Best Buy removes 32GB RAM worth $600 to "repair" customer's 64GB gaming laptop

[DragonSlayer101]

WTF?! Best Buy allegedly "repaired" a customer's gaming laptop by removing one of its two 32GB memory modules, reducing the system's installed RAM from 64GB to 32GB. The customer had sent the laptop to Best Buy for warranty repairs after it began experiencing random BSODs just eight months after purchase.

Redditor GRINZ_DOCTOR claims to have bought a Lenovo Legion 5 gaming laptop from Best Buy's website last December. The laptop reportedly worked as advertised for a few months before it began crashing during gaming sessions.

The device is powered by an Intel Core i9-14900HX processor and an Nvidia RTX 5070 GPU. It features a 15.1-inch WXGA display, 64GB of DDR5 RAM in a 2x32GB configuration, a 2TB SSD, and a 1TB dock station. On the software side, it runs Windows 11 Pro out of the box.

Once the random BSODs rendered the laptop unusable, the poster reinstalled Windows as a last-ditch attempt to resolve the problem. When that did not help, the laptop was sent to Best Buy for warranty repairs.

According to the official work order, the company received the device on July 25 and completed the repairs on August 4. However, when the laptop was shipped back, the owner discovered that it was missing its second memory module.

In the invoice, the company explained that the second SODIMM had been removed because the laptop only supports up to 32GB of system memory. The documentation also stated that the removed module, worth more than $600 as of August 2026, was returned with the device.

The work order allegedly issued by Best Buy.

The poster insists that the laptop was sold with 64GB of system memory and that they had not installed the additional module themselves. According to the Redditor, "this computer was listed with those specs and that's how it was prebuilt/sold."

The Legion 5 model in question is still available for purchase from Best Buy, where it is listed as "Lenovo - Upgraded - Legion 5." It's unclear what "Upgraded" means in this context, but online speculation suggests it could indicate that the third-party seller, PC Heaven, manually installed the second 32GB module.

Some Redditors who replied to the thread suggest the poster escalate the issue with Best Buy's online customer service. Others advised them to visit a store in person and speak with a manager, asking for either a second working memory module with the exact same specifications at no additional cost or a replacement laptop with identical hardware.

The OP has yet to reveal what their next course of action will be, but they have indicated that they intend to pursue this matter further with Best Buy.

Permalink to story:

Best Buy removes 32GB RAM worth $600 to "repair" customer's 64GB gaming laptop

 

[yRaz]

I've seen this story several times over the last few days and it pisses me off how sensationalized it is. The guy had a bad stick of RAM, they removed the bad stick then mailed him back a working laptop AND the bad stick. This isn't news

 

[jbright]

If the SKU was sold and listed with 64GB, "it doesn't support that" is a warranty tech problem, not a customer problem. They should've bricked the ticket back to Lenovo/PC Heaven, not just yanked a stick and shipped it home.

 

[sreams]

I've seen this story several times over the last few days and it pisses me off how sensationalized it is. The guy had a bad stick of RAM, they removed the bad stick then mailed him back a working laptop AND the bad stick. This isn't news

The laptop was delivered with 64GB. They refused to repair it because they claimed the laptop only supports up to 32GB. How does that make sense?

 

[PXAbstraction]

I've seen this story several times over the last few days and it pisses me off how sensationalized it is. The guy had a bad stick of RAM, they removed the bad stick then mailed him back a working laptop AND the bad stick. This isn't news

The laptop was marketed and sold with 64GB. It also worked for months with that configuration, meaning it is indeed compatible. Either way, it's the retailer/manufacturer's responsibility to adhere to what was sold. There is no scenario in which cutting an advertised spec in half to fix a problem that manifested months after purchase is the right course of action.

 

[yRaz]

The laptop was marketed and sold with 64GB. It also worked for months with that configuration, meaning it is indeed compatible. Either way, it's the retailer/manufacturer's responsibility to adhere to what was sold. There is no scenario in which cutting an advertised spec in half to fix a problem that manifested months after purchase is the right course of action.

A third party seller installed the RAM and sold it on best buys website like on Amazon. It was not sold by Best buy. It's a "we didn't sell it to you and it's out of spec for stock". That model, and it does have model number that tells you the OEM specs, did not have OEM hardware.

How much responsibility does Best Buy have here? I'm not sure, but a third party sold it someone and Best buy facilitated the deal. I don't think Best buy is responsible here. If you're LG TV breaks the retailer is going to tell you to take uo with the manufacturer. It seems like this guy needs to take it up with the company that sold him the laptop.

 

[yRaz]

The laptop was delivered with 64GB. They refused to repair it because they claimed the laptop only supports up to 32GB. How does that make sense?

Because they bought it through a thrif party seller that sold an upgraded version of the laptop through Besr Buys seller program just like on Amazon. Best buy looked at his laptop, said his ram was bad and now he has to take it up with the reseller. A non OEM part failed. If I put a water block on a 5090 and the water block fails, I don't goto nVidia asking for a new water block.

This is where the sensationalism comes in. BB isn't saying that the ram doesn't work because it's out of spec, they're saying the we know these aren't OEM parts because this laptop was never sold with this spec and it's not our responsibility at this point.

 

[havok585]

I've seen this story several times over the last few days and it pisses me off how sensationalized it is. The guy had a bad stick of RAM, they removed the bad stick then mailed him back a working laptop AND the bad stick. This isn't news

Brotha, do you not see the issue in your statement ? or just highly OBTUSE ?

as a REPAIR service you dont SEND The customer the faulty piece and say "well it's fixed, have at it BROTHER " ! Repair means, in this case to actually REPLACE the affected module but obviously these cheapskates did not want to do it because we all know why !

It does not matter if it's a third party or not, when you buy on AMAZON which is 99% third party you dont see amazon saying "well you bought from X, so have fun" shitty remarks.

 

[smf88011]

How does that make sense?

Simple - PC Haven decided to install an additional 32gb module thinking it can get past Lenovo's specs. The owner of the laptop should be talking to PC Haven, not Best Buy. The only thing Best Buy did was facilitate the transaction. Think of it like this - you buy tickets to a concert from a school. The concert is suddenly cancelled. Who do you get the money back from - the school fundraiser folks or the concert venue? Hint, you go after venue. Further, if you look at the Best Buy 3rd party purchase agreement, it says the same thing - you have to go to the actual seller of it, not Best Buy.

People look at prices of what they buy and not the actual seller. Why should the platform pay for non-manufacturer repairs when they didn't get to make any profit from the original sale in the first place? They might have made a very small fee for the transaction but sure as hell didn't get the profit.

 

[yRaz]

Brotha, do you not see the issue in your statement ? or just highly OBTUSE ?

as a REPAIR service you dont SEND The customer the faulty piece and say "well it's fixed, have at it BROTHER " ! Repair means, in this case to actually REPLACE the affected module but obviously these cheapskates did not want to do it because we all know why !

It does not matter if it's a third party or not, when you buy on AMAZON which is 99% third party you dont see amazon saying "well you bought from X, so have fun" shitty remarks.

The retailer can offer you a refund, warranty service is through a manufacturer. Best buy didn't sell them the laptop and the parts were not OEM parts. Here is the issue and your parts back here is a report you can use to get a warranty on your non OEM parts.

The parts aren't OEM, this is a Karen wanting to speak to someone's manager level stupidity.

There might be a legal issue here with the reseller and fraud, but best buy had nothing to do with any of it aside from facilitating a sale. Maybe best buy shiuld take care of the customer just from a PR perspective, but this whole thing is stupid.

The only thing that Best Buy can really do is offer them a refund and then go after the reseller banning them from future sales.

Best Buy does not owe this guy a new stick of RAM. This person has report they can now take to the manufacturer or reseller or whoever the ram has a warranty and say"this is faulty I need a new one"

 

[smf88011]

The laptop was marketed and sold with 64GB. It also worked for months with that configuration, meaning it is indeed compatible. Either way, it's the retailer/manufacturer's responsibility to adhere to what was sold. There is no scenario in which cutting an advertised spec in half to fix a problem that manifested months after purchase is the right course of action.

They are - 32gb of RAM is the manufacturer specs. PC Haven't put the 2nd module in, and the module went bad. Why should Lenovo pay for a 32gb module when they didn't sell the bad one in the first place?

 

[Hecate91]

Regardless of it being a third party seller, Bestbuy should do the right thing and have the laptop repaired to how it was originally shipped with 64GB of RAM.
What the seller did is no different than what several RAM vendors have done with refusing to replace RAM under warranty.

 

[Theinsanegamer]

Regardless of it being a third party seller, Bestbuy should do the right thing and have the laptop repaired to how it was originally shipped with 64GB of RAM.
What the seller did is no different than what several RAM vendors have done with refusing to replace RAM under warranty.

Best buy is not responsible for the warranty on the product. It was sold out of spec by a third party, you need to go through the third party to get the non standard hardware replaced.

 

[sreams]

Because they bought it through a thrif party seller that sold an upgraded version of the laptop through Besr Buys seller program just like on Amazon. Best buy looked at his laptop, said his ram was bad and now he has to take it up with the reseller. A non OEM part failed. If I put a water block on a 5090 and the water block fails, I don't goto nVidia asking for a new water block.

This is where the sensationalism comes in. BB isn't saying that the ram doesn't work because it's out of spec, they're saying the we know these aren't OEM parts because this laptop was never sold with this spec and it's not our responsibility at this point.

If Best Buy isn't the seller and isn't responsible for repairs, why did they accept it for repair? Also, do we know that the added module was the one that failed? Or was it the one that was already in the system before the 2nd one was added?

 

[Hecate91]

Bestbuy sold the laptop as the retailer, and accepted the repair, they should have some responsibility for the repair, or honor the warranty themselves and provide the owner with a 32GB stick of RAM. It doesn't matter if it's "out of spec" Bestbuy still sold the laptop through their site with 64GB of RAM, however it doesn't surprise me how incompetent Besbuy is.

 

[yRaz]

If Best Buy isn't the seller and isn't responsible for repairs, why did they accept it for repair? Also, do we know that the added module was the one that failed? Or was it the one that was already in the system before the 2nd one was added?

They run a for-profit repair service

 

[sreams]

They run a for-profit repair service

The article states that it was accepted "for warranty repair". If Best Buy does not acknowledge that they support the system as sold on their site, then they should refer the buyer to the entity that does support it, so the system can be repaired as it was sold.

 

[yRaz]

The article states that it was accepted "for warranty repair". If Best Buy does not acknowledge that they support the system as sold on their site, then they should refer the buyer to the entity that does support it, so the system can be repaired as it was sold.

And then when reviewing the product they found it didn't qualify for warranty repair because the parts that need repaired were not OEM parts. This is now between the selling and the buyer. The most they can really do is offer a refund and go after the seller. They are under no obligation to do that but the even the expectation that they are responsible in someway is absurd. Best buy would probably been able to work something out with Lenovo if these were stock parts, but they weren't. Lenovo and best buy are now out of the picture. The buyer can go after the seller for fraud and the most the best buy is obligated to do is offer a refund. If this ram switch is as big of a deal as some people in the thread want it to be, then replacing the ram could interfere with a criminal investigation for fraud.

So, yeah, I agree with best buy looking at the machine, noticing something is off and that it's been tampered with and saying "we aren't responsible for this".

Maybe if the soldered on CPU failed and they sent it back then the RAM wouldn't interfere with the warranty. That kind of stuff is illegal in the US, but asking them to honor an OEM warranty on non OEM parts is absurd.

 

[hahahanoobs]

The trend of using an individual's story from Reddit is lazy at best. Please stop.