5G wireless pricing could be tiered like fixed line says AT&T CEO

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,179   +1,427
Staff member
In context: We still have some time before 5G really becomes a thing. The major carriers only have it deployed in a handful of cities so far. However, that doesn’t make it too early to talk about pricing, and AT&T dropped a bomb for customers thinking they would be getting faster speeds on their same plan.

During an earnings call, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson was asked if the company was planning to hike rates for the faster download speeds that 5G would provide. His quick answer was "Yes." However, he also entertained the thought of a cable-industry-like pricing structure.

“I will be very surprised if, as we move into wireless, the pricing regime in wireless doesn’t look something like the pricing regime you see in fixed line. If you can offer a gig speed — because there are some customers that are willing to pay a premium for 500 meg to 1 gig speed and so forth. And so I expect that to be the case. We’re 2 or 3 years away from seeing that play out.”

So Stephenson’s visions is a multi-tiered system where customers have to choose between 5G performance caps. This pricing scheme is counter to T-Mobile’s outlook.

Back in February, T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray said that the company was not planning on hiking rates or coming up with convoluted pricing tiers — at least not at first.

“5G service plans will be unlimited, and they won't be more expensive than T-Mobile's existing 4G service plans, at least for three years,” said the exec.

Ars Technica notes Verizon charges $10 more for 5G compared to 4G, but that is for the full 5G bandwidth. It has not mentioned anything about tiering it out, but that does not take it off the table.

It is still too early to tell where carriers will go with pricing once 5G is fully implemented. Right now even the number of devices capable of the new standard is limited. One thing is clear: 5G is going to change the game. We’ll have to see how Big Telecom settles on pricing and service.

Permalink to story.

 
If AT&T does something similar to what they have with their gig service with fiber being a reasonable $90/month in many markets with no data caps then that would be amiable to me, but if they do something stupid like charge $150+ just because it is "mobile" and/or leverages a data cap then it will be highway robbery which needs to be stopped at all costs. The only reason why I am still on VZW is because of the footprint and reliability. Their asinine look at data caps with their pathetic reasoning about their "backbone being stressed" makes me want to jump ship faster that you can blink, but who would I go to? No way in hell I am going to AT&T anyway for mobile as they are just as dirty normally as VZW. Nobody else has the footprint.
 
"...no plans to increase the price..." Yeah, unless it takes off, then we can DUMP fiber/cable and jack the price up as there will be no other option.
 
"...no plans to increase the price..." Yeah, unless it takes off, then we can DUMP fiber/cable and jack the price up as there will be no other option.
We will never dump fiber. 5g antennas have to be relatively close together, there will have to basically be one on every block because of how short range it is. A fiber line will probably still just have to be run from the street to your house. Also, commercial fiber internet will never go away.
 
Also, commercial fiber internet will never go away.
I agree. I am signed up to get fiber when the company running the fiber in our area gets enough orders in our neighborhood. I will not go to a wireless solution from fiber once I have it, and it almost certainly will beat 5G to my neighborhood.
 
Back