Windows 10 will start automatically removing problem-causing updates

midian182

Posts: 6,564   +58
Staff member

As spotted by Windows Latest, Microsoft recently published a support document that answers “Why were recently installed updates removed?” The company writes that these updates and patches "keep your device secure and running at peak efficiency,” but they occasionally run into incompatibility issues.

If a PC fails to start following a Windows 10 update and reboot, users may see a notification that reads: "We removed some recently installed updates to recover your device from a startup failure." Microsoft says this only happens when all other automatic recovery attempts have been unsuccessful.

Once an update has been removed, Windows 10 will prevent it from installing automatically for the next 30 days, giving Microsoft and its partners time to investigate and hopefully fix any issues.

Users can manually reinstall any updates that were uninstalled, but they will be removed again if Windows 10 still doesn't start.

Microsoft said that all editions of Windows 10 will receive the feature.

Last week, it was discovered that Microsoft’s latest cumulative update had caused performance issues with games and mice. Sadly, it seems Windows 10 won’t be automatically uninstalling updates in these cases, that only happens when a system fails to start.

Despite its problems over the years, Windows 10 passed 800 million installs recently and is expected to reach the long-awaited one billion milestone later this year.

Image credit: charnsitr via Shutterstock

Permalink to story.

 

wiyosaya

Posts: 5,718   +3,927
:facepalm:

So what happens if automatically removing the problem update causes even more problems?

Though manually removing problem updates is a real pain, if you ask me, this is avoiding the real problem and that is quality assurance testing before pushing the update to everyone.

I do not trust the "AI" behind this to always make the right decisions.

In effect, it seems like anyone using Windohs 10 has become an M$ beta tester.
 
Last edited:
I

iamcts

:facepalm:

So what happens if automatically removing the problem update causes even more problems?

Though manually removing problem updates is a real pain, if you ask me, this is avoiding the real problem and that is quality assurance testing before pushing the update to everyone.

I do not trust the "AI" behind this to always make the right decisions.

In effect, it seems like anyone using Windohs 10 has become an M$ beta tester.

There is a reason Microsoft got rid of its QA department. The users are now the QA department.
 

Mr Majestyk

Posts: 635   +556
:facepalm:

So what happens if automatically removing the problem update causes even more problems?

Though manually removing problem updates is a real pain, if you ask me, this is avoiding the real problem and that is quality assurance testing before pushing the update to everyone.

I do not trust the "AI" behind this to always make the right decisions.

In effect, it seems like anyone using Windohs 10 has become an M$ beta tester.

There is a reason Microsoft got rid of its QA department. The users are now the QA department.

Just like game companies releasing unfinished crap to get it oiut the door then forcing you to buy DLC’s that fix the issues. Brilliant.
 

Cycloid Torus

Posts: 4,713   +1,517
I think I would rather have it than not. The joys of having a brick, I can do without. Hopefully, it will leave tracks - possibly in Reliability History - which can be used to further understand what broke. Just bouncing the system like a dribbling a basketball would not be helpful.
 

Humza

Posts: 815   +161
Staff member
Pretty sure they need an "iOS 12" like update for Windows that prioritizes performance, optimization and improves overall quality instead of adding new features in betas that cater to narrow user bases.