How Intel Got Into Trouble: We Test the Last Decade of Intel Flagship CPUs

Lovely and well-written article.
For my most recent build I carefully chose an i9-9900KF - the F version (no graphics) because supposedly it's a better chip - that choice bit me in the butt when my graphics card died on me - smart moves sometimes turn out differently.
I'm happy I picked this one - even now it still kicks buitt, relatively spoken. With the current hardware drama in full swing it's unlikely I can build something new any time soon, but the 9900 will remain relevant for a long time I think.
One little pang of regret: I had the opportunity to go Xeon with a similar clock rate for the same kind of cash. Decided against it because the new build was going to replace my old main box and I needed be sure it would work for me. Even now I sometimes think "You should have gone Xeon you little weasel!" Hahaha.

Fully agree re: Lovely and well written article.

BTW: I was planning on purchasing the exact same i9-9900KF as you. But:
See my post above. I got lucky and have the "special version" 127 watt I9-9900KS for the price of the regular K version.
Yes, it still kicks butt. 5.21GHz all cores all the time. (I switched off HT as it's a gaming PC.)
 
Last edited:
The world is wider than what you imagine others are doing.
It's not that wide. Which is why one company still owns 76.1%.
At 1440p Intels CPU's game as well as any X3D chip or within a very unnoticable real world difference. All AMD did was add a crap ton of usable on-core cache for the CPU's to help render quickly. Intels bLLC chips will have more cache then AMD's chips with faster communication throughput inside and out.
 
My old i7 980X OC to 4.5Ghz is still playable even in 2026 in non AVX games.

RDR2

FC6
]

Cyberpunk 2077
 
Last edited:
Well gee... Intel rarely supports a "socket" over a mere "refresh" and actual professionals use the Xeon platforms for "multicore" performance rather than the "consumer" offerings.

Their lackluster generation over generation over generation (exc...) is why folks shy away from multiple "new" generations at a time as there truly is little to no benefit for "upgrading".
 
Back