These Wall-E-like robots are making Texas sidewalks safer

midian182

Posts: 11,746   +178
Staff member
In a nutshell: Most people aren't happy about seeing robots rolling around our streets, be they delivering something or on patrol. But a new machine being deployed in Texas has a function that should be more welcome: assessing sidewalks to ensure they are safe to use for people with disabilities.

Residents in the city of Burleson, Texas, are the first to see the Wall-E-like Daxbots trundling around their neighborhoods.

The machines, also known as ADA-compliance or urban service robots, come packed with sensors and mapping technology used to measure sidewalk slope, width, and potential obstacles that could pose barriers for people with disabilities.

Burleson Police Officer Colin Gregory told CBS that the robots make sure that someone in a wheelchair, for example, has the best ADA-compliant sidewalks available to use.

The Daxboxs are able to measure around six to seven miles of sidewalks per day. That's about three times more than what a typical person could manage during the same time period, according to officials.

Gregory added that the Daxboxs will stop if residents walk up to them and allow them to take a selfie with the robot, should they wish.

A recent report showed how the proliferation of food delivery robots has led to attacks on the machines by residents. With many arguing that they clutter sidewalks and endanger pedestrians, videos have appeared online showing people kicking, grabbing, and even attempting to destroy the bots. While some of these do look like attempted theft, others look like simple anger toward the machines.

The Daxbots' purpose appears to make the robots immune to these sentiments. Reports say once neighbors in the area learned that their purpose was to improve accessibility, reactions to the robots moved from apprehensive to appreciative.

Gregory poked fun at the common fear of robots and AI enslaving humanity, emphasizing that the Daxbots are not here to dominate or take over, adding "but again, they're adorable."

One issue that seems to be skipped over is the prospect of more robots taking human jobs. Like AI, the promise of a Daxbot being able to perform the same task faster than a person carries implications.

Should it prove successful, though, don't be surprised to see more Daxbots appearing on sidewalks across the country.

Permalink to story:

 
The article claims this robot travelling 6 to 7 miles a day covers three times more than a human. Nonsense.A human can cover the same area in about three hours. We're faster, not slower. PR lies by a government body that was duped and loved its new toy that needs to recharge before locking up requiring someone to go get it. Seems like a very poor investment.
 
The article claims this robot travelling 6 to 7 miles a day covers three times more than a human. Nonsense.A human can cover the same area in about three hours. We're faster, not slower. PR lies by a government body that was duped and loved its new toy that needs to recharge before locking up requiring someone to go get it. Seems like a very poor investment.
It's not enough to walk that distance, one has to record information too, so yeah, I believe the article.
 
Go Pro and human is superior to a rolling computer program.
A Go Pro is only going to give you a visual recording of the area surveyed. You still need to assess the recording to evaluate surface condition, obstructions etc.

The robot can record the slope gradient, width and condition of the survey area, all while assessing and adding location data for each point of interest, all simultaneously.
 
Back