Apple will still charge a commission for iOS apps linked to external stores

[Alfonso Maruccia]

A hot potato: The legal dispute between Epic Games and Apple has reached a resolution, prompting Cupertino to take swift action following the recent ruling from the US Supreme Court. Developers are now allowed to offer a purchase option on external stores, but they are still required to pay a substantial fee to Apple.

In 2023, a court decision in the legal battle between Epic Games and Apple managed to disappoint both parties. Apple wasn't compelled to open iOS to third-party app stores, but it had to abandon its so-called "anti-steering policies" and inform users about external payment methods. Both Epic and Apple petitioned the US Supreme Court to reconsider the case, but the SCOTUS has now denied both requests.

The Epic v. Apple case took three years to conclude, yet Apple is still attempting to have the last word on the matter. The company has updated its App Store policies with new guidelines for apps that provide an external purchase link, reiterating that publishers and developers must still pay Cupertino to conduct business within the iOS ecosystem.

According to the guidelines, Apple will apply a 27 percent commission on sales derived from external purchase methods. If a payment is due, developers will receive an invoice based on their own transaction reporting. Developers interested in external purchase methods need to apply for an "entitlement" to enable them, and they still need to comply with iOS conventional payment methods in addition to the external ones.

For users attempting to use external payment methods, Apple has introduced a full-screen notice, which the company refers to as a "disclosure sheet." The screen essentially serves as a warning, stating that Apple is not responsible for the privacy and security of purchases made on the web or outside the official iOS App Store.

According to the guidelines, all App Store developers benefit from Apple's proprietary technology and tools protected by intellectual property laws, and they have access to Cupertino's extensive (and often affluent) user base. The 27 percent commission on external purchases is seemingly required to reimburse Apple for its investments in developer tools, SDKs, APIs, updates, and the "platform itself."

Epic's founder and CEO, Tim Sweeney, stated that Apple's latest move in the mobile app business is anticompetitive and criticized the "scare screen" shown to customers choosing external payment methods. Epic plans to contest Apple's "bad-faith compliance plan" in the District Court.

Permalink to story.

https://www.techspot.com/news/101547-apple-charge-commission-ios-apps-linked-external-stores.html

 

[m4a4]

I can't wait to see what Apple does when sideloading competing stores is "allowed".

 

[yRaz]

Android is trash but I don't understand what people see in apple. iOS really isn't any better than Android if you consider their scummy business practices. My next version of Android will problem be LineageOS, I'm tired of not owning my device.

 

[MasterAce]

Somehow it works for spotify and netflix, how do they get away with it? Epic should be able to copy whatever they do.

 

[Theinsanegamer]

I cant wait for the drones to show up and tell us how having this option will TOTALLY destroy the security of their Fruit-phones and how consumers need to have choice taken away from them for their own safety.

The EU didnt go far enough IMO.

 

[Kashim]

It's the Apple tax. Get over it. Apple will never stop fleecing devs and customers, they're experts at it. No matter how many lawsuits companies throw at them there will be no end to it. It's their bread and butter.

 

[Mr Majestyk]

Hopeless outcome that still leaves Apple largely in control and rolling in money.