AI browsers are about to eat the internet

Bob O'Donnell

Posts: 136   +2
Staff member

OK, I'll admit it: I was a skeptic at first.

After all, some of the early iterations of AI browsers basically took the Chromium engine, added a slightly modified UI, and replaced the traditional search bar on the home page with a chatbot prompt. Not exactly revolutionary.

Over time, however, it's becoming clear that AI browsers have the potential to do significantly more. In fact, I think they could be the trigger that finally makes on-device AI meaningful and impactful for a huge range of consumer and business users. Beyond that, they could serve as a critical cog in driving distributed, hybrid AI architectures and applications.

What I didn't initially consider is that AI browsers are much more than just another application – they're essentially becoming platforms upon which a whole range of other applications and services can run. Admittedly, the idea of a browser as a platform isn't new, and the concept of websites or collections of HTML pages functioning as standalone applications has been around for a long time.

What's different now, however, is that we're starting to see more distributed applications – where certain elements run in one environment and other elements run in another – coming to the fore. While this isn't necessarily because of the rise of cloud-based, AI-powered applications, there certainly seems to be a strong correlation. Initially, of course, much of this was due to the fact that the core LLMs driving AI applications like chatbots were only available in enormous, cloud-based datacenters. The terminal-like interface of chatbot prompts acted as a simple way to interact directly with those large models.

With the development and proliferation of Model Context Protocol (MCP), however, it became possible to treat AI models less like monolithic endpoints and more like interoperable resources that can be accessed across different environments. In other words, MCP enables coordination – allowing an application to dynamically engage multiple models, potentially running in different locations, as part of a single workflow.

This concept becomes even more powerful when applied to mixture-of-experts (MoE) models and the intelligent, real-time "chunking" of requests into smaller tasks that can be routed to specialized models. Critically, this raises an important architectural question: where should the intelligence that performs this routing actually live?

Placing that decision-making logic close to the user – rather than deep inside a cloud service – creates opportunities to take advantage of local context, available device resources, and even enterprise infrastructure that may be invisible to a purely cloud-based application.

Inherent in this type of architecture is the need for an orchestration engine – something that can determine how to break a problem into smaller workloads and decide where each should be executed. This is the point at which AI browsers begin to look far more consequential than they first appear.

Imagine if that orchestration engine were embedded directly into the browser – an application that already sits at the intersection of user intent, data access, identity, and device resources. Put another way, browsers are uniquely positioned to become AI orchestration platforms because they are ubiquitous, frequently updated, already trusted with identity, data, and permissions, and inherently cross-platform.

To complete the picture, there are two other critical elements to consider. First, all of the AI browsers are being built by companies that have their own frontier AI models and have also created – or are at least working on – smaller versions of these models optimized to run directly on devices.

By embedding these device-specific Small Language Models (SLMs) into their browsers, they could customize the orchestration agent to intelligently understand what resources are available within their range of frontier models, enabling the most efficient use of computing power. In addition, because browsers are updated so frequently, this provides an easy mechanism for vendors to keep these local models up to date.

The real game-changer for AI browsers is their ability to serve as the hub from which AI agents are run and controlled. Everyone, it seems, is expecting agentic AI to completely rewrite the rules on how we perform tasks, get information, and interact with our devices. Exactly how (and where) those interactions will occur hasn't been entirely clear – until now.

While operating system vendors will undoubtedly try to claim this orchestration layer for themselves, the browser's agility and cross-platform consistency make it a more practical execution engine for these tasks.

The second and final critical element is that modern PCs and smartphones are now much better equipped to run these local models, thanks to the integration of more powerful CPUs, GPUs, and a brand-new class of NPUs. Hardware support is essential to making a distributed hybrid AI architecture possible, and the installed base of these devices is starting to hit critical mass.

So, if you put all these different pieces together, you can start to imagine a number of intriguing possibilities with very important implications. First, the ability to have an orchestration agent run locally on a device and determine, for example, what elements of a query it could answer using its own local models – and what elements need to be sent to other environments – could greatly improve computing efficiency and drive a significant reduction in power consumption. Instead of sending everything to the cloud, workloads could leverage all the compute resources available to them.

Oh, and by the way, the resources to which these workload components could be sent also include enterprise data centers equipped with AI infrastructure, not just the cloud. Organizations creating custom applications for their own purposes are likely to want to tap into those enterprise AI factory resources for access to proprietary or fine-tuned models.

Plus, as we enter an era where serious questions about the power grid's ability to support all the expected AI traffic are rising rapidly, the ability to leverage local datacenters and the computing horsepower of personal devices is going to make a big difference. The desire for greater control and guarantees (not just over power, but also over compute availability) is undoubtedly going to become more important as we move deeper into the AI computing era.

In addition to compute efficiency and power savings, the privacy and security benefits of initiating AI workloads on device and being able to tap into local data opens up a huge range of opportunities for customization and personalization.

Finally, the real game-changer for AI browsers is their ability to serve as the hub from which AI agents are run and controlled. Everyone, it seems, is expecting agentic AI to completely rewrite the rules on how we perform tasks, get information, and interact with our devices. Exactly how (and where) those interactions will occur hasn't been entirely clear – until now.

Just this week, Google announced important extensions to its Chrome browser that not only allow Gemini to run in a sidebar, but to run agentic applications that tap into local resources. This concept of driving agentic AI through the browser hearkens back to my earlier point: AI browsers are becoming the platform upon which more and more of our actual work gets done.

To be clear, there are bound to be several security-related challenges when it comes to running agents on personal devices, and I expect a number of hiccups along the way. In addition, while many of these arguments about AI browsers and agentic applications sound good in theory, the reality is that transitions like this tend to take longer than many initially expect, so don't hold your breath.

Ultimately, however, the idea of leveraging a familiar application like a browser in a smarter way seems like the most logical means of integrating AI and agents into our everyday workflows and onto our devices. While, like others, I originally thought AI-powered features in office productivity and creative applications were the key to driving on-device AI experiences, I'm increasingly convinced there is a new path forward, and AI browsers are the way to get there.

Bob O'Donnell is the founder and chief analyst of TECHnalysis Research, LLC a technology consulting firm that provides strategic consulting and market research services to the technology industry and professional financial community. You can follow him on Twitter

Permalink to story:

 
The problem is AI hallucinations and you really have to be paying attention to what your AI is doing to notice those hallucinations sometimes. If I have to verify everything my AI is doing I would rather do most of it myself. And can we please stop calling LLMs, AI. I use Claude for rapid prototyping and automating some things, but often times I have go over what Claude did and occasionally, Claude just spits out something completely useless. That's an LLM, I can't imagine how bad a SLM would be.

Until we can solve the hallucination problem then LLMs are useless in professional environments. They can make summarizing search results okay, but I still recommend people doing their own research and verifying the sources
 
Last edited:
"Agentic" AI will be a boon when it works well enough. The current iterations are basically tech demos that companies hope people use enough to gather data on how to make them better.

I watched ChatGPT's AI browser shop Amazon for someone and it got stuck for multiple minutes after scrolling too far on a large quantity dropdown box. GPUs cranking away at how to scroll back up. It also added an unrelated item to the cart so it was good the demoer wisely had disconnected all of his credit cards before turning over his login to the AI agent.

The dream is for AI agents to do a lot for you, but for now browsers presents a known space to work in that companies can repeatedly test at any time (visiting websites vs say calling restaurants). Only time will tell if more (usage) data can improve the agents enough to be useful in the near term.
 
All I could understand from this nonsense is that google is now pulling our ”local resources” to train it’s AI, I assume they mean personal photos, files etc. Could also just mean local hardware, but I’m kind of pessimistic with these things.

Also not a single real world use case. But yeah, I get the feeling someone paid to get this piece here.
 
The limited excitement I have for local browser AI is that ideally it would be a lot less lazy. What I mean is if you're using the current easily available consumer models it's pretty clear they are programmed to use a minimum amount of effort for web search type problems. If I ask them to find a niche product that can ship to my location and with a couple other constraints they'll look at maybe a few websites and then give up. Or if I ask it to search IMDB to find a very specific set of constraints it may search all of a couple dozen records there.

So hopefully a local AI browser running on my hardware would spend all day scraping the information I want it to if that's what I tell it to do. But I doubt they'll make it that simple.
 
This entire article is merely a non-poetic ode to 3-letter buzzwords with no content, no purpose, and no point. There is no AI here at all. It's just more glorified search-engine nonsense, as usual.

The mythical creature cannot be born of dogmatic propaganda.
 
Not gonna happen. For two reasons.
1. AIs still hallucinate, and will always hallucinate (at least as long as they're based on LLMs). This makes them inherently unreliable, and unfit for any purpose that involves spending, use of actually valuable resources, etc.
2. Even if AI agents would "eat the internet", the internet simply would cease to exists as we know it today. Once you take the incentive away from creating content, people will stop creating content. Valuable, human content, that is. And AI generated content will only get AIs closer to model collapse.

The only question remaining is: Will society and politicians "kill" (regulate, very strictly) AI before it kills society and the internet, or will AI kill society and the internet first, and die only then as a result of that?

I'd like to hope for the first, but knowing how stupid people and politicians are, it's most likely that it's the latter scenario that will play out.
 
All I could understand from this nonsense is that google is now pulling our ”local resources” to train it’s AI, I assume they mean personal photos, files etc. Could also just mean local hardware, but I’m kind of pessimistic with these things.

Also not a single real world use case. But yeah, I get the feeling someone paid to get this piece here.
Your last sentence. Agreed, I got that feeling too before reading any comments.

Well said.
 
"... integrating AI and agents into our everyday workflows and onto our devices."

What if my workflow is visiting the bathroom? Is Google going to wipe my butt, dry my urinary conduit, upload the result to the cloud?

Honestly, this AI nonsense is getting entirely 'out of hand'.

 
The browser internet is already dying. Generation Z already gets their news from Tik Tok, Snapchat and if they're "really educated" - They watch some Youtube.

Soon media outlets will have to cut their articles down to 5-10 second snippets to even reach an audience at all - All while battling algorithms that would prevent them from showing on the Generation Z feed
 
Back