X says China used hundreds of bot accounts to amplify fears about AI data centers that many Americans already share

midian182

Posts: 11,861   +181
Staff member
A hot potato: X says that it has just identified a bot farm of approximately 200,000 accounts created by Chinese operators. What's getting a lot of attention is that 200 of these accounts were apparently dedicated to posting anti-AI data center content designed to influence public perception. The country has tried this before with little success – most people already hate the facilities, anyway.

X's Global Government Affairs writes that the 200 accounts were posting "in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy."

The posts contained "claims" that AI data centers are driving up household electricity prices and straining the grid. Other posts featured AI-generated cartoons that depicted data-center operators enriching themselves at the public's expense.

At least two of the example images appeared in a similar OpenAI report from June. It claimed that China-based ChatGPT users asked the chatbot for ways to influence Americans' opinions of data centers in the US. The resulting posts also claimed that AI data center buildouts for AI were increasing electricity prices for average families.

When discussing rising electricity prices, the OpenAI report said the accounts "claimed" this was the case. But it really is happening, as noted by Bloomberg, which found that prices have risen by up to 267% in areas near data centers.

Goldman Sachs came to a similar conclusion. It wrote that electricity prices have already increased by 6.9% year-over-year as of February 2026, and they'll continue to increase as more AI data centers are built.

X didn't say what the remaining 198,800 accounts were posting. OpenAI's June report said the other main content criticized US tariffs and technology policies, so one could assume the same thing was happening here.

The pushback against data centers in the US has been growing in both size and intensity. It's led to claims that the opposition hurts the economy and national security. Fox News compared it to protesting against tank and plane factories during World War II. Even President Donald Trump said those opposing the construction of new data centers are "making a mistake."

Ultimately, it feels like China is wasting its time trying to convince people of something they already believe. The facilities consume enormous amounts of electricity and can strain power grids that were never designed for such concentrated demand. One planned Michigan campus is expected to draw 1.4 gigawatts – roughly the output of a nuclear power plant – while residents have also raised concerns about traffic and the loss of agricultural land.

Water use is another major concern. Virginia data centers consumed at least 1.85 billion gallons in 2023, up from 1.13 billion gallons in 2019. In Georgia, one development used 29 million gallons of water before receiving a bill while nearby residents complained about low water pressure.

The expansion can also bring constant noise and more pollution, especially as operators turn to diesel generators and gas turbines when the grid cannot keep up. China may be exploiting the controversy, but it certainly didn't invent it.

Permalink to story:

 
These are the dangers of living in a free society, just like wealth is a consequence of capitalism. But don’t worry, socialism will fix all these terrible problems. We’re half-way there….
 
X...the platform whose owner would benefit the most from data centers to keep growing is reporting that China is propagating A.I fears?

As long as X remains owned by Elon Musk I wouldn't trust anything from that platform to begin with.
 
Last edited:
You X...the platform whose owner would benefit the most from data centers to keep growing is reporting that China is propagating A.I fears?

As long as X remains owned by Elon Musk I wouldn't trust anything from that platform to begin with.
Or you could research data centers and realize that if China takes the lead, the US will no longer be the premier super power?

 
You MIGHT be able to say most Democrats hate AI data centers (56% strongly oppose data centers), but most Americans simply oppose data centers (not hate): https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx

So that premise of the article is wrong. The author is injecting his personal opinion into the article (that "most people" have an emotional "hatred") that likely represents a view of people around him. And the fact that China is ensuring Americans stay opposed to AI data centers is telling of China's motives. But the article didn't seem to go into that obvious facet at all.
 
Last edited:
Or you could research data centers and realize that if China takes the lead, the US will no longer be the premier super power?

The only way that statement makes sense is in the context of China using AI to massively hack systems around the clock, which it will. In that case we'll need to match them in AI capability just to defend against their hacking. This is why I always say AI is the new WMD.
 
Or you could research data centers and realize that if China takes the lead, the US will no longer be the premier super power?
Or perhaps you need to realize that Elon Musk is trying to play down China's message since it's no secret No middle class U.S citizen wants anymore data centers on their neighborhoods.
 
The only way that statement makes sense is in the context of China using AI to massively hack systems around the clock, which it will. In that case we'll need to match them in AI capability just to defend against their hacking. This is why I always say AI is the new WMD.
It makes sense ECONOMICALLY as they will drive the economy in the near future (one can argue they're already driving it now)...

Military is also a concern - but economics generally always comes first...
 
Or perhaps you need to realize that Elon Musk is trying to play down China's message since it's no secret No middle class U.S citizen wants anymore data centers on their neighborhoods.
That's actually a very misleading statement... try a little more research... while no one wants ANY large factory/datacentre/powerplant near their own house, most knowledgeable people acknowledge that these things ARE essential.

Unfortunately, since they have to be built SOMEWHERE, there will always be unhappy people - and since the US is a democracy, you'll see politicians pretending to hate these things in order to keep votes... but in the end, they DO get built and politicians DO get re-elected...
 
That's actually a very misleading statement... try a little more research... while no one wants ANY large factory/datacentre/powerplant near their own house, most knowledgeable people acknowledge that these things ARE essential.

Unfortunately, since they have to be built SOMEWHERE, there will always be unhappy people - and since the US is a democracy, you'll see politicians pretending to hate these things in order to keep votes... but in the end, they DO get built and politicians DO get re-elected...
Misleading?
If it was misleading you wouldn't have millions of americans right now protesting about the data centers. I wonder if Elon Musk would live day and night right next to one of those loud monstrosities devaluing his mansion....the answer would be "no"
 
Last edited:
Misleading?
If it was misleading you wouldn't have millions of americans right now protesting about the data centers. I wonder if Elon Musk would live and night right next to one of those loud monstrosities devaluing his mansion....the answer would be "no"
Actually... it would... it's one of the flaws in a democracy... people are free to say what they want - and since most people aren't very bright - they tend to believe stuff they shouldn't...

Millions of people supported Hitler too you know...

Again, we have a great tool in the internet (and AI that allows you to use it really efficiently)... why don't you try using it to fact-check the nonsense you're spouting?

Don't get me wrong, however - democracy may be flawed, but it's still the best system we've come up with so far... I'll take living in North America over China any day of the week...
 
Political leanings aside, I do believe that as a taxpayer and a homeowner, that AI data center concerns are valid. It doesn't take a foreign entity to magnify my electricity bill increasing 40% in a year while I am using the same amount of electricity for the last 4 years+.
 
So instead of boiling everything down into a simple statement like "not in my back yard" argument, why don't we look at WHY people hate datacenters
-lower your home value
-increased air pollution
-increased electricity and water costs
-massive spikes in consumer goods because the datacenters are eating up all the resources

People don't hate datacenters just because datacenters=bad. People hate datacenters because it means an increased cost of living and lower quality of life when most people are already struggling to pay their bills.

If a datacenter gets built near my house and it looses 100k in value the state isn't suddenly going to come in and lower my taxes. Meanwhile, most of these datacenters pay zero in taxes through a combination of tax incentives and through financing because you can't tax debt.

So, fine, now we know why people hate centers and that means we know what to fix to make people stop hating them. Much of the datacenter hate comes from the people who want to build them are unwilling to do what it takes to make people stop hating living near them.
 
Last edited:
You MIGHT be able to say most Democrats hate AI data centers (56% strongly oppose data centers), but most Americans simply oppose data centers (not hate): https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx

So that premise of the article is wrong. The author is injecting his personal opinion into the article (that "most people" have an emotional "hatred") that likely represents a view of people around him. And the fact that China is ensuring Americans stay opposed to AI data centers is telling of China's motives. But the article didn't seem to go into that obvious facet at all.
IMO, the X account brought this "issue" to the public forefront. Doing so, is an effort to discredit the information presented and aligns with a one potentially political viewpoint. Therefore, as much as the title of the account would like to present itself as a "defender of free speech" the account is speaking out against the free speech of the bot farm and is invalidating the viewpoint presented, which, IMO, is hypocritical.

Then there is the problem that the owner of the platform has a monetary interest in the monetary success of AI and any data center or centers that are required for the implementation of AI.

Then there is the problem that opposition to Data Centers is an apolitical issue. Take, for example, the opposition to data centers in New York State and Texas - two states which could not be any more politically opposite to each other.

The author of the article is exercising their 1st Amendment Rights. Are you against 1st Amendment rights?
Or you could research data centers and realize that if China takes the lead, the US will no longer be the premier super power?
IMO, it will take much more than some other country taking the lead on AI to knock the US off its "Super Power Throne". Are you aware that Microsoft's terms for use of CoPilot include that it is intended for "entertainment purposes only" ?
 
IMO, it will take much more than some other country taking the lead on AI to knock the US off its "Super Power Throne". Are you aware that Microsoft's terms for use of CoPilot include that it is intended for "entertainment purposes only" ?
If AI becomes the next "big thing" (which most of the elite believe), then NOT being at the forefront would doom the US into relying on China... and that would eventually end their reign as the premier superpower - which many would argue will happen anyways simply due to China's vast population advantage...

People can put whatever statements they want out about AI - it's a free country - but there are entire fields that are becoming (or have already become) reliant on AI and this will only continue into the future. Fortunately, those who make the decisions in the US seem to realize this and while they pay lip-service to "anti-AI" propaganda, they are still going ahead with it.

Political leanings aside, I do believe that as a taxpayer and a homeowner, that AI data center concerns are valid. It doesn't take a foreign entity to magnify my electricity bill increasing 40% in a year while I am using the same amount of electricity for the last 4 years+.
In general, people tend to be lazy, selfish/greedy and stupid... Those who aren't lazy tend to use this to exploit those who are... pretty much every system in the world rewards selfishness/greed - provided you don't APPEAR too selfish/greedy. It doesn't reward Lazy - which, fortunately, is the one trait you can actually improve on.

FACT CHECK!!! It's really not that hard to do nowadays... but alas, so many are too lazy to do it... Nowadays, in order to build a datacenter, a company needs to provide a plan for providing electricity - utility bills of the locals DON'T go up any more - but people read one article from years ago and assume that it's true without FACT CHECKING!!
 
Back