Unexpectedly high demand puts Motorola's Razr foldable on hold

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,178   +1,424
Staff member
Hurry up and wait: If you were anxiously waiting to toss your wallet to Motorola to pre-order its new Android clamshell Razr the day after Christmas, it looks like you're going to have to sew up that hole your money burned in your pocket. Pre-orders and next month's launch have been postponed until further notice.

Motorola was poised to open pre-orders for its clamshell Razr with the foldable screen on December 26. Unfortunately, the company said in an emailed statement that it has to delay pre-orders and the phone’s January launch because of high demand.

Since its announcement in November, the new Motorola Razr has received unparalleled excitement and interest from consumers. Demand has been high, and as a result, has quickly outgrown supply predictions.

Motorola has decided to adjust Razr’s presale and launch timing to better meet consumer demand. We are working to determine the appropriate quantity and schedule to ensure that more consumers have access to Razr at launch.

We do not anticipate a significant shift from our original availability timeline.

The company does not expect the postponement to be too extended but was vague about how long we would have to wait for more information on release timing.

The high demand is not that surprising. When Motorola unveiled the rebooted Razr flip phone back in November (after numerous leaks), our first impressions were that the phone maker is taking foldable-screen technology in the right direction.

When everyone else is trying to make full-sized smartphones that convert into tablets, Moto comes along and says, “No. We’re going to make a full-size smartphone more compact.”

This vision makes more sense. A folding phone that is also a tablet is a novelty. A folding smartphone that fits better in your pocket is practical. Plus, there is the nostalgia factor. We miss our clamshells.

That said, Motorola still has a long way to go to prove the phone is worthy of the $1,500 price tag. Too many unknowns remain since it has not been released into the wild, like screen durability, dust protection, hinge mechanics, and overall performance.

Until some hands-on time is available, it’s hard to justify throwing down a grand and a half on a device that might suffer a launch similar to Samsung’s premature release of the Galaxy Fold. Of course, this does not dissuade many early adopters, as is evidenced by the forced delay.

Permalink to story.

 
I loved my old Razr and never would have quit using it if it hadn't taken a bath in the washing machine. I'd love another one but $1,500 is simply ridicules ..... I'll wait until consumer cellular has them on special for $150 ...... LOL
 
This is ultimately a substandard (using Samsung as the Standard) Android phone with only a single gimmick - it folds.

I don't see what the hype is for.

They want me to trade gorilla glass from the best Galaxy Note 10 to go to plastic???
 
The title should be "Unexpectedly high levels of nostalgia put Motorola's Razr foldable on hold"
They want $1500 for this thing. If not for the ubiquitous nature of Credit Cards...or cell phone stores leasing cellphones on people's plans, its demand would be extremely low.

But still: you're paying iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 10 (1TB) money for a substandard Android phone just because it folds???
 
They want $1500 for this thing. If not for the ubiquitous nature of Credit Cards...or cell phone stores leasing cellphones on people's plans, its demand would be extremely low.

But still: you're paying iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy Note 10 (1TB) money for a substandard Android phone just because it folds???
You don't know how it will perform yet. You have some of the most negative comments on this forum, many of them are baseless.
 
This is ultimately a substandard (using Samsung as the Standard) Android phone
If that's the case, it's above standard if Samsung is your benchmark. Motorola's recent effort to have Android One phones and decent, timely Android Updates far surpasses Samsung's.
 
They always do this. They have some manufacturing or design problem which forces them to postpone an already announced product. And then they tell they needed to postpone it because of the unexpectedly high demand. When in reality they just failed to deliver. Of course the sheeple will eat the marketing lie and want now a piece of the problematic product even more.
 
Proves that there is a demand for an Android flip phone. One that doesn't have to have one big connected screen. 2 small ones would be useful too.
 
Proves that there is a demand for an Android flip phone. One that doesn't have to have one big connected screen. 2 small ones would be useful too.
It doesn't prove anything until they release an actual number of pre-orders. Even then, if there are no deposits, those numbers are highly speculative of actual demand as many may have put their name down and not go through with the purchase.
 
I was always a big fan of Motorolla and loved the v3 they are revamping it cool been a big Samsung fan since Motorolla's down fall so to pay more than my 1 TB galaxy S10+ ($1599 ATT) and for smaller form factor id expect it to be packing much better hardware/software/features to be a valid argument for a bang for buck comparison
 
This is ultimately a substandard (using Samsung as the Standard) Android phone with only a single gimmick - it folds.

I don't see what the hype is for.

They want me to trade gorilla glass from the best Galaxy Note 10 to go to plastic???

The folding mechanic is actually really nice. More compact design, a bit of extra protection for your screen when it's folded closed, you get the 2nd smaller screen that's more discreet, and you can actually use your nicer rear-facing camera with flash to take selfies (which was demonstrated on Unbox Therapy). I find this to be a very practical use for folding screens.
 
Back