Trump wants to bring Japan's tiny kei cars to US roadways

In US those SUV are listed as trucks.
That mean less strict emission limits.
That means lower additional costs to reach those limits.
And its easier (and cheaper) to reach the safety standards on bigger V-hicles

All together it makes the price difference between cute small city car and big SUV insignificant.
For close distances transporting we will see more BEVs than small ICVs.
"In Japan, a new kei car or truck typically sells for under $15,000."

Show me the big SUV with an insignificant price difference to that.
 
I think they’re fine as long as they’re kept off highways. They should be allowed only on roadways with speed limits of up to 45 mph. That’s the only place where people want to use them anyways. They should be safe there as long as they’re not involved in a head-on collision.

As for me, I think I’d only ever get a personal mobility vehicle, not a tiny car or motorcycle.
Just because people don't know how to use the passing lane and want to 90 in a 65 does not mean these things should be banned on highways. They drive on forgien highways with other cars just fine.
 
"In Japan, a new kei car or truck typically sells for under $15,000."

Show me the big SUV with an insignificant price difference to that.
My post begins with .. In US
Yours with .. In Japan

Different countries, different habits, different regulations, different taxes, ....

PS: In November I have bought Suzuki Vitara under $20,000.
 
Last edited:
As a european watching just rolled in stuff and what americans put on roads it's just insane to me to read about american 'safety standards' - over here - and japan as well - you need to get your car to the TÜV every 2 years for certification of road safety. You can't jerry rig **** or drive a rusted through truck for 20 years. But I understand that what they are talking about is that in the US the regulation is about getting hit by an SUV would squish a kei car - kei cars aren't unsafe, they are just not gonna survive a 4t murrican truck.
Let's put partisan crap to the side and agree that smaller cars help everybody in terms of price/congestion/parking/risk to pedestrians/emissions and rejoice.
This mixes a few different things together. Periodic inspections (TÜV/JCI) are about maintenance and roadworthiness, not crash safety standards. The US absolutely has federal safety standards for crashworthiness, airbags, crumple zones, etc....they’re just enforced at manufacture, not via biannual inspections.

Also, kei cars are statistically less safe in multi vehicle crashes, not because they’re “badly built,” but because physics doesn’t care about intent. Mass and ride height matter, especially in mixed fleets. That’s exactly why regulators consider compatibility, not just whether a car is small.

You can argue for smaller vehicles on cost, congestion, emissions, and pedestrian safety grounds (those are real tradeoffs), but pretending size has no safety downside...or that the US has no standards at all........is just replacing one oversimplification with another.

Its fun to watch Americans defend their love of "bigger is better". If they can't be bothered to stay off their phone while driving and have to take their eyes off the road ahead to fiddle with their "infotainment" display there will never be any escape from bigger, heavier, more polluting tanks. Everyone will have to drive them because survival in anything less will become impossible.
This is a false chain of inevitability. Distracted driving exists everywhere, including Europe and Japan, and it’s addressed through enforcement, UI rules, and ADAS...not by turning cars into “tanks.”

Vehicle bloat didn’t happen because people are uniquely irresponsible, it happened because of regulatory incentives, market segmentation, and consumer preference interacting over decades. That’s a policy problem, not a moral failing.

Nice try. Watching simple arguments masquerade as insight is good for a chuckle. 😊
 
What winning? What all was promised on day one, that actually affects people, was actually accomplished? Lower prices? Nope. Stop the war in Ukraine? Nope.

How did a political party create inflation? Do you know what caused the inflation?

"Record inflation"? Here are the averages for inflation during the Biden administration:
2021 4.7%
2022 8.0%
2023 4.1%
2024 2.9%

Here are examples of high inflation:

1947: 14.4%
1974: 11.0%
1979: 11.3%
1980: 13.3%
1981: 10.3%

"dumbocrats" seriously grow up.

I don't understand how anyone thinks any politician especially one that has been rich their whole live cares about anyone who can't benefit them. Do you remember how foreign the word "groceries" was for Trump? Food in his kitchen just appears he has no idea how much any individual item costs. When was the last time he put fuel into a vehicle he was driving?

How can you champion someone who can't possibly know the problems that most Americans have? How can you champion someone who made impossible promises during their campaign and who accomplished little if any of it. Politicians shouldn't be allowed to lie to get elected and they shouldn't be allowed to profit from their position. This administration has been showered with "donations" and "gifts" from anyone who can afford to do so specifically to get favorable treatment. We are told people who represent us, work for us, but clearly that just isn't true, they work for themselves, big industry, and anyone who will shower them with praise, they haven't earned, and money.

If anything is made better for the average American, it's going to be despite the administration and not because of it.
You’re arguing with yourself more than anyone else here. No serious person claims inflation was created by one political party, but pretending policy has zero effect is just as unserious.

Inflation was global, driven by COVID supply shocks, stimulus under both administrations, and an energy shock from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. actually recovered faster than most peer countries, with inflation falling from 8% to under 3% without a recession....that’s not nothing, whether you like the administration or not.

Cherry picking post WWII inflation spikes to argue “this wasn’t real inflation” is odd. For people buying groceries, paying rent, or renewing insurance, 8% absolutely counts as “record” for their lifetime, which is the context people are speaking in.

As for “impossible promises” welcome to politics. Every modern administration overpromises, underdelivers, and compromises. Trump promised to eliminate the deficit, bring back manufacturing overnight, replace the ACA, and end wars...none of that happened. Holding one side to a purity standard you don’t apply to the other isn’t skepticism, it’s team sports.

On corruption ... yes, money in politics is a problem. That’s not a Trump only issue ... it’s systemic and bipartisan. If your standard is “rich politicians don’t understand regular people,” that disqualifies most of Washington, including the guy you’re implicitly defending.

You’re right about one thing ... politicians rarely work primarily for average Americans. But pretending that outcomes are never affected by who’s in power, or that “nothing matters,” is just nihilism dressed up as realism.
 
I think they’re fine as long as they’re kept off highways. They should be allowed only on roadways with speed limits of up to 45 mph. That’s the only place where people want to use them anyways. They should be safe there as long as they’re not involved in a head-on collision.

As for me, I think I’d only ever get a personal mobility vehicle, not a tiny car or motorcycle.
“They’re fine unless something bad happens” is a weird standard. Motorcycles, convertibles, classic cars, and even side by sides are far more dangerous in crashes, yet no one suggests banning them from normal roads.

This isn’t about safety...it’s about people being uncomfortable with anything that doesn’t look like a 5,000-lb SUV.
 
This isn’t about safety...it’s about people being uncomfortable with anything that doesn’t look like a 5,000-lb SUV.
Should I feel not safe enough in 2800lb car?

With some psychos on the reads I wont feel enough safe even in some thing like armored Tatra T 815-7 or armored Humwee

 
This mixes a few different things together. Periodic inspections (TÜV/JCI) are about maintenance and roadworthiness, not crash safety standards. The US absolutely has federal safety standards for crashworthiness, airbags, crumple zones, etc....they’re just enforced at manufacture, not via biannual inspections.

Also, kei cars are statistically less safe in multi vehicle crashes, not because they’re “badly built,” but because physics doesn’t care about intent. Mass and ride height matter, especially in mixed fleets. That’s exactly why regulators consider compatibility, not just whether a car is small.

You can argue for smaller vehicles on cost, congestion, emissions, and pedestrian safety grounds (those are real tradeoffs), but pretending size has no safety downside...or that the US has no standards at all........is just replacing one oversimplification with another.


This is a false chain of inevitability. Distracted driving exists everywhere, including Europe and Japan, and it’s addressed through enforcement, UI rules, and ADAS...not by turning cars into “tanks.”

Vehicle bloat didn’t happen because people are uniquely irresponsible, it happened because of regulatory incentives, market segmentation, and consumer preference interacting over decades. That’s a policy problem, not a moral failing.

Nice try. Watching simple arguments masquerade as insight is good for a chuckle. 😊
I fully agree with what you said about my post, I guess I didn't quite spell out what I meant - my first reaction hearing usa and safety just seems odd because of the strict regular inspections vs what I see on dashcam footage and stuff online and shows like "just rolled in". I did not mean to say the US doesn't have standards for crumple zones and crash tests, that was not my intention. Over here we also have rules about minimum speeds for vehicles to be allowed on bundesstrassen and autobahnen and slower vehicles only allowed on the slow lane. Kei cars are not legal in most european countries because they do not fullfill the safety standards for passengers due to lack of crumple zones and such. So, yes, it absolutely does have something to do with it! What I meant to say was that kei cars are technically safe for when they crash into something stationary at their rated slow max speeds but not safe in a crash with another moving vehicle - which, again, is also why they are illegal in most european countries for good reason.
 
I fully agree with what you said about my post, I guess I didn't quite spell out what I meant - my first reaction hearing usa and safety just seems odd because of the strict regular inspections vs what I see on dashcam footage and stuff online and shows like "just rolled in". I did not mean to say the US doesn't have standards for crumple zones and crash tests, that was not my intention. Over here we also have rules about minimum speeds for vehicles to be allowed on bundesstrassen and autobahnen and slower vehicles only allowed on the slow lane. Kei cars are not legal in most european countries because they do not fullfill the safety standards for passengers due to lack of crumple zones and such. So, yes, it absolutely does have something to do with it! What I meant to say was that kei cars are technically safe for when they crash into something stationary at their rated slow max speeds but not safe in a crash with another moving vehicle - which, again, is also why they are illegal in most european countries for good reason.
That’s fair, and I appreciate the clarification. I think where this often gets muddled is that people use “safety” as a single bucket when it’s really several different systems layered together....vehicle condition, crashworthiness, traffic rules, and fleet mix.

Dashcam compilations and shows like Just Rolled In mostly highlight maintenance and enforcement gaps, not the absence of crash standards. The US model assumes roadworthiness at manufacture and relies more on enforcement afterward, the EU/Japan model adds recurring inspections. Different philosophies, different failure modes.

On traffic rules, the US also uses minimum speeds and lane restrictions on many highways to manage speed differentials, precisely to accommodate slower vehicles and less confident drivers (including seniors), even if it’s applied less uniformly than on autobahns or bundesstrassen.

On kei cars, I think we’re largely in agreement. They’re engineered to be compliant and reasonably safe within their design envelope, low speeds, compatible mass, and a constrained operating environment. Once you put them into mixed, high speed traffic with large mass and ride height differentials, the physics works against them, which is exactly why Europe restricts them.

So yes, size and crumple zones absolutely matter, but so do speed regulation, lane discipline, enforcement, and fleet compatibility. No single rule explains “safety,” and focusing on just one piece tends to produce misleading conclusions.

And, of course, safety isn’t just hardware and rules...it also depends on responsible drivers and behavior. But I digress.
 
For what it's worth, europe has safety standards conforming mini cars between 9000 and 11000 Euro - so it's not like you can't make cheap small cars, they're just not Kei Cars. Dacia Sandero or Mitsubishi Space Star or Fiat Panda Life. They're 2+2kids Seaters tiny hatchbacks with around 60 to 70 PS able to do 120 km/h on german highways. Those sub 10000 models all come super barebones though, any amenities like AC and what not will drive the price up, but still, it's very much possible to make sub 10000 cars adhering to safety standards.
 
We're just gonna keep pretending the prior administration didn't give us the worst inflation in decades and let in tens of millions of illegals (where blue cities proceeded to give many of them thousands of dollars per month in benefits on our dime, keeping wages low, rents inflated, and ratcheting up societal unrest). Gotcha.


Back to the topic at hand, more kei-sized cars in the US would be epic. As someone who frequently drives through a major city for work, I am baffled as to why people think they need a freaking Escalade for their daily commute or 2-mile grocery run. These monstrosities are nothing more than glorified person-pulpifiers, offering no real benefit besides the ability to turn your typical pedestrian into a finer paste than last years model, so I for one would be happy to see these increasingly menacingly-sized vehicles penalized more proportionally at the insurance level and/or even just being flat-out restricted to operation by drivers of a new, higher licence level, between Class C and CDL.


"racheted up social unrest"? Now that's comedy given the divider in chief that's currently in office. An objective look at history will tell you that the deep divisions that currently exist in this country really only began when Agent Orange took office. "Good people on both sides..." said it all.
 
I would certainly take a long look at buying one of these if they were available in the U.S. One of the biggest mistakes I ever made was getting rid of my Ford Ranger pickup truck. Now the price of pickups, even used ones, is sky high and I constantly find I have need of a small pickup to haul this or that.
 
"Record inflation"? Here are the averages for inflation during the Biden administration:
2021 4.7%
2022 8.0%
2023 4.1%
2024 2.9%
TOTAL CUMLATIVE BIDENFLATION = 19.7%
Here are examples of high inflation:

1947: 14.4%
1974: 11.0%
1979: 11.3%
1980: 13.3%
1981: 10.3%
Looks like Trump was winning before Biden even got in! Biden gets the record for the highest consecutive, cumulative 4 years of inflation in modern US times at 20%!

2016 1.3%
2017 2.1%
2018 2.4%
2019 1.8%
TOTAL CUMLATIVE TRUMP INFLATION = 7.6%
 
Looks like Trump was winning before Biden even got in! Biden gets the record for the highest consecutive, cumulative 4 years of inflation in modern US times at 20%!

2016 1.3%
2017 2.1%
2018 2.4%
2019 1.8%
TOTAL CUMLATIVE TRUMP INFLATION = 7.6%
You can blame Covid 19 for some of that uptick. It wasn't Biden's fault and the pandemic started under Trump.
 
Back