Arkansas just passed an age-verification social media law with some confusing exemptions

midian182

Posts: 9,741   +121
Staff member
In brief: Arkansas has become the second state to pass a law requiring under-18s to get parental consent before they open an account on a social media platform. Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed the Social Media Safety Act into law, which goes into effect on September 1, but there's confusion over which companies will be affected.

The law requires social media companies that earn more than $100 million in annual revenue to work with third-party services to verify new account holders' personal information. This is done using "any commercially reasonable age verification method" or government-issued IDs such as photo IDs or driver's licenses. Current account holders won't be affected.

The law states that social media companies are defined as any online forum that lets users create public profiles and interact with each other through digital content.

CNN reports that in the final days of negotiations over the bill, Arkansas lawmakers approved an amendment that appears to exempt some of the world's biggest social media companies. Given all the concern over TikTok's influence and its links with China, it's surprising to see that social media platforms that permit users to "generate short video clips of dancing, voice overs, or other acts of entertainment in which the primary purpose is not educational or informative" are exempt. That would also seem to cover Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, as well as TikTok - but apparently not.

Sen. Tyler Dees, a lead co-sponsor of the legislation, said "The purpose of this bill was to empower parents and protect kids from social media platforms, like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat."

"We worked with stakeholders to ensure that email, text messaging, video streaming, and networking websites were not covered by the bill," Dees added.

Other exemptions include social media companies that "exclusively" offer subscription content, and those focused on "professional networking" and "career development" (I.e., LinkedIn). Companies that "exclusively offer" video gaming-focused social networking features aren't covered, either, which could include Twitch despite it not really being a social media platform.

Arkansas is following Utah in signing a social media law, though the latter's is a lot more extreme. Not only do under-18s need parental permission to create an account, but it also blocks them from using social media between 10:30 pm and 6:30 am by default (parents can change this). Moreover, companies are barred "from using a design or feature that causes a minor to have an addiction to the company's social media platform." Texas, Ohio, and Louisiana are considering similar social media bills.

The laws come at a time when the mental health impact of social media on younger users is well documented, and many countries are considering banning TikTok over its China ties. Despite this, the White House is preparing to give social media influencers their own briefing room as President Biden tries to appeal to younger voters.

Permalink to story.

 
If a child wants to create an account on TikTok for example, he needs a smartphone or a tablet that he cannot buy if his parents do not want to give him one and he also needs the wifi password that he cannot have if the parents do not give it to him or don’t change it if already knows it.
So it is obvious that when a child is online it is because he has the direct approval of the parents. Why the bureaucracy? It is not good practice at all to send over the internet digital copies (which do not deteriorate) of government documents such as ID cards. If the internet is only for people over 18, make it a criminal offence for parents to leave their children online and prosecute them for putting them at risk.
 
If a child wants to create an account on TikTok for example, he needs a smartphone or a tablet that he cannot buy if his parents do not want to give him one and he also needs the wifi password that he cannot have if the parents do not give it to him or don’t change it if already knows it.
So it is obvious that when a child is online it is because he has the direct approval of the parents. Why the bureaucracy? It is not good practice at all to send over the internet digital copies (which do not deteriorate) of government documents such as ID cards. If the internet is only for people over 18, make it a criminal offence for parents to leave their children online and prosecute them for putting them at risk.

I agree. Social Media is bad for kids and teens. But they can't use it, if parents don't give access to devices to use it.
 
Hot take:
AI is humanity's only hope. We're just not learning from past mistakes. This isn't working.
 
Heh lol, kids and teenagers will just ignore it, its kinda stupid and yeah there are parental options so setup on devices so they are more limited instead of making a dumb law that everyone will just ignore
 
This is funny. I thought Republicans wanted government out of people's lives (ex: guns, social security).
 
If a child wants to create an account on TikTok for example, he needs a smartphone or a tablet that he cannot buy if his parents do not want to give him one and he also needs the wifi password that he cannot have if the parents do not give it to him or don’t change it if already knows it.
So it is obvious that when a child is online it is because he has the direct approval of the parents. Why the bureaucracy? It is not good practice at all to send over the internet digital copies (which do not deteriorate) of government documents such as ID cards. If the internet is only for people over 18, make it a criminal offence for parents to leave their children online and prosecute them for putting them at risk.

So you've never been to a friend's house that had things such as unrestricted internet and an open PC that's locked down in your house?
 
Back