Trump names Jensen Huang, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sergey Brin for tech advisory council

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
What just happened? The White House is turning to Silicon Valley's top executives to help shape federal technology policy, naming Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle chairman Larry Ellison, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, and Google co-founder Sergey Brin to President Trump's revived Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

The high-profile appointments mark a clear pivot for Trump's second-term tech strategy – one centered on aligning the private sector's most powerful figures with national goals around artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, and emerging industrial policy.

According to an executive order released in January, the 13-member President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, or PCAST, will ultimately expand to as many as 24 members. It will "advise the President on matters involving science, technology, education, and innovation policy," and will also provide guidance meant to bolster national security, workforce resilience, and economic growth.

The administration named David Sacks, Trump's AI and crypto czar, and longtime White House technology adviser Michael Kratsios as co-chairs of the council. Both are expected to coordinate the group's policy recommendations, which could shape upcoming decisions on federal AI frameworks and state-level regulatory disputes.

Huang's presence underscores the importance of artificial intelligence hardware in the administration's technology agenda. Nvidia's dominance in AI chipmaking has positioned Huang as one of Washington's most sought-after voices on industry strategy and supply chain policy.

The inclusion of Brin, who has largely maintained a low public profile since stepping back from day-to-day work at Alphabet, signals a broadening of the White House's outreach to long-established tech leaders as it seeks to influence the next era of innovation policy.

Trump's first-term advisory council featured fewer household names, but this iteration carries far more industry weight. The shift also reflects a thawing relationship between the tech elite and the Trump administration. Many executives who kept their distance during his first term have since aligned themselves more closely with his economic and technology initiatives.

Trump has repeatedly emphasized that the US "has the opportunity to lead the world in AI," framing the administration's policies as enablers of a "Golden Age of Innovation." In its announcement, the White House said PCAST under Trump will focus on "the opportunities and challenges that emerging technologies present to the American workforce."

Though past presidents, dating back to George W. Bush, have convened similar advisory bodies, the newly constituted council stands out for its concentration of active power players from the technology industry – individuals whose companies not only dominate global markets but also fund or partner with key government initiatives. Whether their private-sector ambitions align neatly with public policy goals may shape the next phase of the nation's technology trajectory.

Permalink to story:

 
You could let 1% of the people have all the nation's wealth. You could help your rich friends get richer by cutting their taxes. And bailing them out when they gamble and lose. You could ignore the needs of the poor for health care and education. Your media would appear free, but would secretly be controlled by one person and his family. You could wiretap phones. You could torture foreign prisoners. You could have rigged elections. You could lie about why you go to war. You could fill your prisons with one particular racial group, and no one would complain. You could use the media to scare the people into supporting policies that are against their interests.
 
God help us all. I know Zuckerberg etc are pretty morally ambiguous but how can they look that reptile in the eye and shake his hand knowing what we all really know about him? It seems there is no low the bro's wont stoop to for a few more shekels.
 
Trump's got a lot of advisory boards that do absolutely nothing but use their positions to lobby their own interest. Its cheaper that paying anyone on K Street to do it for them.
 
Fascism in broad daylight and on full display: the merging of government and private companies, creating a fascist state, one built on surveillance and data mining of all of us. Government, out of necessity, just keeps growing bigger. When will people wake up instead of celebrating this.
 
Fascism in broad daylight and on full display: the merging of government and private companies, creating a fascist state, one built on surveillance and data mining of all of us. Government, out of necessity, just keeps growing bigger. When will people wake up instead of celebrating this.
People have woken up, the sentiment towards AI in general is deservedly negative, but there isn't much we can do about it because companies have colluded with government.
A merger of government and tech is getting unanimous support from both sides, as a matter of controlling the public, we're seeing this especially with age verification being forced at the OS level, even into Linux.
 
By Einstein's ghost, stop with the theatrics and just give tech CEOs executive power over the American people... Wrap it up, I got stuff to do.
 
Fascism in broad daylight and on full display: the merging of government and private companies, creating a fascist state, one built on surveillance and data mining of all of us. Government, out of necessity, just keeps growing bigger. When will people wake up instead of celebrating this.
Have a look at the fasci on display in court houses, the DIME(ten cent coin) and the gigantic fasci of the lincoln monument on both sides holding up lincoln's hands. "FASCISM" is front and center openly displayed larger than life and is obvious af for generations.
 
You could let 1% of the people have all the nation's wealth
This backwards zero-sum-game thinking should have had the final nail placed in its coffin when the USSR fell. These tech leaders didn't get rich by taking money from others, they did so by creating wealth. This explains why, since 2008, the US GDP has grown almost 7 times faster than the EU.

You could help your rich friends get richer by cutting their taxes.
If you're referring to the Trump tax cuts:

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most


And bailing them out when they gamble and lose.
You mean like Obama bailed out his labor union backers through Chrysler and GM? And also bailed out AIG, Citigroup, and Bank of America when their bets on the housing market all went bad?
 
Back