Ferrari bet its legacy on an EV designed by Jony Ive. The backlash wiped out $5 billion in a day.

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
A hot potato: Ferrari's long-awaited move into fully electric vehicles landed with an immediate financial jolt. Shares in the company dropped about 8% after the debut of the Luce, wiping out more than $5 billion in market value and signaling investor unease with both the design and the broader strategy. The reaction didn't stop with investors. Within hours of the unveiling, criticism spread across social media, owner forums, and even into Italian politics.

Matteo Salvini, Italy's deputy prime minister and transport minister, weighed in publicly, writing on X: "It looks nothing like a (Ferrari). Is this supposed to be 'innovation'? Who knows what (company founder) Enzo Ferrari would say." That kind of response shows how far the Luce departs from Ferrari's established identity.

In the same post, a video of former Ferrari boss Luca Cordero di Montezemolo is seen lamenting on the Luce: "If I said what I really think, I'd harm Ferrari. We're risking the destruction of a myth, I'm very sorry about that. I hope they at least remove the Prancing Horse from that car."

The Luce is Ferrari's first fully electric model, its first five-seater, and the most expensive of its non-supercar cars, with a starting price around €550,000 ($640,000).

It was developed with help from former Apple design chief Jony Ive and his firm LoveFrom, a partnership reflected in the Luce's glass-heavy design and more open interior layout.

Beneath the styling lies a heavy engineering lift. The Luce uses four electric motors and a low center of gravity, a setup meant to keep handling sharp even with the weight of its batteries. Ferrari also worked on sound, with the motors and components producing a noise inspired by an electric guitar, a deliberate nod to the emotional role once filled by its combustion engines.

Those technical decisions reflect a broader challenge facing high-end EVs: how to replicate the sensory experience of traditional performance cars in a fundamentally different architecture. Ferrari appears to be leaning into that problem rather than avoiding it.

Company leadership has been direct about the risks. Chief Executive Benedetto Vigna described the project as intentionally provocative, writing on LinkedIn that "Real innovation is not democratic. Breakthrough ideas rarely emerge from immediate consensus." Chairman John Elkann framed the Luce as "definitely a car of the future," suggesting the company sees this less as an extension of its lineup and more as a reset.

Not everyone is convinced. Former Ferrari chairman Luca di Montezemolo was sharply critical, telling the Financial Times, "We risk destroying a legend, and I'm truly sorry about that." He added, "At least, I hope they take the horse off that car." Among longtime Ferrari owners, the response has been similarly blunt.

Luc Poirier, a Montreal-based collector with more than 40 Ferraris, reacted to the design by telling the Wall Street Journal, "Oh boy, how ugly she is," and questioned the price point: "How (do you) justify a 400,000 to 500,000 price for this? Unbelievable."

Even so, not all of the feedback has focused on aesthetics. Some early interest has centered on how the car performs rather than how it looks. Jim Meek, chairman of the Ferrari Club of America, said that while skepticism is widespread, "They're anxious to see what it looks like in person, and more interested to see how it drives."

That distinction may matter. Ferrari is entering the electric market at a time when demand – especially at the high end – has become less certain. Several competitors have already scaled back or delayed EV plans after overestimating consumer appetite. Ferrari has adjusted its expectations, now targeting fully electric models to account for 20% of its lineup by 2030, down from earlier ambitions.

The Luce also appears aimed at a different kind of buyer. Analysts say Ferrari is looking beyond its traditional base and toward new customers, particularly in tech circles. The pricing, design, and collaboration with Ive all point in that direction.

For now, the early response suggests Ferrari has succeeded in one respect: getting attention. Whether that translates into sustained demand is less clear. As Bernstein analyst Stephen Reitman put it, "If Ferrari builds the car, the clients will come. That has been the Ferrari Way."

The Luce will test whether that formula still holds when the engine noise – and much of what defined the brand for decades – is gone.

Permalink to story:

 
Let's be honest, do you think its appearance will stop people who are fans of the brand AND have money?
How many people of those who disliked the video on YT have money to buy it?
I think it will be just fine and sell well.
P.S. that new ugly Jaguar is in the new James Bond game.
 
Let's be honest, do you think its appearance will stop people who are fans of the brand AND have money?
How many people of those who disliked the video on YT have money to buy it?
I think it will be just fine and sell well.
P.S. that new ugly Jaguar is in the new James Bond game.
Honestly yes, I do think the appearance will be a turn off to existing & potential Ferrari customers. The sort of person who buys a Ferrari wants a car that sticks out and draws attention to them. This thing looks like a BYD random animal name and fake badges.
 
Honestly yes, I do think the appearance will be a turn off to existing & potential Ferrari customers. The sort of person who buys a Ferrari wants a car that sticks out and draws attention to them. This thing looks like a Leaf with a body kit and fake badges.
Will see. First there was a Jag, then this. If we see another one, I will say we have a trend.
 
It looks like a Leaf, like something from Playmobil, like a sportscar designed by Landrover, like something for in CP77.

Yet, let's see how it drives. And provided I had the money and wanted a sports car, I would buy it.

Whatever happens, I think it will become a collector's item.
 
Ferrari has clearly either misread its intended audience or purposely tried to create something entirely different for a different kind of buyer, albeit one that is just as wealthy, which they have more or less acknowledged. We’ll see whether it gains any traction at all, because so far no one has really made a successful exotic EV.

In my opinion (I’m not Ferrari’s target customer), the car does have many cool details, especially the interior. As for the exterior, I think they would have been better off sacrificing some drag efficiency in favor of a more elegant and less bulky design, rather than the Hyundai sort of look they ended up with.

They also probably should have avoided showing it in light blue, which makes it look toy-like. Just Ferrari red and black, a more aggressive limited-edition aesthetic, and focused more on demonstrating the actual performance instead of the advertisement-style press coverage, public reaction might have been far more positive.
 
The couple of Ferrari owners that I know hate this car. They don't get the car they have just because it says "Ferrari" on it. They got it for the look (which the EV version is buttassugly) that stands out with the sleek design and sportscar appeal, for the sound and the feeling you get from sitting there with a V12.

This thing is like the car Homer designed....what an atrocity. All I have is an opinion about it, I couldn't afford one unless I liquidated everything I had....then I could just live out of the car and try to steal electricity to keep it charged.
 
Indeed this is targeted at people who have the money and want to project a certain image to the world. The rest of us scrubs who aren't in the market for a $500K car can have our opinions but honestly whatever.

Like the Cybertruck, but without the pretense of mass market appeal.

All that said, I don't get electric car "faces". These guys can design a front end that looks like whatever they want that doesn't have to yield to practical considerations of fitting an engine and they decide to go with "engine compartment with an ugly or missing grill". Why?
 
LOL all these overreactions are ridiculous.
The first market reaction is often irrational, and even more often inconsequential. The opinions of internet busybodies always waiting for something new to hate are of exactly zero importance.

There's no drama. We will know what the potential customers think soon.
 
LOL all these overreactions are ridiculous.
The first market reaction is often irrational, and even more often inconsequential. The opinions of internet busybodies always waiting for something new to hate are of exactly zero importance.

There's no drama. We will know what the potential customers think soon.
Exactly, a lot of people are skipping over this is a spacious GT EV, it also goes from 0-60 in 2.5 seconds while weighing just over five thousand pounds, I can recognize I'm not Ferraris target customer, I can appreciate the nuances of the design, im not a fan of its *** but hey, most people with that kind of money to just dole out for a niche ferarri are the kind of people who dont really have a good sense of taste either.
 
Exactly, a lot of people are skipping over this is a spacious GT EV, it also goes from 0-60 in 2.5 seconds while weighing just over five thousand pounds, I can recognize I'm not Ferraris target customer, I can appreciate the nuances of the design, im not a fan of its *** but hey, most people with that kind of money to just dole out for a niche ferarri are the kind of people who dont really have a good sense of taste either.
No this is a car that Ferrari will force people to buy so they can buy the good cars in a couple of years
 
It looks absolutely awful. Like a cheap Chinese knockoff of an EV, with a playskool interior complete with awkwardly attached iPad instead of buttons.

They want $630k for this abomination.
 
Exactly, a lot of people are skipping over this is a spacious GT EV, it also goes from 0-60 in 2.5 seconds while weighing just over five thousand pounds, I can recognize I'm not Ferraris target customer, I can appreciate the nuances of the design, im not a fan of its *** but hey, most people with that kind of money to just dole out for a niche ferarri are the kind of people who dont really have a good sense of taste either.
But none of that is impressive enough on its own. A mach e will have a nicer interior at just $50k, and have a longer range. GT car my arse.

The model s plaid can be found used for a tenth the price and is slightly faster (and also has a longer range).

And being an EV, you know that there will be no glorious ferrari v8/10/12 noises either.
 
Back