This mixes a few different things together. Periodic inspections (TÜV/JCI) are about maintenance and roadworthiness, not crash safety standards. The US absolutely has federal safety standards for crashworthiness, airbags, crumple zones, etc....they’re just enforced at manufacture, not via biannual inspections.
Also, kei cars are statistically less safe in multi vehicle crashes, not because they’re “badly built,” but because physics doesn’t care about intent. Mass and ride height matter, especially in mixed fleets. That’s exactly why regulators consider compatibility, not just whether a car is small.
You can argue for smaller vehicles on cost, congestion, emissions, and pedestrian safety grounds (those are real tradeoffs), but pretending size has no safety downside...or that the US has no standards at all........is just replacing one oversimplification with another.
This is a false chain of inevitability. Distracted driving exists everywhere, including Europe and Japan, and it’s addressed through enforcement, UI rules, and ADAS...not by turning cars into “tanks.”
Vehicle bloat didn’t happen because people are uniquely irresponsible, it happened because of regulatory incentives, market segmentation, and consumer preference interacting over decades. That’s a policy problem, not a moral failing.
Nice try. Watching simple arguments masquerade as insight is good for a chuckle.