Why $7.99 has become the sweet spot for indie games on Steam

[Daniel Sims]

DO YOU AGREE? Affordable indie games have gained popularity on Steam in recent years, partially due to an ongoing trend of well-liked, quirky co-op titles, several of which cost $8. The developer of one of the more successful examples theorized that this price strikes a psychological midpoint between $5 and $10.

In an interview with Game File, Peak co-creator Nick Kaman suggested that the game's $7.99 MSRP feels close enough to $5 in the minds of average consumers. While the developer's hypothesis has no scientific basis, it's hard to argue with a game that sold over 10 million copies.

The price of the comedic co-op title was inspired by a similar game, Content Warning, which launched for $7.99 in 2024. Kaman explained that while the developers of Peak and Content Warning were collaborating on the former, they half-jokingly worked out a theory to determine the pricing.

Peak launched last year at a discounted price of $5, and the two studios determined that $4, $5, and $6 essentially feel the same. Meanwhile, $3 feels like $2, and a $2 game feels like it's free.

Moreover, $12 feels like $10, but increasing the price to $13 begins to feel like $15. Eventually, they reasoned that $7.99 felt closer to $5 despite being closer to $10, creating the largest gap between the perceived cost and the actual price tag.

The idea might have merit. Content Warning has sold at least 5 million copies, but over 6 million users grabbed the game during its day-one giveaway. Another similar $7.99 indie title, RV There Yet, has sold over one million since launching in October. However, another example, R.E.P.O., has enjoyed similar success with a $10 price point, becoming one of Steam's top-grossing games last year. It remains to be seen how much FuzzyBot will charge for its upcoming co-op game, We Gotta Go.

In any case, indie game pricing on Steam has trended slightly downward since at least 2023. Recent analysis from GameDiscoverCo suggests that small developers have settled on a $20 price limit, while AAA games have gradually shifted from $60 to $70.

This has created a gap between $20 and $60 that, while sparse, is not completely abandoned. The developers of Arc Raiders, one of 2025's most successful titles, admitted that the co-op shooter's $40 price point was inspired by Helldivers II, which is Sony's top-selling PC game by far.

Permalink to story:

Why $7.99 has become the sweet spot for indie games on Steam

 

[ScottSoapbox]

There have been years of research on this in the field of Marketing so maybe look into that rather than theorizing with a buddy...

And $2 does not feel free. There are currently 38 games on my gg.deals wishlist on sale for less than $2, 8 for less than $1. (notice me not pushing the buy button)

 

[Lowhangingfruit]

Video games are kind of like tshirts. Why do some tshirts cost $5 and some $100? Is it the brand? The latest trend? What pushes you to buy a shirt even though have 50 shirts you never wear?

So I'd say the price of a game has less to do with economics and more about "how curious am I about this"? or "how much do I want to support this developer".

 

[m4a4]

There have been years of research on this in the field of Marketing so maybe look into that rather than theorizing with a buddy...

And $2 does not feel free. There are currently 38 games on my gg.deals wishlist on sale for less than $2, 8 for less than $1. (notice me not pushing the buy button)

Let's be honest, if you actually wanted to play those games, you'd have pulled the trigger. A cup of coffee for a game you want to play? That's a deal to most gamers.

I can also see $8 being the sweet spot, and that they reasoned it out as above. At the end of the day it will be desirability vs price. And they've managed to become successful in part/spite of their price lol

 

[Fimbulvetr]

I'm not sure what planet they're from , but here on Earth, $3 is $3, $2 is $2 (not free), and wonder of wonders, $4, $5 and $6 are NOT the same. . That being said, I commend them for trying to keep it affordable.

 

[Alpine7995]

The real magic is that $7.99 sits perfectly in the “impulse buy, no refund guilt” zone. Expensive enough to feel real, cheap enough that you won’t open a spreadsheet to justify it.

 

[ScottSoapbox]

Let's be honest, if you actually wanted to play those games, you'd have pulled the trigger. A cup of coffee for a game you want to play? That's a deal to most gamers.

Let's be honest, if those games prices reflected my current value of them -which include my available time to play them-, I'd have pulled the trigger.

I currently have 825 games in my steam library of which 554 are unplayed.

I added 7 new games in the post Christmas sale that I am excited about and have started playing 3.

To play any game, I'm choosing it over hundreds of other games.
I have limited time to play games with my main career, family, friends, motorcycles, and starting another business.
I also have watched PC games prices long enough to know the next sale is around the corner and no longer buy things before I have a reasonable chance of playing them.

But if they are free, why not? But $2 isn't free.

 

[m4a4]

Let's be honest, if those games prices reflected my current value of them -which include my available time to play them-, I'd have pulled the trigger.

I currently have 825 games in my steam library of which 554 are unplayed.

I added 7 new games in the post Christmas sale that I am excited about and have started playing 3.

To play any game, I'm choosing it over hundreds of other games.
I have limited time to play games with my main career, family, friends, motorcycles, and starting another business.
I also have watch PC games prices long enough to know the next sale is around the corner and no longer buy things before I have a reasonable chance of playing them.

But if they are free, why not? But $2 isn't free.

I mean, you just proved my point; you don't actually want to play them (at least, not right now). Even free, there are some games I wouldn't get because I'd never play them.

But a game under $2 that I want to play? Easiest decision of my life. It does feel essentially free.

 

[ScottSoapbox]

Video games are kind of like tshirts. Why do some tshirts cost $5 and some $100? Is it the brand? The latest trend? What pushes you to buy a shirt even though have 50 shirts you never wear?

So I'd say the price of a game has less to do with economics and more about "how curious am I about this"? or "how much do I want to support this developer".

The price has EVERYTHING to do with economics.

Every purchase is an evaluation of the current price vs the current in that moment value to you.

You can value the warm feeling of supporting indie devs, the game play, the hottie on the cover art, the prestige of the ultra deluxe pre-purchase skins, the fact that it isn't an EA title, or whatever, in any combination.

You may only buy it because you are currently drunk or You may barely value it more than the price and grumble about how it expensive it is while still buying it.

But the value is worth the price is the fundamental truth in all (voluntary) purchases.

 

[ScottSoapbox]

I mean, you just proved my point; you don't actually want to play them (at least, not right now). Even free, there are some games I wouldn't get because I'd never play them.

But a game under $2 that I want to play? Easiest decision of my life. It does feel essentially free.

But I DO want to play them. That's why they are on my wishlist.

You don't get to add "not right now" and say it means the same thing because it doesn't.

I too, do not get free games I don't want.

 

[BobHome]

I do not agree. I guess that means I am not an 'average consumer'.

 

[m4a4]

But I DO want to play them. That's why they are on my wishlist.

You don't get to add "not right now" and say it means the same thing because it doesn't.

I too, do not get free games I don't want.

No you don't, or you wouldn't squabble over a dollar or 2. You don't want to play them, hence why no price is good enough (save literally free, which still might be too much effort lol).

And the "not right now" was me being generous to you. My mistake for painting you as someone not incredibly cheap.

A lot of gamers have games on their wishlist where they like the idea of playing it, but probably won't bother to buy, even if it goes down to 1 cent. A wishlisting doesn't guarantee a sale...
I currently have at least 1 free game wishlisted as a "maybe later" as I don't want to play it right now

But whatever, you can't be honest here, I do not care anymore.

 

[ScottSoapbox]

No you don't, or you wouldn't squabble over a dollar or 2. You don't want to play them, hence why no price is good enough (save literally free, which still might be too much effort lol).

And the "not right now" was me being generous to you. My mistake for painting you as someone not incredibly cheap.

A lot of gamers have games on their wishlist where they like the idea of playing it, but probably won't bother to buy, even if it goes down to 1 cent. A wishlisting doesn't guarantee a sale...
I currently have at least 1 free game wishlisted as a "maybe later" as I don't want to play it right now

But whatever, you can't be honest here, I do not care anymore.

I don't see why this is so difficult to understand.

I bought 14 games since Black Friday including Baldur's Gate 3 and Split Fiction (25% off), Ratchet & Clank and No Man's Sky (~75% off), Hogwarts Legacy and Dark Forces Remasters (95+% off).

How much free time do you think I have?

Currently <$2 on my wishlist
Cats Quest 3. I enjoyed 1, but I haven't played 2 yet which I own.
Dusk. Supposed to be a great boomer shooter, but I'm still playing through Ion Fury.
Ultros. Supposed to be a great metroidvania, but I'm still playing Dead Cells

Obviously, I wanted the games I bought more than those I didn't. But my wants change. I routinely want something different and snag a deal and play it for a day and forget about it. Other times it turns out to be good (Death's Door) and I finish it then go back to my other games I'm working through.

Also, it doesn't make you cheap if you don't buy everything you want. It makes you a rational non-billionaire.