Ferrari's first EV brings 1,000 horsepower, four motors, a $640,000 price tag, and Jony Ive design input

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
First look: Ferrari is not easing into electrification. With the debut of the Luce, the automaker has taken an unapologetically technical approach to its first fully electric production car. The Luce is not positioned as a limited-run experiment or halo concept. It slots into the regular Ferrari lineup as a series-production model, with pricing at around €550,000,f or about $640,000.

The Luce runs on a new architecture with a four-motor layout – one motor at each wheel – that produces just over 1,000 horsepower in its most aggressive mode. The setup allows for precise, independent control at each corner of the car.

The rear motors each produce 355 kilowatts, while the front pair adds 105 kilowatts each. These units, derived from Ferrari's F80 program, spin at extremely high speeds – up to 30,000 rpm in the front and 25,500 rpm in the rear.

What stands out is not just the power, but how it is managed. Instead of simulating a traditional gearbox, Ferrari has introduced a system called Torque Shift Engagement. The steering wheel paddles are still there, but they no longer shift gears.

The right paddle adjusts how aggressively torque is delivered, while the left controls the intensity of regenerative braking. The idea is to give the driver real-time control over how the car behaves entering and exiting corners, rather than mimicking the feel of a combustion engine.

It works with Ferrari's E-Manettino drive modes, which adjust the car's response and drivetrain behavior. Ferrari says that with four independent motors and rear-wheel steering, the Luce can feel surprisingly close to a smaller mid-engine sports car despite its footprint.

The battery system is just as integral to the car's design. Built on an 800-volt architecture, the pack is structural, meaning it contributes to the chassis' rigidity. Its placement lowers the center of gravity significantly – by nearly 3.7 inches compared to the Purosangue – which Ferrari says creates a driving sensation similar to shedding hundreds of pounds.

The battery modules were developed with SK On and are designed to accommodate future cell technologies, an indication that Ferrari is thinking beyond the current generation of EV hardware. Fast charging is rated at up to 350 kilowatts.

Aerodynamics shaped much of the exterior. Without a large combustion engine dictating proportions, Ferrari pursued a more fluid form, arriving at a drag coefficient of 0.254 without relying on active aerodynamic elements. The design was developed with input from LoveFrom, the firm founded by Jony Ive, though Ferrari emphasizes that engineering requirements came first.

The result is a car with a teardrop-like cabin and a continuous surface that blends the hood into the windshield. Even smaller details were reworked, including patented windshield wipers designed to manage airflow more efficiently. The Luce also carries the largest wheels ever fitted to a production Ferrari – 23 inches at the front and 24 at the rear.

Inside, the approach is more restrained than expected. Rather than filling the cabin with screens, Ferrari has opted for a central display that can be oriented toward either the driver or passenger. The absence of a transmission tunnel opens up space for a true five-seat layout, along with 21.1 cubic feet of cargo capacity – an unusually practical figure for the brand.

The interior features extensive use of aluminum and glass, with clean, well-integrated digital controls. The design draws from consumer tech, but focuses more on build quality and ease of use than flashy visuals.

Sound, often a sticking point for electric performance cars, has been approached from a technical angle. Instead of artificial engine noise, the Luce uses an accelerometer to pick up actual vibrations from the motors and structure. An algorithm filters those signals, emphasizing certain frequencies to produce a sound profile audible both inside and outside the vehicle. Drivers can adjust or disable it as desired.

With the Luce, Ferrari is not trying to replicate the past. The car introduces a different set of tools for performance and engagement, built around software, control systems, and electric power delivery. It marks a clear shift in how the company defines what a Ferrari can be in an electric era.

Permalink to story:

 
Wait a few minutes, then people that can't afford one, will complain about it. Internet 101. Poor people hate on products they never can afford. This is the new reality and it will only get worse and worse over the next years.
 
Ferrari is really diluting their brand with SUVs. Everyone is, but I've been watching lots of long time Ferrari people stop buying into to the brand because of the uncertainty of where it's going. On a technical level, I'm sure this is a fantastic vehicle, but it's just not a Ferrari. Porsche, while they do sell EVs, has said they will not be giving up on ICE powered vehicles for their high end offerings.

As a life long car guy, I'm really disappointed at watching car culture starting to be filled with luxury SUVs. Luxury SUVs were a thing my whole life, but watching exotic car brands using their names to sell Luxury SUVs for nearly a million dollars is heart breaking.

And I'm not against EVs or anything, but I'm hoping to get both the new Slate electric truck and once the economy settles down I might actually be able to get my dream Porsche, a 911 Targa.
 
Wait a few minutes, then people that can't afford one, will complain about it. Internet 101. Poor people hate on products they never can afford. This is the new reality and it will only get worse and worse over the next years.
Why would people who can't afford it complain??? Or hate it?
It's a technological marvel, what's there to hate??
I mean, the followers of the Religion Of Envy (a.k.a socialism) will complain & hate for sure, but that's not 'people', just the tiny subset of damaged people.
 
Why would people who can't afford it complain??? Or hate it?
It's a technological marvel, what's there to hate??
I mean, the followers of the Religion Of Envy (a.k.a socialism) will complain & hate for sure, but that's not 'people', just the tiny subset of damaged people.
Because people hate what they can't afford. Talk smack about it.

Read other posts. Most can't afford new hardware right now, most hate new hardware as a result.

It is called denying reality. Human nature - FOMO.

100% of the people who talks crap about this car, can't afford it in the first place. Would they take it for free? Yes they would love that, and then it would be an awesome car. Human mind works like that.
 
Wait a few minutes, then people that can't afford one, will complain about it. Internet 101. Poor people hate on products they never can afford. This is the new reality and it will only get worse and worse over the next years.
It is not a "new reality". It's as ancient as history
 
It is not a "new reality". It's as ancient as history
Nah it became worse in recent years, after people can't afford new hardware, they hate on new hardware.

But true, poor people always hated on stuff they can't afford. This is not new.
 
Because people hate what they can't afford. Talk smack about it.

Read other posts. Most can't afford new hardware right now, most hate new hardware as a result.

It is called denying reality. Human nature - FOMO.

100% of the people who talks crap about this car, can't afford it in the first place. Would they take it for free? Yes they would love that, and then it would be an awesome car. Human mind works like that.
If the people around you make you think that, seriously consider changing your environment because it will affect you.
If your sweeping generalizations are based on what you see on social media .. you know it has nothing to do with real life, right?

I can't remember hating something because I can't afford it, and I don't know people (with very few exceptions, perhaps) who would. What you describe is not how the human mind works, it's how the damaged human mind works. But again, the crap talk you see on the internet is mostly trolls and bots, with a small part of foaming losers in the mix. Normal people do not radiate hate in all directions.
 
If the people around you make you think that, seriously consider changing your environment because it will affect you.
If your sweeping generalizations are based on what you see on social media .. you know it has nothing to do with real life, right?

I can't remember hating something because I can't afford it, and I don't know people (with very few exceptions, perhaps) who would. What you describe is not how the human mind works, it's how the damaged human mind works. But again, the crap talk you see on the internet is mostly trolls and bots, with a small part of foaming losers in the mix. Normal people do not radiate hate in all directions.
Just look around this forum, and you will see tons of people who think just like that. Everything new, they hate, because they can't afford it.

Makes you wonder why they visit a hardware forum, when they can't afford any of it.

I don't know any people IRL that thinks like this, as I don't hang around loosers.
 
The design is a lot more utilitarian and dare I say even pedestrian in comparison to what we've seen from Ferrari in the past.
 
Yeah. Tired of poor people talking smack about new tech because they can't afford it.
You need to get out of the basement a little more and reconnect with reality. Do you think everyone lives the same financial life or sees the world through the same lens. Did you recently come into an inheritance or something, or is this just how you felt at one time and so you view everyone else in this light?

Trying to belittle people around the world on a tech forum to feel superior is a strange flex I guess.

As for the car itself, I can afford it just fine, and I still wouldn't buy one. I simply don't like the way it looks, and that's enough reason for me to "hate on it".

Your opinion here adds nothing meaningful to the conversation, it's mostly just white noise meant to make yourself feel better. I’ve noticed this pattern too, you seem to come out of the woodwork in almost every thread with the same kind of condescending nonsense.
 
SRcVjTvEY9k6Vh9S.jpeg
 
As for the car itself, I can afford it just fine, and I still wouldn't buy one. I simply don't like the way it looks, and that's enough reason for me to "hate on it".
You can afford a $640,000 car but you wouldn't buy it because you don't like the way it looks? What cars are you buying at that price range? Personally I wouldn't buy a car any more expensive than 1/10th of that price lol. I care about value before preference.
 
You can afford a $640,000 car but you wouldn't buy it because you don't like the way it looks? What cars are you buying at that price range? Personally I wouldn't buy a car any more expensive than 1/10th of that price lol. I care about value before preference.
You're arguing against something I never said. Being able to afford something doesn't automatically mean I should want it. People pass on expensive things all the time because of styling, practicality, reliability, comfort, or simply personal preference.

You prioritize value over preference, and that's fine. But value itself is subjective. To you, value might be "cheapest transportation possible." To someone else it could be performance, luxury, craftsmanship, technology, or simply buying something they actually enjoy looking at.

By that logic, anyone driving anything beyond a basic economy car is wasting money. Most people don't live that way.

For me, I’m trying to build generational wealth, not burn money on things just because they carry a massive price tag. I can afford expensive things and still decide they’re a poor use of money. I’m not getting where I want to be by buying this type of nonsense.

And for the record, I said I wouldn't buy it because I don't like how it looks. That's called having preferences and priorities, not financial limitations.
 
You're arguing against something I never said.
I didn't argue against anything. I asked for clarification on what you said because it didn't make sense to me, and I gave my own opinion about buying the Ferrari Luce. You didn't answer my question about what car you would buy either. If you wouldn't buy any car at that price range, that's fine but it sounds like you have the same opinion as me lol. It's just that your purchase price threshold is different from mine.

Also what car at $64,000 is considered a basic economy car? It seems like you're the one putting words into my mouth.
 
I love EV. I love owning EV. I love driving EV.

My problem is, I can't get an EV built the way I want it built.

I would love to have a large two door coupe EV. Chrysler will NEVER build the Halcyon Concept. I think that looks better than this. I guess I'll just have to wait.
 
I didn't argue against anything. I asked for clarification on what you said because it didn't make sense to me, and I gave my own opinion about buying the Ferrari Luce. You didn't answer my question about what car you would buy either. If you wouldn't buy any car at that price range, that's fine but it sounds like you have the same opinion as me lol. It's just that your purchase price threshold is different from mine.

Also what car at $64,000 is considered a basic economy car? It seems like you're the one putting words into my mouth.
My bad, I may have read more into your comment than you intended.

My point wasn't that I wouldn't buy any car in that price range. It was that affordability and desirability aren't the same thing. I can afford something and still think it's ugly, poor value, or simply not aligned with my priorities.

I wasn't calling a $64,000 car a basic economy car. I was making a broader point that if value alone is the deciding factor, then almost everyone eventually draws a line somewhere.

As for what I'd buy at that price if I wanted to spend $640k? With the current state of the market, I probably wouldn't buy much of anything right now. My last new truck was in 2020, and I got a great deal on it while trading in my old truck. It'll probably be my last new vehicle purchase for quite some time. Prices are still out of control, and I don't see many vehicles today being built with the level of quality I'd expect at these price points. I also don't feel any need to keep chasing new purchases just for the sake of buying something newer.
 
Back