FTC names three Amazon executives in lawsuit over shady Prime subscription practices

midian182

Posts: 9,589   +120
Staff member
In brief: The FTC has named three Amazon executives in its case against the company. The agency alleges that the tech giant pushed, or tricked, people into signing up for the Prime service and made unsubscribing a task so arduous that many give up trying.

In June, the FTC sued Amazon for allegedly violating the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act. The Commission said in its complaint that Amazon knowingly tricked people into signing up for Prime through the use of "Dark Patterns" – designing the app and web pages in a way that can make people sign up without really knowing it - and deliberately made canceling the payments far too hard.

The Reg reports that three Amazon execs have been named in the complaint: Neil Lindsay, former head of the Prime team and now a member of Amazon's management team advising on corporate strategy; current boss Russell Grandinetti; and Prime VP Jamil Ghani.

It's alleged that Amazon customer services representatives were told to purposely make canceling Prime subscriptions a lengthy process even though it could be done quickly. It's also claimed that the named execs knowingly made the process more complicated to retain customers, and even enrolled people who were not active Amazon buyers.

"Prime subscription fees account for $25 billion of Amazon's annual revenue. Approximately 70 percent of Amazon's revenue comes from American consumers. […] Consequently, one of Amazon's primary business goals – and the primary business goal of Prime – is increasing subscriber numbers," the lawsuit states.

In 2022, internal Amazon documents obtained by Insider showed the company had, since 2017, been concerned that its user interface designs led customers into feeling manipulated into signing up for Prime. The documents also showed that Amazon intentionally made the process of canceling Prime so long that it became known as the Iliad, a reference to Homer's 15,693-line poem.

Amazon spokesperson Heather Layman said in a statement that the FTC's claims are "false on the facts and the law."

"The truth is that customers love Prime, and by design we make it clear and simple for customers to both sign up for or cancel their Prime membership," Layman added.

Earlier this year, the FTC proposed a 'Click to Cancel' provision that would require companies to make the process of canceling recurring subscriptions as simple as signing up for them. Trade groups representing publishers, advertisers, and video game companies say a simpler cancelation process would confuse consumers and create problems for businesses.

Permalink to story.

 
I agree that it should be one simple click to cancel a subscription, maybe two. One to cancel and a second to confirm your choice. Nice, easy to see, read, find and execute.

I buy something off Amazon maybe twice a year (I really do hate Amazon, but sometimes it is the only choice outside of Ebay and I hate Ebay almost as much as Amazon) and those couple of times I do I always get a 30-day free trial of Prime so my purchase can be eligible for free 2-day shipping! As soon as I place my order after taking the 30-day free trial I go to the subscription section for my account and then have to click through 5 different pages of crap to confirm I actually want to stop my prime membership. It is a pain, but it isn't that difficult, just overly annoying and unnecessarily long. It does need to be simplified to:

Keep or Cancel

If you choose Cancel, one last question to confirm:
"You chose to cancel your Prime Membership, please click YES to confirm or NO to keep your membership"
 
Theve been doing this **** for years and get away with it,lost count of the times I've been signed up to prime without knowing
 
There are things I like about Amazon and other business practices they should be made to atone for. Failing to get a persons agreement to renew is the major one. (1) I have declined automatic renewal a number of times but when I check back, it's turned back on. (2) Their refusal to un-bundle all the junk as part of the prime membership and let the customer pick and choose only what they want. (3) No discount for members over 65 is completely unfriendly, especially for us shut-ins that have to depend upon them. (4) Automatic credits for returns in their gift cards rather than refunded back on the credit card.
 
Here's a tip.If your subscription expires don't use your desktop or laptop to watch movies because it warns you it's expired but if you use your Firestick it doesn't know and you still get Free movies. This has worked for a few months.
 
Making things simple "would confuse consumers" is a pretty funny defense for these scammy practices. I'm not big into government trying to control business but I don't mind these kind of cases.
 
Back