Google is building a Blink-based iOS browser in violation of Apple's rules

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,386   +43
Staff
The big picture: Regulators and developers have long criticized some of Apple's restrictions on iOS, including requiring all web browsers to use Apple's WebKit engine. As regulators fight the tech giant's policies, some may already be preparing for a less-restricted iOS environment.

Chromium bug reports indicate Google is currently building a new iOS web browser based on Blink, which would violate Apple's rule that all browsers on the platform use WebKit. Google insists the project is only an experiment, but it could be waiting for Apple's WebKit requirement to collapse under regulatory pressure.

The bug report describes the development as a graphics and input latency test, not a product Google intends to ship to end users. However, a source told The Register that the browser, although extremely early and lacking critical features, looks like the foundation for an alternate iOS browser.

Google could be waiting to see what happens to the WebKit rule, which regulators and developers have increasingly scrutinized in recent months. If Apple allows other browser engines, it would be advantageous for Google to have one waiting in the wings with enhanced functionality.

Last summer, Telegram founder Pavel Durov claimed that Apple's policy is a scheme to force developers to create separate apps that are subject to the App Store's 30 percent sales commission. Durov said if Apple did more to support WebKit or allowed browser developers to use other engines, many companies could provide their desired services through mobile web pages instead of maintaining apps.

Apple's ban on alternate browser engines has also come under fire from UK, US, and EU regulators. The EU's recently enacted Digital Markets Act may force Apple to allow other browser engines and alternate app distribution channels within the next couple of years. The US Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration also spoke against the company's restrictions earlier this month.

Meanwhile, Cupertino insists that its tight controls keep its products safer for users. Late last month, it criticized proposals from the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) concerning the restrictions on mobile browsers and cloud gaming.

The CMA has investigated Apple's browser and cloud policies for months, labeling them anti-competitive. The regulator's suggested remedies include allowing other browser engines, cloud gaming apps, sideloading apps, and more. Cupertino claims the CMA's proposals fall outside the scope of its investigation due to general bias against the company's software policies.

With regulators turning against Apple's walled garden, it isn't surprising to see Google planning for massive changes that could impact iOS.

Permalink to story.

 
What's to stop Apple from making 2 types of phone if regulators force them to allow 3rd party apps/stores/etc ?

Make secure locked down phones like they already do, and a single under powered, overpriced and insecure phone for the crybabies

Technically, they would be within the new rules
See, we made the phone you asked for!

It doesn't get updates though because it will never be secure under these new rules

Win / Win
--------------

For all of you who "choose" to believe that Apple should simply allow their standard phones to be unlocked by the end users in order to install whatever they want......

iPhones will be jailbroken and loaded with malicious programs (by criminals) before they are sold

THAT must not be allowed to happen, regardless of what you "choose" to believe!
 
Last edited:
What's to stop Apple from making 2 types of phone if regulators force them to allow 3rd party apps/stores/etc ?

Make secure locked down phones like they already do, and a single under powered, overpriced and insecure phone for the crybabies

Technically, they would be within the new rules
See, we made the phone you asked for!

It doesn't get updates though because it will never be secure under these new rules

Win / Win
--------------

For all of you who "choose" to believe that Apple should simply allow their standard phones to be unlocked by the end users in order to install whatever they want......

iPhones will be jailbroken and loaded with malicious programs (by criminals) before they are sold

THAT must not be allowed to happen, regardless of what you "choose" to believe!

It wouldn't be an issue at all. If you buy through a Apple-authorized reseller your "Open Apple" phone would have a very low chance of including malware. If you buy it through anyone else you take your chances. Either way you don't get any protections or guarantees unless you go with the closed ecosystem versions and the price is the same either way. I suggested exactly this not long ago.
 
I've never understood how Apple get away with the WebKit only rule.

Microsoft got told off for making IE the default browser in Windows due to their market dominance.

Before Android exploded in popularity, Apple was the smartphone dominant force and even today holds a large chunk of the market.

How can regulators tell one company off for making their own browser default (but never blocked alternatives from being installed) yet Apple gets away with forcing the use of a single browser engine?
 
What's to stop Apple from making 2 types of phone if regulators force them to allow 3rd party apps/stores/etc ?

Make secure locked down phones like they already do, and a single under powered, overpriced and insecure phone for the crybabies

Technically, they would be within the new rules
See, we made the phone you asked for!

It doesn't get updates though because it will never be secure under these new rules

Win / Win
--------------

For all of you who "choose" to believe that Apple should simply allow their standard phones to be unlocked by the end users in order to install whatever they want......

iPhones will be jailbroken and loaded with malicious programs (by criminals) before they are sold

THAT must not be allowed to happen, regardless of what you "choose" to believe!

Nothing, but they wouldn't be able to sell their non-compliant devices in countries that have that regulation and any attempts to do so would lead to seizures of said devices not already sold and hefty fines.
 
Nothing, but they wouldn't be able to sell their non-compliant devices in countries that have that regulation and any attempts to do so would lead to seizures of said devices not already sold and hefty fines.

You missed the point

Apple could sell only crappy / underpowered / overpriced phones to the Countries that want only garbage and insecurity

They are not obliged to make ALL of their phones insecure

You do not run Apple and you do not make the rules for Apple!

Win/Win
 
You missed the point

Apple could sell only crappy / underpowered / overpriced phones to the Countries that want only garbage and insecurity

They are not obliged to make ALL of their phones insecure

You do not run Apple and you do not make the rules for Apple!

Win/Win
They could. They won't.

And even if they did, it's not like other mobile devices are somehow so far behind Apple. We're hardly starved for choice. And believe it or not, outside of North America, the cult of Apple is nowhere near as strong.

But hey, if you like the taste of that leather, you go at it bud.
 
They could. They won't.

And even if they did, it's not like other mobile devices are somehow so far behind Apple. We're hardly starved for choice. And believe it or not, outside of North America, the cult of Apple is nowhere near as strong.

But hey, if you like the taste of that leather, you go at it bud.
FANTASTIC!

Go buy something else and stop complaining about what you think Apple should do
 
FANTASTIC!

Go buy something else and stop complaining about what you think Apple should do
Wouldn't that be nice for all monopolistic companies if everyone did that.
No. I have the right to dislike monopolistic practices even if I dont use any Apple products.
 
Or how about you don't try and say what my rights should be where I live from another jurisdiction?
But you DO NOT have the rights to dictate how "ALL" Apple products are made

As I said, Apple can make for you, an underpowed / overpriced / insecure iPhone to meet "your" standards / laws and rights

But they can also make a better phone for everyone who wants one
A phone that does not bend to your wishes / laws and alleged rights

Win / Win
 
Back