Amnesty International slammed for using AI-generated images of real Colombia protests

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
A hot potato: In news that really illustrates the age we're living in, Amnesty International has been criticized for posting AI-generated images of human rights abuses that took place during the 2021 protests in Colombia.

To commemorate the 2nd anniversary of the protests against tax rises imposed by the Colombian government during the height of Covid-19, the international human rights advocacy group posted images on Twitter of incidents that appear to have taken place at the time, including one of the Colombian police leading away a protestor that was captioned, "Why the Colombian police need comprehensive reform."

But the image contains plenty of tell-tale signs that an AI created it, the most obvious being the people's faces, which have the strange, distorted look that AIs tend to spit out. The Guardian notes that the Colombian flag carried by the protestor has the colors in the wrong order, too, and the police uniform is outdated.

Amnesty did include text in the tweet stating that an AI generated the images. The organization said that while it had used actual photographs of the protests in previous reports, it chose to use AI-generated images in this instance to protect the protestors' identities. A spokesperson said some of the protestors were still being targeted for prosecution by Colombian authorities over their involvement.

"The intention was for this artwork to serve as a symbolic example that highlights the fear that many of the victims still feel about publicly denouncing the repression they suffered," said the spokesperson.

Despite the good intentions behind the post, and the included note stating that a machine created them, Amnesty International has removed the images as it doesn't "want the criticism for the use of AI-generated images to distract from the core message in support of the victims and their calls for justice in Colombia," said Erika Guevara Rosas, director for Americas at Amnesty. "But we do take the criticism seriously and want to continue the engagement to ensure we understand better the implications and our role to address the ethical dilemmas posed by the use of such technology."

Juancho Torres, a photojournalist based in Bogotá, said the use of the AI images in this way was an insult to all photojournalists who put themselves in danger to cover protests.

Using AI-generated images remains controversial, even when companies don't try to hide it. Prime Matter, the publisher behind the upcoming System Shock remake, received a slew of criticism for using Midjourney to create an image of game antagonist Shodan in a tweet. Many responses complained that using an AI to generate an image takes jobs away from real artists, and most of what is generated is plagiarized from others' work.

Permalink to story.

 
Some news organizations actually use sets and props sometimes to make their pictures. I believe CNN was caught doing this a couple of times. Now with AI what is going to happen? Even more tools to push a narrative that just is not true. Another tool of the fake news machines.
 
Some news organizations actually use sets and props sometimes to make their pictures. I believe CNN was caught doing this a couple of times. Now with AI what is going to happen? Even more tools to push a narrative that just is not true. Another tool of the fake news machines.

CNN has been caught doing this a number of times using blue/green screen or just outright acting for the camera. There's a reason they're rightfully called "fake news".
 
CNN has been caught doing this a number of times using blue/green screen or just outright acting for the camera. There's a reason they're rightfully called "fake news".
ABC says 'hold my beer'.

 
ABC says 'hold my beer'.

Meanwhile Fox News says hold my keg... Seattle, Capitol Hill, Jan 6 to name a few. But as a long time donor to Amnesty Intl, I think it was a bad idea. Real images should be doing the talking.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile Fox News says hold my keg... Seattle, Capitol Hill, Jan 6 to name a few. But as a long time donor to Amnesty Intl, I think it was a bad idea. Real images should be doing the talking.
I don't see Fox news manufacturing reports and supposedly on-scene reporting using movie magic.
 
Meanwhile Fox News says hold my keg... Seattle, Capitol Hill, Jan 6 to name a few. But as a long time donor to Amnesty Intl, I think it was a bad idea. Real images should be doing the talking.
You mean CHAZ or CHOP as they called it were the kid was murdered after the police weren't allowed inside their 'zone'? Ya the videos left receipts on that escapade.
 
The more I read about how these organizations such as Amnesty or Red Cross operate these days, the more I feel like their only purpose is to collect money and thrive on corruption.
 
I don't see Fox news manufacturing reports and supposedly on-scene reporting using movie magic.
Oh they do :)
Like the trend they started a long time ago with using photoshoped pictures for ppl they didn't "like" to make them look "unflattering" (aka they made them significantly more ugly)

As for more serious stuff, here's something from wiki:

In June 2020, Fox News' website published digitally altered photographs of Seattle's Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone to include a man armed with an assault rifle from earlier Seattle protests; also added to the photographs were smashed windows from other parts of Seattle. In a separate incident, the Fox News website ran articles about protests in Seattle, with accompanying photos of a burning city actually being from Saint Paul, Minnesota, the previous month.[98] Although the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone was peacefully occupied, "Fox's coverage contributed to the appearance of armed unrest", stated The Washington Post. The manipulated and wrongly used images were removed, with Fox News stating that it "regrets these errors".[99]

In July 2020, Fox News aired a photo that edited out then-president Donald Trump from a photo where he was seen posing with Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago which was shown during a segment about Maxwell's arrest at the time.[100] Fox News later apologized for the edit, claiming it was a mistake.

On November 12, 2021, Fox News edited a video of President Joe Biden to remove context from remarks that some could judge as racially insensitive, which was shown on Fox & Friends.

There are many other older examples.
 
Last edited:
There's one flaw in all these non-profits that always seems to fly under the radar. There are people making their living off of the things. So as much as they say they'd like to eliminate what ever atrocities they are fighting, if they did they'd be out of a job. There's a strange symbiotic relationship and the non-profits need, hell have to have examples to quilt people into donating. So how much is actually real compared to exaggerated or outright fabricated to further this goal? Who knows. But no matter what Amnesty says their motivation was, I'm not surprised and expect to see the use of AI directed fabricated "proof" to increase in all areas, including non-profits.
 
There's one flaw in all these non-profits that always seems to fly under the radar. There are people making their living off of the things. So as much as they say they'd like to eliminate what ever atrocities they are fighting, if they did they'd be out of a job. There's a strange symbiotic relationship and the non-profits need, hell have to have examples to quilt people into donating. So how much is actually real compared to exaggerated or outright fabricated to further this goal? Who knows. But no matter what Amnesty says their motivation was, I'm not surprised and expect to see the use of AI directed fabricated "proof" to increase in all areas, including non-profits.
It's usually pretty transparent when you look at where the money is going. Most of these "non-profits" are not sinking most of their money into what they're combating. The last time I looked, Susan G. Komen was only spending ~22% of what it took in on cancer research. Most of the money was being spent on fundraising activities to keep the cash flowing in with administrative staff costs being next in line behind that.

Much of these charities are spending next to nothing on combating their chosen issue.
 
Why is everyone attacking CNN? I think their news are at least as truthful as the 1969 Moon landing.
 
Back