Web HTML5 replaces Flash as default player on YouTube

Shawn Knight

Posts: 12,522   +122
Staff member
HTML5 is now the default setting for video playback on YouTube when using Chrome, IE 11, Safari 8 and beta versions of Firefox. If you needed any more evidence to support the claim that Flash is dead, it doesn't get...

[newwindow="https://www.techspot.com/news/59545-html5-replaces-flash-default-player-youtube.html"]Read more[/newwindow]
 

madboyv1

Posts: 1,601   +491
Very good news! Now we only have Java to deal with.
Commercial use, both in various appliances of different genres as well as 1st party software will keep it long relevant and most damningly, vulnerable. Because of the manufacturer's terrible programmers, we're still stuck using Java 6.20 < 6.45 if we want the ~least~ buggy rendering of their software. Technically it works on 7.25 < 7.50 but the interface is glitchy at best, and simply fails to start beyond that. =/
 

amstech

Posts: 2,643   +1,804
Pretty big kick in the face to Adobe, even though it was freeware its still another entity of business that helped their overall business model.
 

BlueDrake

Posts: 378   +113
and beta versions of Firefox
Starting with which version of Firefox?
35 has support for HTML5 (need to visit /html5 part of YouTube), 36 is the latest in beta and 38 is the latest nightly build. There's better support in the beta. I've found if I paused any HTML5 videos it locks up randomly, so I went back to flash for now. (Using Firefox 35 now, was using 34 previously)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cliffordcooley

Tekkaraiden

Posts: 996   +93
Pretty big kick in the face to Adobe, even though it was freeware its still another entity of business that helped their overall business model.
Actually when they bought Macromedia the first think I was hoping for was for them to dump flash.
 
G

Guest

HTML5 is hysterically PC incompatible. Working on 10 video from 100 maybe, Flash 50 or more.
 

BlueDrake

Posts: 378   +113
HTML5 is hysterically PC incompatible. Working on 10 video from 100 maybe, Flash 50 or more.
Hysterically?

Tell me more...
I'd like to know also. I only found it's kinda buggy, depending on browser. Mostly prefer Firefox but.. it's kinda slow to the HTML5 party, and often locked up on videos when pausing / unpausing. Other than that it's pretty nice, I'm hoping to see it rolled out sooner or later with better support.
 
G

Guest

HTML5 radically faster than flash its not question but so buggy,
other
Youtube tell for latest flash beta from adobe labs is outdated please update.
So its Google as always.
 
G

Guest

This is bullshit! Now I've gotta upgrade all my computers just to run the damned site...
#RIPFlashPlayer
(n)
 

slamscaper

Posts: 273   +81
Adobe sealed the flash format's fate when they decided to stop support mobile devices. Apparently they wanted this to happen.
 

SNGX1275

Posts: 10,582   +446
What happened in this thread? So many incoherent comments.

HTML5 is hysterically PC incompatible. Working on 10 video from 100 maybe, Flash 50 or more.
HTML5 radically faster than flash its not question but so buggy,
other
Youtube tell for latest flash beta from adobe labs is outdated please update.
So its Google as always.
This is bullshit! Now I've gotta upgrade all my computers just to run the damned site...
#RIPFlashPlayer
(n)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cliffordcooley
Adobe sealed the flash format's fate when they decided to stop support mobile devices. Apparently they wanted this to happen.
Amen. With todays increasingly mobile web, particularly for entertainment platforms and such as Youtube, mobile device compliance is key. Google owns Youtube, and when Adobe dropped formal flash support in all the Linux derivatives including Android, they essentially gave Google the finger. They also gave them business, since Google's browsers were capable of HTML5 access to YouTube already, it gave incentive for people on non-Windows devices to switch to a Chrome flavor.
 

loading

Posts: 67   +13
Hmm... the article left out a bit of important information. HTML5 has DRM built in through Encrypted Media Extensions (EME).

I guess we'll all see how HTML5 pans out.
 

DAOWAce

Posts: 307   +49
"YouTube has actually supported HTML5 for years"

And Mozilla never bothered to have proper support for it all this time; instead rushing to support it when it finally became standard, and it's still not out in the stable build yet.

I won't use anything else but Firefox (or at this point, Palemoon, since Australis is god awful and I'm still running v28 because of it), but Mozilla really have been on a downward spiral for a long time now.
 

SNGX1275

Posts: 10,582   +446
Hmm... the article left out a bit of important information. HTML5 has DRM built in through Encrypted Media Extensions (EME).

I guess we'll all see how HTML5 pans out.
The capability perhaps... but your statement is a half-truth trolling for someone to argue with you. This might be all you get.