These CaaS subscriptions have been really poorly executed by most car manufacturers. Part of it lies in the way the car was sold to customers ("look, it can do this!") without emphasising that it's actually a trial. And a big part of it's the cost - looking at you, Audi.
The only ones to do it well that I've seen are Volvo. It's always referred to as a Volvo On-Call Subscription and it's a fairly insignificant cost (£35 for a year, £60 for 2 years). For that you get a mobile app with car location, remote activation of horn/headlights, remote start, remote boot/car opening, scheduled preconditioning, driving journal, temperature, diagnostics and reminders of service etc. All of this via a data sim in the back that Volvo pay for, which easily justifies the cost imo.
Compare to Audi, where (at least on my wife's car) for about £120 a year you get Google Maps imaging and the ability to send a f**ng tweet.
The only ones to do it well that I've seen are Volvo. It's always referred to as a Volvo On-Call Subscription and it's a fairly insignificant cost (£35 for a year, £60 for 2 years). For that you get a mobile app with car location, remote activation of horn/headlights, remote start, remote boot/car opening, scheduled preconditioning, driving journal, temperature, diagnostics and reminders of service etc. All of this via a data sim in the back that Volvo pay for, which easily justifies the cost imo.
Compare to Audi, where (at least on my wife's car) for about £120 a year you get Google Maps imaging and the ability to send a f**ng tweet.