of capitalism.
What about Jeff "Lex Luthor" Bezos, Bill "The Scarecrow" Gates, Elon "Brainiac" Musk, Charles "Sinestro" Koch and Warren "The Kingpin" Buffett?Yeah, I would love to see him and Soros in a fireplace setting, debate who's ego is bigger and who's world domination view is thought to be superior...
Largest PPV event evAr..
Yeah, they whine as if this ISN'T what has been happening for the last 50 years or so. It's hilarious!Bunch of crybabies tilted by someone saying that capitalism is being organized to concentrate wealth with the 1%, and that crypto is just another tool they use for that end, lol.
Where do you think that Herbert Wright got the idea for the Ferengi?Suddenly the anti-crypto gang rushes to it's defense, because of McCarthyist indoctrination.
Well you have to remember that they don't see society as a single entity. They think that they still live in the jungle where you have to do terrible things to survive. It's like the last 10,000 years of progress never happened.And it's irrelevant if the early buyers of crypto got lucky, it's an objective fact that they profited off the ignorance of others without any contribution to society. And society was not improved in any way by crypto or the large-scale scamming - I'd argue that the contrary is true.
If they had any concept of human history, you wouldn't have to tell them this but these were the dumb kids who didn't pay attention in school but still managed to escape with a "C" average.A system driven only by the concentration of wealth eventually brings ruin to society, as the real production of wealth, science and culture is held hostage by the system built around those who control the economy.
I say the same thing about landlords. I think that renting shouldn't be legal because it's creating a HUGE housing crisis in the USA right now.Just have a look at how Elsevier parasitically profits off scientific work while doing absolutely nothing but control it's circulation.
Considering the end result of the last mining boom, it's you that's going to need good luck as most people lost their shirts to that scam. Just don't invest any serious money in it and you should be fine.He's just mad because his coin was just a joke and actually a SCAM. Many other coins within crypto are actually valuable and being used for things by many companies and transactions. Other then that, not going to entertain the rest who are still mad about crypto and blaming miners for GPU shortage. I'll continue making money mining and in the crypto exchange. Thanks and good luck all.
Honestly, I cannot see their drive for more, more, more without a fear of lack. Avarice likely has a part to play in the equation, however, if they did not fear being without, I cannot see them continuing to strive for more. However, I am sure all of them have forgotten what it is like to be poor if they ever knew what it was like.I'm not sure that they suffer from a fear of lack, I believe that they're just unbelievably greedy. Think about it, just to become a billionaire, your main driving force has to be avarice because you didn't stop long before you got there.
Right there with you.Like, I don't think that I could ever be a billionaire because I'd have retired before I hit ten million.
I certainly agree that they are sick.I understand that the most precious commodity in existence isn't anything tangible. The most precious commodity cannot be bought or sold and nobody really knows how much of it that they have. That commodity is of course, time.
If I reach a level of wealth where I'm on easy street for the rest of my life, I'm retiring. I want the maximum number of days on easy street in my life and spending time raking in more money than I need to be completely happy would actually make my life worse. Why would I work when I don't have to? Why would I occupy a job that I no longer need when there is surely someone else who does need it?
These people work when they don't have to, occupy a job that they don't need which means that someone who does need it won't be able to get it and they take all of this money out of the economy and sit on it. That money can't be used by anyone else to keep the economy going so it effectively no longer exists as usable wealth. Despite all this, these lunatics keep on working and taking as much as they can despite the fact that they'll never use it. This is a type of psychosis. It's similar to having a gambling addiction. These people are greedy and sick.
I agree capitalism has a limited life remaining. IMO, it is unsustainable, and wealth is an illusion. The way I see it, civilization has not progressed beyond feudalism.Capitalism as we know it has less than 20 years of life remaining and nothing can stop that now. The question is whether or not it will end peacefully or will the rich die at the business ends of pitchforks all over again? I sure hope that it isn't the latter but if it is, the rich will have nobody to blame but themselves.
Υeah, no I am not byin' this guy's arguments.
He says the rich control crypto and it's a scheme to make the rich richer but imagine, you ARE rich already, you have enough money to last you 10 lifetimes and then some, why bother?
Leftist propaganda. Soon they're goin' to involve Trump too.