In this case it is the politicians that have split off into a small group (aka: cult) thinking they know what is best for us. Meantime never asking anyone what that may be. Because they are selfish and don't care about anyone else. No the cult is the ones talking (if that is even true) about storming the White House.
What the f*** dude.
Here is the difference. Only the very far left supports that. Many mainline cons support people like David Duke.
Bring it if you must. You are in for a big surprise there.
It really isn't that bad but it is far worse than when the Orange Julius became president. We recovered from the 60s we can certainly recover from this.
Er, I never said that. This is completely beside the point and I don't support rioting, so I will ignore your straw man.
Agree there's a divide, but I would ask why? Eat the rich, not your fellow downtrodden compatriots. Some want to make the divide into a culture war, when I see the root of the problem to be asset and income inequality. If there must be a war, make it a class war.
How does moving towards renewable energy sources end America's energy independence? And it's not like the change to renewables will happen overnight - it's a gradual transition giving those affected plenty of time to adjust, and it benefits pretty much everyone but coal and oil barons.
Yes! Whether you feel entitled to them or not, public spending is by far the most efficient way to provide essential services such as transport, water, sanitation, healthcare and education. Those services cost money to provide, and raising taxes if necessary to pay for them is a no-brainer. The US's deteriorating infrastructure is due to chronic under-investment, and everyone would see the benefit of more public spending in these areas.
Religious or not, values are values, and some of them are fair game as hate speech. You don't get to be an a**hole, because, religion. TBH, I wouldn't have a huge problem if you hated on minorities in private. It's only when you start arguing they should have fewer legal rights, wave banners, and try to push bigoted beliefs on wider society that people start coming down on you for hate speech.
Sounds like pulling oil out of the ground like it's 1960, lowering taxes only if you're already rich, stripping benefits from the poorest, and making hate speech fair game. None of these sound like the way to a peaceful, prosperous society to me.
That is the cult I'm referring to
And it really is not his fault. The cult mentioned above has to go, or we will never have peace again.
No its actually because he is orange. Besides China already has a bff. Its tRUMP (see what I did there?).
Well, then I ahhhh, its just that,,,,,,Ok then.
See here is the thing, we agree on that. Both political extremes should be ignored.
Yes but there comes a time when ignoring is no longer an option. And we are reaching that point. It is easy to ignore them until your cities are burn and city officials are being killed left and right. And all they can do is bicker among themselves because they hate our president. Children is all they are.
All I can do from here is ask you to look up fox news during Obamas 8 years. Talk about a bunch of children.
If by "renewables", you mean wind and solar, then that's an easy question to answer. While both sources can be useful in peak shaving, neither source has the ability to provide baseline power. Which is why nation's like Germany have actually increased their CO2 emissions in lockstep with their increases in renewable sources ... all those windmills and solar farms need supplementing by natural gas generators.
Please explain how quadrupling the price of energy, while increasing the likelihood of brownouts and blackouts benefits me?
So why does the private sector provide these cheaper and better?
Actually, we pull far more oil out of the ground than we did in 1960. Back in the 1960s, environmentalist doomsayers were saying that we'd be out of oil by the year 2000 -- entirely out, not a drop in the world left. But since 1965, we've found five new barrels for every three we've burned ... and that doesn't even count the natural gas from fracking.
Can you please post at least once without including a major falsehood? Just once, that's all I ask.
That's funny. First off I'd need to be funded before I became a threat. Secondly I didn't say I was going to lead the charge. I said I would stand in defense of the Democrats trying to overthrow because they are butt-hurt over the election results. I have however stated I would like more in the past. But once again never stated I would lead the charge. And as far as being put on a watch list I honestly couldn't care less.
What's false? I live in rural Arkansas, I hear them all the time in bars and restaurants. Its no secret, if you can get your head out of the sand.
True. Those comments were worse.
Please post a list of the mainstream conservative figures you've seen in bars in rural Arkansas. George Will and Peggy Noonan hang out with you there a lot? Dinesh D'Sousa perhaps?
All the Left really would like to see is if you cons, and everyone really, are such good Christians then maybe you could stop redacting the parts of the Bible you don't like.
I think they'll stop redacting the bible when you stop redacting the Constitution.
I didn't say mainstream I said mainline (IE being part of an established group). I know CONServatives don't exactly have all the tread on their tires, but even the politicians and media leaders are not dumb enough to go public IF they do feel that way. You confused mainstream (IE a prevailing current or direction of influence) with mainline.
Maybe you should talk to tRUMP about that. And no, you do your own homework.
I think it's you who are confused over the meaning of terms:
