Wonder how they can afford to do that... sounds like an investment of thousands of hours to get to the point where they can make money on it?

 

Ya gotta give Google props - like their products or not, they are on the cutting edge and the driving force of many different apps. Seems like everyone else is either playing catch-up or copy-cat to them.

 

I would like to see an image recognition search (upload an image and have it search for it online) to see if any of my copyrighted images are being used without my permission. THAT would be a neat technology.

 

Wow this is pretty genius on the part of Google. I'm impressed at least.

 

How do you think that software would handle widely photographed locations?
Vacation in NYC (can't post pictures of new york skyline, already copyrighted by someone else)
Vacation in LA (can't post pictures of monuments - Golden Gate Bridge, etc.

The list goes on.

 

That TinEye link is interesting - a reverse image search service. I wonder how accurately it can distinguish between, say, JimBob Photog's digitally enhanced, copyrighted image of a cityscape and your Aunt Maud's point-and-shoot pic of the same scene. From this TS item, it seems Google's filter would ignore both pics unless it finds a Creative Commons or similar license specifically attached. That's pretty limiting but I can see how it could grow in usefulness over time, especially for companies worried about inadvertent copyright violation.